Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 
Users Online: 366
Home Print this page Email this page

 



 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
J Edu Health Promot 2020,  9:73

Integrated framework to improve health policy implementation in the way of Iran 2025 vision: Bridging policy to practice gap in developing countries


1 Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences; Health Managers Development Institute (HMDI), Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
3 Health Managers Development Institute (HMDI); Secretariat of Supreme Council for Health and Food Security, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran

Date of Submission10-Aug-2019
Date of Acceptance14-Nov-2019
Date of Web Publication31-Mar-2020

Correspondence Address:
Mehdi Jafari
School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, No. 6, Rashid Yasemi St., Vali-e-asr Ave, Tehran 1995614111
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_444_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


INTRODUCTION: Health policymaking seems simple; in practice, but, it is very complex. However, this study aimed to provide a framework to bridge the gap between policy and action in order to present an interconnected model for developing countries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a qualitative study. Using desk search, different models were searched from various scientific databases for formulation of an integrated policy-making framework. In next stage, the identified National upstream documents were analyzed to achieve existing policymaking evidence. Then to determine the validity of the initial model and to gather the views of key experts, two Delphi rounds were used. The tool used in Delphi method was a 9-point Likert questionnaire that was sent to the experts via E-mail.
RESULTS: This model, by employing integrated chain of visions and strategic targeting of ultimate aims on the one hand and expected key functions and support functions for generating output (operational goal) on the other, provides an extensive operable insight being influenced by human-Islamic principles and values, social, technological, economic, environmental, and political for strategic as well as operational managers./Policy makers
CONCLUSION: This framework consisted of general, strategic, and executive levels. It creates the needed institutional and structural capacity to achieve a comprehensive health approach for all laws and policies to control social factors affecting health, improve health situation, and promote the health of citizens.

Keywords: Health policy, health systems, implementation, integrated, Iran


How to cite this article:
Mousavi SM, Jafari M, Vosoogh-Moghadam A. Integrated framework to improve health policy implementation in the way of Iran 2025 vision: Bridging policy to practice gap in developing countries. J Edu Health Promot 2020;9:73

How to cite this URL:
Mousavi SM, Jafari M, Vosoogh-Moghadam A. Integrated framework to improve health policy implementation in the way of Iran 2025 vision: Bridging policy to practice gap in developing countries. J Edu Health Promot [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 30];9:73. Available from: https://www.jehp.net/text.asp?2020/9/1/73/281650




  Introduction Top


Health is a simple concept. However, the definition of policy-making and execution of policies is not simple; there are many obstacles.[1] There are several different models which are used to define health. Using holistic model, World Health Organization (WHO) (1948) defined health as a complete physical, psychological, and social well-being, and not just the absence of illness or disability; in 1984, it transformed “health as a state” to a dynamic model in which health was introduced as a process.[2],[3]

The health of people has always been one of the main concerns of governments. It is one of the sovereignty goals and civil rights of all countries, including Iran. The community health impact on just and sustainable development.[4],[5] This development will be possible if government take into account the factors affecting health. This approach will strengthen political discourse on health, its determinants, and responsiveness to health outcomes.[6] The WHO defines public health policymaking as “including health at policy-makers” agenda at all levels and departments, directing policymakers to get aware of outcomes of their decisions on health, and accepting health-related responsibilities.[7]

According to WHO, the government is responsible for directing health system. The Ministry of Health has the main responsibility; it should determine orientations, policies, and strategies, impact on behavior of actors at inside and outside of health department, monitor, organize, and guide the efforts, and develop national health actions.[6],[8] The health system consists of individuals, units, resources, interdepartment joint plans, and executive actions at various fields; its main goal is to promote the physical, psychological, and social health of people within the framework of national policies.[9] To achieve their general goals, the health systems manage the provision of services, guidance and governance, financing, human resources, information, medicines and vaccines, health products, and physical facilities to provide individual and group services, evidence, and policies to reform individual, organizational, environmental, and social determinants of health.[10] The health systems have been trying to improve their performance by discovering and understanding changes in environment and recognizing diverse needs. In this regard, many have benefited from legislation capacities and documents to achieve this goal. However, the correct execution of these policies is important. Since development is possible through successful execution, the policymaking and its execution are important. However, the studies indicate that the development policies and plans usually face obstacles in their execution and in practice, they are not executed satisfactorily.[11]

The Ministry of Health and Medical Education was established in 1985 for optimal use of medical facilities to provide health care and welfare and medical education and research.[12] As the trustee of health system, numerous macro policies such as Iran's Perspective Document 1404, comprehensive scientific plan, general policies for reforming administrative system, health, population, science, and technology are provided as framework for decision-making and roadmap for organization of health system of Iran.[13] Since most senior decision-makers are not familiar with technical literature of policymaking and planning and express their intentions in policy documents in a variety of ways, it is necessary to find a suitable model for translating, removing overlaps, and implementing policies.

