Journal of Education and Health Promotion

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2017  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 27-

Effect of health education on awareness about oral cancer and oral self-examination


Kamaljeet Singh1, Deepak Sharma1, Manmeet Kaur1, Krishan Gauba2, Jarnail S Thakur1, Rajesh Kumar1,  
1 Department of Community Medicine, School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
2 Department of Oral Health Sciences, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Correspondence Address:
Rajesh Kumar
Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh - 160 012
India

Abstract

Context: Oral cancer is preceded by visible changes in the oral mucosa. These lesions can be detected by oral self-examination, but awareness about oral cancer is still low in developing countries. Aim: To evaluate the effect of health education on awareness about oral cancer and oral self-examination. Settings and Design: Quasi-experimental trial was conducted in an urban resettlement colony of Chandigarh, India. Materials and Methods: A brochure having information and pictorials on oral lesions was used for conducting health education sessions on a one-to-one basis in the household setting among 85 males in age group 15–59 years during 2013, and each participant was encouraged to perform an oral self-examination. Study participants were interviewed about their awareness on oral cancer and oral self-examination before- and after-health education using a pretested interview schedule. Statistical Analysis: Awareness items were scored, and mean change in awareness score was computed. Paired t- test was used for testing statistical significance. RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of the study participants were current smokers, 25% consumed alcohol, and 9.4% chewed tobacco. The awareness scores after health education increased significantly from 5.3 to 6.7 (P < 0.05), and 34% of the tobacco or alcohol users expressed their intention to quit these habits, and two persons actually quit tobacco chewing. Out of the 77 study participants who performed oral self-examination, nine were able to detect lesions, and one was found to have submucous fibrosis. Conclusions: Health education intervention was able to initiate a favorable behavior change in the community. Hence, oral self-examination programs should be promoted.



How to cite this article:
Singh K, Sharma D, Kaur M, Gauba K, Thakur JS, Kumar R. Effect of health education on awareness about oral cancer and oral self-examination.J Edu Health Promot 2017;6:27-27


How to cite this URL:
Singh K, Sharma D, Kaur M, Gauba K, Thakur JS, Kumar R. Effect of health education on awareness about oral cancer and oral self-examination. J Edu Health Promot [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Sep 24 ];6:27-27
Available from: https://www.jehp.net/text.asp?2017/6/1/27/205742


Full Text

 Introduction



Oral cancer is a growing health problem in several regions of the world. It is the sixth most common cancer globally. About three hundred thousand cases of oral cavity and lip cancers had occurred worldwide in 2012; most these cases had occurred in developing countries.[1] In India, the age-adjusted rate of oral cancer was 20/100,000 population, which is higher than that reported in the developed countries.[2] Etiology of oral cancer has been primarily linked to the use of tobacco in smoking and chewable form; other factors such as poor oral hygiene and nutritional influences also contribute in its etiology. Recently, human papilloma virus, particularly type 16/18, has been reported as one of the etiologic factors.[3],[4]

Oral cancer is ideal cancer to be identified by screening program. However, majority of these cancers still present at an advanced stage when cure rates are abysmal. Ignorance about the danger signs or lack of health seeking behavior in case of premalignant lesions is perhaps responsible for this situation. The time taken by the patient with oral cancer to seek medical advice is the longest delay, and it is followed by the delay on the part of medical professionals to refer patients to specialized units for confirmation. The late diagnosis also leads to the high economic burden.[5],[6],[7]

Screening and health education are well-recognized approaches for preventing the occurrence of oral cancers.[8] In South India, a significant reduction in mortality was observed after implementation of oral, visual screening by the primary care workers.[9] Health education has also been instrumental in improving the health-related knowledge and behavior [10] Communities residing in an area where a poster campaign took place had better chances to be aware of oral cancer compared with a comparison community residents elsewhere.[11],[12]

However, awareness about oral cancer prevention, especially about the role of oral self-examination, is still very low in developing countries where the incidence of oral cancer is quite high. Several types of health education modalities need to be tested in varied population groups to find out the most suitable approach in the local context. Hence, this study was carried out in an urban slum population of Chandigarh to assess the effect of a health education intervention package on the awareness about prevention of oral cancer and adoption of oral self-examination practice.

 Materials and Methods



This quasi-experimental study was conducted, after obtaining approval from the Dissertation Committee of the Institute, from May to June 2013 among males who were residing in an urban slum area of Chandigarh where Institute had established a health center. The study was restricted to adult males because oral examination of females by a male doctor was considered to be a sensitive issue in the community. Sample size estimate was based on a previous study in which the awareness of oral cancer was 60%.[13] For calculating sample size, we assumed that post health education intervention the awareness will increase from 60% to 80%. Thus, a sample of 93 was estimated at 95% confidence interval, 80% power, and 10% drop out rate.