Some models have been proposed to bridge the gap between policies and operations.[14] The logical model is a usual framework to reach this goal but this model is a one-way linear model;[15],[16] however, the relationship between elements in health plans is more complicated than this linear relationship; this limits the use of logical models in evaluation of complex interventions. Compared to logical models, the system thinking is a way of examining system widely. According to WHO's recent publication, the system thinking may provide powerful methods to identify and resolve health system challenges and is an important factor in strengthening health systems.[17]

The knowledge translation chain model is one system model which has been suggested in recent years as a functional model for making health-related operational decisions.[18] Bridging the gap between what they know and what they do, this model triggers an operational policymaking for policy-makers.[19] The knowledge translation ensures that the decisionmakers at all levels of health system (consumers, patients, experts, managers, and policymakers) use research evidence to validate health decisions.[20] The policy conceptual analysis framework explicitly clarifies this concept and pave the way for wide research activities and development of research tools to identify barriers, facilitators, and execution arrangements.[21]

However, this study aims to provide an executive framework for stakeholders to understand various general policies and tasks of Ministry of Health, Medical Education, and Medicine. Hence, the strategic policymakers in parliament and executive policy-makers may take advantage of them in their decision-makings without overlapping. Then, it will be more likely to become successful in tackling barriers to health development in Iran.


  Materials and Methods Top


This was a qualitative study. Conducting desk search in Google search engine, different methods of describing, analyzing, and improving health systems were searched in health policy-making and planning journals and international health organizations' databases. Considering comprehensiveness, simplicity, and applicability criteria, the research team selected value chain patterns, health system control knobs, building blocks of WHO, and knowledge translation model. Using mixed approach, then, a framework was drafted for determining the future status of Iran's health system and transforming policy-making items into executive plan. Through focused group discussion with a group of health experts, the drafted model was modified, completed, and finalized.[22]

In next step, the identified National upstream documents were analyzed to achieve existing policy-making evidence. The document analysis is a systematic approach to evaluate (electronic or printed) documents and like other analytical methods in qualitative research, it needs to examine data and interpret them to achieve meaning, understanding, and creating knowledge. In general, the documents include writings and images which are collected by researcher.[23],[24]

The health system policy documents were collected through scientific databases and electronic portals of related organizations. In addition, the manual search of official published reports and existing policy documents was conducted through participation at organizations. The researcher-made questionnaire was used to extract the data from documents. The content of collected data was analyzed manually. The extracted policy items were put into formulated framework. The Delphi technique was used twice to validate primary model and get aware of opinions of experts, informers, and key policy-makers to reach a collective agreement. The first and second rounds of Delphi were conducted with 30 and 15 experts, respectively. A questionnaire (9-point Likert scale) was used as research tool in Delphi method; it was sent to experts by E-mail. This questionnaire consisted of initial proposed model and its components. To analyze the data obtained from Delphi Technique questionnaire, the options with a score of more than 7 were accepted and the options with median 4–7 entered second stage. The options with scores <4 were deleted.

Finding

The selected models of value chain, health control knobs,[25] building blocks of WHO, and knowledge translation model were used to create a framework for mapping the future road map of health system of Iran and transforming policies into integrated and coordinated executive decisions [Figure 1]. This model, by employing integrated chain of visions and strategic targeting of ultimate aims on the one hand and expected key functions and support functions for generating output (operational goal) on the other, provides an extensive operable insight being influenced by human-Islamic principles and values, social, technological, economic, environmental, and political for strategic as well as operational managers./Policy makers.
Figure 1: Decision-making framework for execution of health system policies

Click here to view


The documents which determined the goals and orientations of health system (i.e., Constitution, Iran's Perspective Document 1404, Iran's document of comprehensive scientific plan, and general policies related to health system) were identified, analyzed, and placed in framework. According to [Figure 1], Iran is struggling to promote the human prosperity of entire human society and tries to be at first economic, scientific, and technological place in Southwest Asia region with Islamic and Revolutionary identity, inspire Muslim world, and interact constructively and effectively in international relations, and develop social well-being. To achieve first place in region in terms of health indicators, Iran has included the realization of health and healthy human approach in all laws, executive policies, and regulations. All four dimensions of health (namely, physical, psychological, social, and spiritual) are considered by policy-makers. Increasing fertility rate and prevention from accidents and diseases and social damages such as addiction, divorce, marginalization, urban critical points, and moral corruption are among the strategic goals. Reducing health hazards and pollutions, especially environmental pollution, providing healthy nutrition, improving lifestyle in terms of nutrition and responsibility, and capability and active participation of individuals, family, and society in provision, maintenance, and promotion of health are among the most important executive policies. Updating health services including education, research, health (general health-health promotion and prevention) services, treatment and rehabilitation, and production of credible scientific evidence to adopt effective health policies are among the expected outcomes. Undoubtedly, the health system's supporting functions for producing such products should be changed in terms of structure and process according to policy tasks. In these documents, the developed human is determined to be healthy, motivated, responsive, religious, patriotic, law-abiding, active, responsible, selfless, believer, satisfied, conscientious, disciplined, committed to prosperity of Iran, and proud of being Iranian. The target groups include youth, young couples, mothers (especially during pregnancy and lactation), individuals at work age, individuals in rural and marginal areas, and oppressed people[26],[27],[28],[29].


  Discussion Top


Today, the reforms in health system revolve around policy reforms. Any reform in health system structure should be followed by policy reforms; that is, the aims and direction of policies determine the reforms at structure of health system and its functions.

The presented model illustrates the route of health system in line with intentions of senior policy-makers in three general, strategic, and executive levels. As a macro social supertrend, the comprehensive health approach necessitates the cover of all causes of diseases and continuous improvement of health outcomes along a range of dimensions of health promotion, prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and reduces inequity in health. This approach should be supported by government actions on upstream health-related social factors;[30] this is seen in model.

Focusing on health determinants, the emphasis is shifted from planning, investing, and providing health services to a wider range of political, economic, social, and environmental factors which have more effects on people health.[31] The socioeconomic policies are the most important determinants of health and the macroeconomic policies affect health and health inequities.[32] The determination to integrate social determinants in health care system,[33] including them in routine health assessments, considering social problems as a part of care plan for individuals, and using health information technology to collect information on health-related social factors to improve policies and practices[34] indicate the importance of considering social factors affecting health in all laws, regulations, and executive policies and the role of technology as one of the functions supporting the health system in National Perspective Plan.

The policies should be designed as manageable and controllable and have dynamic relationship with around environment. The health policy is just one of components of social policy and should be designed and implemented alongside other social policies. In all policies, the health is a collaborative approach to improve the health of all individuals by integrating decision-making considerations in all policymaking sectors and areas.[35] The health strategies also work at several levels and their effects go beyond health outcomes; other departments achieve health outcomes without interfering in health sector.[36] The transparent goals and perspectives explained in model, powerful leadership in health system and government, legal support through reviewing health laws, and establishing a supportive structure are the prerequisite of realizing health in all policies.[37] Creating the needed institutional and structural capacity and determination and follow-up at government's highest levels to realize comprehensive health approach in all policies are steps toward controlling social factors affecting health, improving health status, and improving desired health of all citizens.

This framework introduces justice, fairness, solidarity, transparency, accountability, and sustainability as its ethical values. The actions in model include governance and policymaking, participation and work, empowerment of individuals and communities, health reforms, research and evidence, monitoring, and reporting and evaluation as a response to threats to health and economic growth of Iran in future.[38] According to the WHO model, stewardship and its functions directly effects on health systems' goals and outcomes such as accountability, effectiveness, quality, accessibility, coverage and safety, while, it is evident by national and international documents and policies that it has been facing an indirect effects of health systems analysis approaches on health sectors' outcomes and aims. Framework of public health critical functions also is being used in health sector assessment.[39],[40]

The WHO's value-based health policymaking framework determines the strategic health goals of Europe as more justice and better governance of health and sets the priorities as investing in health, empowering people, addressing health challenges including infectious and noncommunicable diseases, strengthening community-based health systems, creating capacity for general health and emergency preparedness, care and response, and creating flexible societies and supporting environments.[41]

Focusing on disadvantaged people is one of the important issues in health system policies. Since the legal and policy documents in health sector did not mention the creation of a good relationship between authorities for protecting poor and disadvantaged people in accessing health services, there is an inconsistency and overlap between tasks in this area.[42] Unfortunately, poor people do not have adequate access to health services.[43],[44],[45] Directing health policies and practices towards poor and needy people may reduce inequity in accessing to health services.