Sampling methodology was finalized by three authors (RK, JS, and KG). The first author (KS) was involved in primary data collection and giving the health education intervention to study participants. Authors RK, JS, KG, and DS supervised the data collection.

The study was carried out in an urban slum area (Indira Colony) of Chandigarh city. It is inhabited by migrant laborers, who mostly belong to low socioeconomic strata of the society, and are more vulnerable to oral cancer due to high prevalence of risky habits This area was purposely selected because our Department of Community Medicine delivers health care services in this area through a health center; hence, follow-up of the study population could be easily ensured.

Systematic random sampling was used by DS under the supervision of JS for selecting the study participants in the age group of 15–59 years. The number of houses was divided by the sample size to find out the sampling interval. The first house was selected randomly, and then next houses were chosen by adding the sampling interval to the previous one. If the house to be studied was found to be locked or if it did not have a male in the eligible age group, the next house was chosen. In case, multiple households were staying within the same house, one household was chosen randomly from amongst them. Further, if there were more than one male in the sampled household in the eligible age group, Leslie Kish table was used to select one of them as a study participant.[14]

The study tool was a structured pretested close ended questionnaire which had questions on social and demographic aspects, awareness about oral cancer, and questions regarding substance abuse. This study tool was adapted from the study by Elango et al. for which prior permission was obtained.[15] A pilot study was conducted by the first author (KS), prior to the main study in an area other than the study area (Civil Dispensary of Sector 38, Chandigarh) in which ten patients attending dental clinic were administered the questionnaire. The results of this pilot study were used to improve upon the questionnaire. The post intervention questionnaire also included a few additional questions such as whether the study participant had performed oral self-examination, and whether he has found any lesions in the oral cavity or whether he has any intention to quit tobacco or alcohol, and whether he has actually quit any of these habits? The construct validity, face validity, and content validity of the questionnaire and health education brochure were tested by a group of three experts: community physician (RK), dental surgeon (KG), and sociologist (MK).

Study participants were interviewed in home setting individually by KS before the intervention after ensuring privacy and obtaining their informed written consent. Of the 93 sampled participants, eight could not be contacted despite repeated attempts. After completion of the interviews, investigator (KS) provided “oral cancer health education brochure” to the participants, and health education sessions were conducted on a one-to-one basis in the home setting by the first author (KS). This brochure had information on risk factors, early warning symptoms, and signs of oral cancer along with steps for conducting oral self-examination, in a vernacular language with pictorial views of precancerous lesions and conditions [Figure 1].[16] The brochure had been extensively pretested and modified before final use.{Figure 1}

KS instructed the participants to do oral self-examination in the morning after brushing of teeth and rinsing of mouth thoroughly. They were asked to stand in front of a mirror in good light and visualize the entire oral cavity well. Then with mouth closed, hold lip with the tips of your fingers, and evert it and look at it carefully. Curl lips back and inspects teeth by gritting them together. Curl tongue tip upward, then sideways and look at the floor of the mouth. Finally, stick tongue out as far as it can go and pull it back. Look at each cheek's inner surface and at the roof of the mouth. Feel systematically using the index finger of one hand, feel all the parts of the oral cavity in the same sequence as looked in the local examination.[17]

Two weeks after, the health education intervention, participants were again interviewed, and a dental surgeon (KS) conducted the oral examination. Those suspected of having a probable neoplastic lesion were referred to a senior dental surgeon (KG) in a tertiary care hospital for confirmation of diagnosis and management of the disease.

Statistical analysis was done using Epi info software for windows (version 7.0.8.0, Centre for Disease Control, Atlanta). Each correct awareness question was awarded a score of one. Thus, awareness score ranged from zero to eight. Change in the awareness score after the intervention was computed. Paired t-test was used to test the statistical significance of the change.

 Results



The mean age of study participants was 33.2 years (standard deviation 11.2 years). Socioeconomic characteristics and awareness level are presented in [Table 1]. About 16% of the respondents were illiterate, and about 18% had attained education level of graduate and above. More than 50% respondents were employed in private jobs, and about 8% were students. Only 22% had a monthly income of Rs. 15,000 or more.{Table 1}

Before the intervention, about 86% had heard about oral cancer. Around 26% reported it to be a contagious disease. Seventy-eight percent reported smoking as a cause of oral cancer, 55% felt that alcohol use can cause oral cancer, and 81% mentioned chewing “Gutkha” or “Khaini” or “Pan” as a cause oral cancer. As shown in [Table 1], the awareness level was more in 15–19 years age group, higher income groups, and literates at graduation or above level. Awareness was maximum among students and minimum among self-employed.