In order to execute the policies outlined in this framework, the prerequisites should be determined for preparation at executive level and removal of barriers. The Australian National Audit Office has determined eight building blocks for successful execution of policies: governance (whole of government approach or policy in all policies), risk management (early detection and management of risks of policy execution), involvement of stakeholders (determining goals for identification of stakeholders), managing conflicts and interactions using their information, planning, resource mobilization (workforce and required skills), financial resources and systems, monitoring, and review and evaluation through active involvement of stakeholders. This report considers the powerful leadership, comprehensive approach, accurate processes, efficient use of resources, and paying attention to execution at each stage of policy design as necessary prerequisites for successful execution. The government awareness of risks involved in execution phase, setting default answers to deal with them, and using the experience of executives in designing policies are important.[46]

More recently, scholars have moved beyond the general claim that “ideas matter” to study how they matter and how they implemented. As argued in other articles, however, the recent multiplication of ideational studies in political science and related disciplines cannot hide the relative neglect of policy implementation within that scholarship. The mismatch (or the harmony) between the ideas associated with a particular policy and the assumptions of the actors tasked to implement it can directly impact the implementation process, and policy development in general.[47],[48]

The Analysis of Determinants of Policy Impact model determines the levers of influence or determinants of success or failure of policymaking process and adoption of strategies for successful execution of policies as: consistency of goals, commitments (policymakers' professional duties and institutional arrangements of policymaking system and its target community), resources (capabilities of policymakers and their respective organizations such as their personnel and their financial resources), and opportunities (organizational opportunities including new decision-making structure, political opportunities including cooperation between different political sectors, and public opportunities including support of society and media).[49],[50] Considering this approach, taking steps for proper institutional organization of executives and their active engagement, assigning sufficient resources for execution, predicting challenges and threats, and taking advantage of opportunities should be included in policymakers' agenda for executing policies.


  Conclusion Top


Finally, it is important to note that the health sector alone is not able to create an excellent level of health and well-being for people; this goal requires national solidarity and awareness and social participation. Focusing more on role of people in promoting health, utilizing community capacity to improve health and its components, attracting support for increasing attention to role of health in improving economic growth, considering health in all macroeconomic and social policies, integrating health-related social components in care provision plan provided by health system, and collaboration of other health institutions and organizations to improve the health of society within the health policymaking framework which is provided in this study will help to improve the health of all Iranians and will provide health services for all people. One of the most important innovations in this research is the comprehensive integration of policy and planning literature in the model. The research team, by systematic reviewing all available national upstream documents, has attempted to delineate a comprehensive insight into supreme politicians' priorities and concerns through a concise framework for health system planners working at different industry levels and positions.

Furthermore, research limitations include the inability to access the policy development details such as exact debates and discussions during meetings and the process of formulating general policies in the upstream document to better understand policymakers' intentions. In addition, the resultant framework was solely based on the scientific and practical experiences of the research team synthesized according to different planning patterns; thus, there is room for possible human error.