After the health education intervention, awareness level increased significantly [Table 1] and [Table 2]. The mean awareness scores after the health education intervention increased from 5.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.8–5.8) to 6.7 (95% CI: 6.4–6.9). Out of the 85 study participants, 77 (90.5%) had performed oral self-examination, and 9 (11.6%) of them were able to suspect lesions in their mouth [Figure 2]. Among these nine participants, eight had aphthous ulcers, and one had difficulty in opening the mouth that was diagnosed as having sub-mucous fibrosis. He was referred to a tertiary hospital where the submucous fibrosis, which was in its late stage, was confirmed, and treatment was started.{Table 2}{Figure 2}

Thirty-three percent of the study participants were current smokers, 9.4% were using tobacco in chewable forms like “Gutkha,” “Khaini” or “Pan,” and 25% consumed alcohol. After the health education intervention, in which the association of these risk factors with oral cancer had been explained, out of those, who had been using tobacco and or alcohol, 34% expressed the willingness to quit the tobacco/alcohol use; and two participants actually quit the oral tobacco use. Of those who detected the ulcer/lesions, 5 were either smoking or chewing tobacco or were drinking alcohol. Oral submucous fibrosis case had the habit of tobacco chewing and alcohol drinking.

 Discussion



The awareness levels about oral cancer prevention and control were already high in the study community, but none of the participants had performed an oral self-examination. The health education intervention initiated a favorable behavior change in the community. More than 90% of the study participants performed oral self-examination, and one case of submucosal fibrosis was identified. The awareness levels also increased further to a higher level [Table 1] and [Table 2]. Similar to our finding, a study among the patients attending dental hospital in Sri Lanka reported a high level of awareness about oral cancer.[18] Similarly, in South India also, 86% of the respondents had heard about oral cancer.[19] Contrary to our finding, a study in the United Kingdom reported that general public had an alarming lack of awareness and knowledge about oral cancer and its risk factors.[20] Studies in North Carolina have also reported low awareness level.[21] Lower incidence of oral cancer in developed countries could be the possible reason of lower level of awareness, whereas, higher incidence of oral cancer in developing countries may have increased its awareness in the developing country setting.[22]

The awareness level about oral cancer in our study was comparatively less among the illiterates. This finding is similar to the results of a study conducted in high-risk groups.[19] The awareness levels were highest in the high-income groups and lowest in lower income group respondents. Similar findings have been reported in Sri Lanka.[18] Therefore, the socioeconomic and educational status of the respondents should be an important consideration while designing health education programs.

Most of the respondents performed oral self-examination in our study after the health education intervention. This behavior change can be attributed to the health education intervention which was implemented over a short period of 2 months. We do not think there was any other source of information on this topic in the community. A parallel control population would have been a better study design but due to ethical reasons, it was not possible to include a control population, hence, a quasi-experimental pre- and post-test design was adopted. The health education brochure had simple, clear messages with a pictorial in the language which participants could understand. The brochure could be kept in the house for reading at any time according to the convenience of the study participant. Others have also reported significantly higher knowledge among those who had received information leaflets. In a randomized trial, public education campaigns using leaflets have been found to improve knowledge among general public and health service users.[23] Oral cancer screening programs have been found to be a cost-effective measure in raising the awareness and reducing mortality.[9],[11] The follow-up period was only 2 weeks in our study. Future studies should assess whether the behavior change is sustained after longer time periods.

The prevalence of smoking and smokeless tobacco use was higher in the study community than the proportions reported in Global Adult Tobacco Survey report for Chandigarh City.[24] The reason for this may that this study was conducted among an urban slum area of Chandigarh city which is mainly inhabited by migrants from other states. After health education intervention, about one-third substance users expressed their intention to quit these habits. In future, some of them could enter into the next stage of quitting, thereby reducing the incidence of oral cancer. Hence, promotion of oral self-examination could be a potential primary preventive strategy.

 Conclusion



Health education intervention was effective in increasing the awareness about oral cancer and its risk factors in an urban slum area of Chandigarh. Moreover, health education was effective in motivating some of them to quit tobacco and alcohol habit. Hence, health education on oral cancer should be delivered through visual aids like brochures to encourage oral self-examination. Primary health care workers should be trained to educate people about the risk factors, precancerous conditions, early signs and symptoms of oral cancer and on how to conduct oral self-examination and report any abnormal lesion.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1International Agency for Cancer Research. GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence World-wide in 2012. Available from: http://www.globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx. [Last accessed on 2015 Sep 26].
2Prasad LK. Burden of oral cancer: An Indian scenario. J Orofac Sci 2014;6:77. Available from: http://www.jofs.in/text.asp?2014/6/2/77/143043. [Last accessed on 2015 Oct 11].
3Sankaranarayanan R, Masuyer E, Swaminathan R, Ferlay J, Whelan S. Head and neck cancer: A global perspective on epidemiology and prognosis. Anticancer Res 1998;18:4779-86.
4Sankaranarayanan R. Oral cancer in India: An epidemiologic and clinical review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;69:325-30.
5Boyle P, Macfarlane GJ, Scully C. Oral cancer: Necessity for prevention strategies. Lancet 1993;342:1129.
6Why Screening Works. Available from: http://www.oralcancerfoundation.org/dental/why_screening_works.php. [Last accessed on 2015 Jun 11].
7McLeod NM, Saeed NR, Ali EA. Oral cancer: Delays in referral and diagnosis persist. Br Dent J 2005;198:681-4.
8Jullien JA, Zakrzewska JM, Downer MC, Speight PM. Attendance and compliance at an oral cancer screening programme in a general medical practice. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1995;31B: 202-6.
9Sankaranarayanan R, Ramadas K, Thomas G, Muwonge R, Thara S, Mathew B, et al. Effect of screening on oral cancer mortality in Kerala, India: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:1927-33.
10Barbadoro P, Lucrezi D, Prospero E, Annino I. Improvement of knowledge, attitude, and behavior about oral health in a population of alcohol addicted persons. Alcohol Alcohol 2008;43:347-50.
11Humphris GM, Field EA. An oral cancer information leaflet for smokers in primary care: Results from two randomised controlled trials. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:143-9.
12Etter JF, Laszlo E. Evaluation of a poster campaign against passive smoking for World No-Tobacco Day. Patient Educ Couns 2005;57:190-8.
13Srikanth Reddy B, Doshi D, Padma Reddy M, Kulkarni S, Gaffar A, Ram Reddy V. Oral cancer awareness and knowledge among dental patients in South India. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012;40:521-4.
14Kish Summary of Eight Table. Available from: http://www.who.int/chp/steps/resources/Kish_Summary_of_Eight_Tables.doc. [Last accessed on 2013 Dec 26].
15Elango KJ, Anandkrishnan N, Suresh A, Iyer SK, Ramaiyer SK, Kuriakose MA. Mouth self-examination to improve oral cancer awareness and early detection in a high-risk population. Oral Oncol 2011;47:620-4.
16The Importance of Oral Self-examination. Available from: http://www.sixstepscreening.org/wp-content/uploads/Self-Exam.pdf. [Last accessed on 2013 Dec 26].
17General Techniques of Oral Self Examination. Available from: http://www.indiacancer.org/index.php?option=com_content and view=article & id=79 & Itemid=34. [Last accesed on 2013 Dec 26].
18Ariyawardana A, Vithanaarachchi N. Awareness of oral cancer and precancer among patients attending a hospital in Sri Lanka. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2005;6:58-61.
19Warnakulasuriya KA, Harris CK, Scarrott DM, Watt R, Gelbier S, Peters TJ, et al. An alarming lack of public awareness towards oral cancer. Br Dent J 1999;187:319-22.
20Cruz GD, Le Geros RZ, Ostroff JS, Hay JL, Kenigsberg H, Franklin DM. Oral cancer knowledge, risk factors and characteristics of subjects in a large oral cancer screening program. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:1064-71.
21Ariyawardana A, Sitheeque MA, Ranasinghe AW, Perera I, Tilakaratne WM, Amaratunga EA, et al. Prevalence of oral cancer and pre-cancer and associated risk factors among tea estate workers in the central Sri Lanka. J Oral Pathol Med 2007;36:581-7.
22Ford PJ, Farah CS. Early detection and diagnosis of oral cancer: Strategies for improvement. J Cancer Policy 2013;1:e2-7.
23Petti S, Scully C. Oral cancer knowledge and awareness: Primary and secondary effects of an information leaflet. Oral Oncol 2007;43:408-15.
24Global Adult Tobacco Survey- India Survey. Avaliable from: http://www.mohfw.nic.in/WriteReadData/l892s/1455618937GATS%20India.pdf. [Last accessed on 2015 May 27].