Acknowledgment

This study was a part of a PhD thesis supported by Iran University of Medical Sciences (Grant No: IUMS/SHMIS_1395/9321557003). The authors would like to thank the research deputy of Iran University of Medical Sciences for financially supporting the present work and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study is a partial of a PhD thesis approved and supported by Iran University of Medical Sciences (Grant No:. IUMS/SHMIS_1395/9321557003).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
VahdaniniaV, Vosoogh-Moghaddam A. Understanding late logic of health policy making: The transition to governance for health. Payesh 2018; 17 (6):631-46  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
World Health Organization. Health promotion: a discussion document on the concept and principles: summary report of the Working Group on Concept and Principles of Health Promotion, Copenhagen, 9-13 July 1984. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 1984.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Adler NE, Glymour MM, Fielding J. Addressing social determinants of health and Health Inequalities. JAMA 2016; 316:1641-2.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mehrdad R. Health system in Iran. JMAJ 2009; 52 (1):69-73.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Adam T, Hsu J, de Savigny D, Lavis JN, Røttingen JA, Bennett S. Evaluating health systems strengthening interventions in low-income and middle-income countries: Are we asking the right questions? Health Policy Plan 2012;27 Suppl 4:iv9-19.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Opolski JT, Wysocki MJ. “Health 2020”–New Framework for Health Policy. Part II. Przegl Epidemiol 2013; 67:647-50. 735-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
WorldHealth Organization. The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. World Health Organization; 1986 [Updated 2019 February 4; cited 2019 February 28]. Available from: https://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/previous/ottawa/en/.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
World Health Organization. The world health report 2000: health systems: improving performance. World Health Organization; 2000.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Schilsky RL, Michels DL, Kearbey AH, Yu PP, Hudis CA. Building a rapid learning health care system for oncology: The regulatory framework of CancerLinQ. J Clin Oncol 2014;32: 2373-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Omaswa F, Boufford JI. Strong ministries for strong health systems. An Overview of the Study Report: Supporting Ministerial Health Leadership: A Strategy for Health Systems Strengthening. New York: The African Center for Global Health and Social Transformation (ACHEST) and The New York Academy of Medicine (NYAM). 2010 Jan.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Tahani B, Khoshnevisan MH, Yazdani S, Ebn Ahmady A, Dugdale P. Stewardship of National oral health system in Iran: Its strengths and weaknesses. Arch Iran Med 2013;16:717-24.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s Constitution of 1979 with Amendments Through; 1989 [Updated 2019 March 6; cited 2019 March 21]. Available from: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Iran_1989.pdf?lang=en.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Vosoogh Moghaddam A, Damari B, Alikhani S, Salarianzedeh M, Rostamigooran N, Delavari A, et al. Health in the 5th 5-years development Plan of Iran: Main challenges, general policies and strategies. Iran J Public Health 2013; 42:42-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Haines A, Kuruvilla S, Borchert M. Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health. Bull World Health Organ 2004; 82:724-31.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
CracknellB. Evaluating the effectiveness of the logical framework system in practice. Proj Appraisal 1989; 4:163-7[Updated 2019 March 8; cited 2019 March 21]. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1989.9726727?needAccess=true  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
SartoriusRH. The logical framework approach to project design and management. Eval Pract 1991; 12:139-47 [Updated 2019 March 6; cited 2019 March 21]. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ436845.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Mutale W, Balabanova D, Chintu N, Mwanamwenge MT, Ayles H. Application of system thinking concepts in health system strengthening in low-income settings: A proposed conceptual framework for the evaluation of a complex health system intervention: The case of the BHOMA intervention in Zambia. J Eval Clin Pract 2016; 22:112-21.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Landry R, Amara N, Pablos-Mendes A, Shademani R, Gold I. The knowledge-value chain: A conceptual framework for knowledge translation in health. Bull World Health Organ 2006; 84:597-602.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Straus SE, Graham ID, Mazmanian PE. Knowledge translation: Resolving the confusion. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006; 26:3-4.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Straus SE, Tetroe JM, Graham ID. Knowledge translation is the use of knowledge in health care decision making. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:6-10.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Rafii F, Parvizy S, Mehrdad N, Peyrovi H, Khoddam H. Clarification of knowledge translation in health system. Iran J Nurs Res 2012;7:72-81 [Updated 2019 March 9; cited 2019 March 24]. Available from: http://ijnr.ir/browse.php?a_id=436&sid=1 &slc_lang=en.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
World Health Organization. Monitoring the Building Blocks of Health Systems: A Handbook of Indicators and Their Measurement Strategies. World Health Organization.2010 [Updated 2019 March 9; cited 2019 March 24]. Available from: https://www.who.int/healthinfo/systems/WHO_MBHSS_2010_full_web.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Bowen GA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J 2009;9:27-40. [Updated 2019 March 11; cited 2019 March 25]. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0e25/32c31c992ac0930998561932f198b467572d.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Rajabi F, Esmailzadeh H, Rostamigooran N, Majdzadeh R. What must be the pillars of Iran's health system in 2025? values and principles of health system reform plan. Iran J Public Health 2013;42:197-205.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Heydari M, Doshmangir L. Comparative study of the health systems performance assessment frameworks in the world. J Hosp 2019;17:35-46 [Updated2019 April 4; cited 2019 April 18]. Available from: http://jhosp.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5880-en.html.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
AnnouncingGeneral Health Policies; 2015 [Updated 2019 May 5; cited 2019 April 18]. Available from: http://farsi.khamenei.ir/news-content?id=26083.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Announcing General Family Policies; 2015 [Updated 2019 November 14; cited2019April 18]. Available from: http://farsi.khamenei.ir/news-content?id=34254.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Announcing General Population Policies; 2015 [Updated 2019 November 14; cited 2019 April 18]. Available from: http://farsi.khamenei.ir/news-content?id=26440.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
The Perspective of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the 1404, 2011. Updated2019 May 12; cited 2019 April 18] Available from: http://farsi.khamenei.ir/special?id=4133.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Esmaeil Akbari M, Mohammadi G, Vosoogh-Moghaddam A, Rabanikhah F, Javadi H, Rostami-Gooran N, et al. National health guidelines in I.R of Iran, an innovative approach for developing countries. Iran J Cancer Prev 2015;8:77-83.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Baum F, Freeman T, Lawless A, Labonte R, Sanders D. What is the difference between comprehensive and selective primary health care? Evidence from a five-year longitudinal realist case study in South Australia. BMJ Open 2017;7: e015271.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Keliddar I, Mosadeghrad AM, Jafari-Sirizi M. Rationing in health systems: A critical review. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2017;31:47.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Zaboli R, Seyedin SH, Malmoon Z. Macroeconomic policies and increasing social-health inequality in Iran. Int J Health Policy Manag 2014;3:129-34.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Raphael JL, Colvin JD. More than wheezing: incorporating social determinants into public policy to improve asthma outcomes in children. Pediatr Res 2017;81:2-3.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Sullivan SS, Mistretta F, Casucci S, Hewner S. Integrating social context into comprehensive shared care plans: A scoping review. Nurs Outlook 2017;65:597-606.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Bharmal N, Derose KP, Felician M, Weden MM. Understanding the Upstream Social Determinants of Health. California: RAND; 2015 [Updated2019 September 14; cited 2019 December 25]. Available from: https://www.resourcebasket.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/upstream.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
St., Pierre L, Hamel G, Lapointe G, McQueen D, Wismar M. Governance Tools and Framework for Health in All Policies. Quebec: National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy, International Union for Health Promotion and Education and European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Ireland H. A Framework for Improved Health and Wellbeing 2013-2025. Department of Health; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Joulaei H, Bagheri-Lankarani, K Zarei N, Keshtkar V, Hatam N, Kavousi Z, et al. Stewardship and its role in Iran'shealthsystem: A scoping review. IJHP, 2018; 2:206-16.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
World Health Organization. Essential Public Health Functions: A Three-Country Study in the Western Pacific Region. World Health Organization; 2003 [Updated2019 September 14; cited 2019 December 25]. Available from: https://iris.wpro.who.int/handle/10665.1/5437.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
World Health Organization. Health 2020: a European policy framework and strategy for the 21st century. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe; 2013  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Etemadi M, Gorji HA, Kangarani HM, Ashtarian K. Power structure among the actors of financial support to the poor to access health services: Social network analysis approach. Soc Sci Med 2017;195:1-1.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Aryankhesal A, EtemadiM, Agharahimi Z, Rostami E, Mohseni M, Musavi Z. Analysis of social functions in Iran's public hospitals: pattern of offering discounts to poor patients. International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare 2016;9 (4):242-53.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Mohammadbeigi A, Hassanzadeh J, Eshrati B, Rezaianzadeh A. Socioeconomic inequity in health care utilization, Iran. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2013;3:139-46.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Nouraei Motlagh S, Sabermahani A, Hadian M, Lari MA, Mahdavi MR, Abolghasem Gorji H. Factors affecting health care utilization in Tehran. Glob J Health Sci 2015;7:240-9.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Australian National AuditOffice. Implementation of Program and Policy Initiatives: Making Implementation Matter, Better Practice Guide. 2006  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
BélandD, Ridde V. Ideas and Policy Implementation: Understanding the Resistance against Free Health Care in Africa. Global Health Governance 2016;10 (3).  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Holland JH, Green JJ, Alexander L, Phillips M. School health policies: Evidenced-based programs for policy implementation. J Policy Pract 2016;15:314-32.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Rütten A, Gelius P, Abu-Omar K. Policy development and implementation in health promotion – From theory to practice: The ADEPT model. Health Promot Int 2011;26:322-9.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Jafari M, Habibirad A, Pourtaleb A, Salarianzadeh MH. Health system organizational reform in governing Iranian public hospitals: A content analysis to comprehend the barriers in Board of Trustees' hospitals. The International journal of health planning and management. 2018;33:e612-20.  Back to cited text no. 50
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed384    
    Printed32    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded76    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal