Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 
Users Online: 544
Home Print this page Email this page


Previous article Browse articles Next article 
J Edu Health Promot 2020,  9:179

Effects of training based on the health belief model on Iranian women's performance about cervical screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis

1 Midwifery and Reproductive Health Research Center, Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Razi School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
3 Student Research Committee, Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Date of Submission13-Nov-2019
Date of Acceptance29-Feb-2020
Date of Web Publication28-Jul-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Somayeh Abdolahian
Student Research Commitee Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Arabi Ave, Daneshjoo Blvd, Postal Code: 1996835119, Tehran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_684_19

Rights and Permissions

CONTEXT: Pap smear test is one of the most important actions in preventing cervical cancer. This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis on all related literature about the effects of health belief model (HBM)-based training on Pap smear screening test performance of Iranian women.
METHODS: The search was performed in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria were limited to English and Persian language articles with experimental or semi-experimental methods until October 2019 that evaluated the effect of HBM-based training on Iranian women's performance of Pap smear test. We excluded studies that used both cervical and breast cancer screening together.
RESULTS: Twelve studies were performed on totally 1605 participants. This meta-analysis showed that all of Health Belief Model (HBM) constructs improved significantly among HBM-based trained women, perceived susceptibility (standard mean division [SMD] =0.785; P = 0.002; confidence interval [CI] = 0.005 to 1.56; Heterogeneity; P = 0.013; I2= 97%)., perceived severity (SMD = 1.14; P = 0.001; CI = 0.66–1.62; heterogeneity; P < 0.001; I2= 92%), perceived benefits (SMD = 1.25; P = 0.001; CI = 0.545–0.135 heterogeneity; P = 0.003; I2= 97%), perceived barrier (SMD = 0.20; P = 0.001; CI = 0.44–1.24; heterogeneity; P < 0.001; I2= 92%) and perceived self-efficacy (SMD = 0.638; P < 0.001; CI =1.76–0.426; heterogeneity; P < 0.001; I2= 97%).
CONCLUSION: Cervical screening education program based on the HBM can be effective on Iranian women's performance in their perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived barrier, and perceived self-efficacy about Pap smear test.

Keywords: Cervical cancer screening, health belief model, smear

How to cite this article:
Simbar M, Ghazanfarpour M, Abdolahian S. Effects of training based on the health belief model on Iranian women's performance about cervical screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Edu Health Promot 2020;9:179

How to cite this URL:
Simbar M, Ghazanfarpour M, Abdolahian S. Effects of training based on the health belief model on Iranian women's performance about cervical screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Edu Health Promot [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 3];9:179. Available from: https://www.jehp.net/text.asp?2020/9/1/179/290950

  Introduction Top

Cervical cancer is the most prevalent carcinoma and the major cause of death among women in developing countries. Nearly 25% of the women's mortality is due to malignant tumors and 18% of them related to cervical cancer.[1] The prevalence rate of cervical cancer in Iran has been reported to be 4.5 / 100,000 individuals; besides, reports indicate that this cancer is the fourth most prevalent type of cancer among Iranian women.[2] Due to having a long preinvasive period and accessibility of the screening programs as well as effective treatment of its lesions, cervical cancer is considered as preventable cancer.[3] Cervical cancer screening is one of the most important actions in preventing this disease, the purpose of which is to diagnose the lesions in the premalignant stage and reduce the cancer-caused mortality.[4] Based on the studies in this regard, lack of regular screening results in the increase by 2–6 times in the risk of cervical cancer incidence.[5]

Since 1950, the Pap test has been successful in reducing the prevalence of cervical cancer and its resulted mortality by 79% and 70%, respectively.[4] This method diagnoses 13,000 invasive cancer cases as well as one million precancerous lesions annually.[6] Although in the health system of Iran, the Pap test is performed on the age group of 20–65 years one to three times a year since 1991 and also it is an effective and nonexpensive test, several studies have indicated that the Iranian women have not greatly welcomed it.[7] In general, knowledge, attitude, and beliefs are considered the determinant factors for an individual's participation in screening programs.[3],[8] Selecting an appropriate psychosocial model of health behavior is the first step in the planning process.[9] There are various health behavior models, including stage of change model,[10] behavioral intention model,[11] and precede-proceed model[12]. It is interesting that using model based educations was effective on cervical cancer prevention behavior.[13]

The health belief model (HBM) is one of most popular models in the field of health education, the validity and reliability of which have been proved in different studies based on the recognition of beliefs in cervical cancer.[5] This model demonstrates the relationship between health belief and health behavior and is focused on the personal perception about disease and the beliefs about disease prevention as well as the effects of these factors on the health performance. The HBM which was introduced in the field of public health in 1950 includes five elements: perceived susceptibility to cervical cancer, perceived severity to side effect of cervical cancer, benefits perceived to Pap smear, barriers perceived to Pap smear, and self-efficacy to guidance for practice.[8] This model is frequently used in reproductive health and women's cancer prevention studies and programs, but the findings about effect of HBM on Pap smear in different studies have controversies.[14],[15]

Review of literature showed that there is no study that summarizes the effect of training the women via health belief method on performing the Pap test in Iran; therefore, the aim of this systematic review study was to evaluate and compare the effects of training based on the HBM on Iranian women's performance about cervical screening.

  Methods Top

Eligible studies include all experimental or semi-experimental studies in which samples were randomly allocated. These included studies used the control group or placebo with double-blind, single-blind, or nonblinded method and were published in Persian or in English language in medical journals that evaluated the effect of training on Iranian women's performance in Pap test based on HBM until October 2019. The main outcomes were all driven from HBM construct on uterine cervical screening. We excluded studies that used both cervical and breast screening together or other methods of study. The electronic sources reviewed in this study include PubMed, SID, Magiran, Scopus, and Web of Science. Our search was performed using the following key words: (“uterine cervical cancer” OR “uterine Cervical Neoplasm” OR “uterine cervical carcinoma”) AND (“Papa Nicola test” OR “pap smear” OR “pap test”) AND (“health belief model” OR “HBM” OR “health belief theory”) AND (“Iranian women” OR “Persian women”).

The two authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of studies to find all eligible studies and coded them based on the study entry to the next. In the second phase, the full text of the studies selected by the two authors was evaluated independently and the studies that content were entered into the next step were selected and studies related to the mention of the reason were excluded. Any disagreements through assessment or, if necessary, consultation with a third person has been resolved and a consensus strategy has been used. Identifying and eliminating duplicate studies and several reports from a study has been done.

Two authors evaluated the quality of studies according to the criteria of selection, methods for evaluating, the results, and analyzing the data using the Cochran risk of bias scale.[16] Seven domains related to risk of bias were assessed in each randomized controlled trial. Review authors' judgments were categorized as “low risk,” “high risk,” and “unclear risk” of bias.

To measure the outcomes of Pap smear education based on HBM constructs, the percentage and mean score of perceived susceptibility to cervical cancer, perceived severity to cervical cancer, benefits perceived to pap smear, barriers perceived to pap smear, and also self-efficacy to guidance for practice were compared between the intervention group and the control group after educational intervention. The study was conducted with the authors of the correspondence study to complete the information and studies that did not complete their data were deleted. The main effect size was calculated as standardized difference in means (SMD). We reported the results based on a random effects model because of high heterogeneity across studies. Cochrane Q-test (P < 0.05 as statistically significant) and I2 index were used to evaluate heterogeneity. All statistical analyses were done by Comprehensive Meta-analysis Version 2 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA).

  Results Top

The search was updated until October 2019; we screened a total of 387 records from the following databases: PubMed (48), SID (5), Magiran (100), Scopus (159), and Web of Science (75). In creating the report of this systematic review, we followed the PRISMA statement.[17] Accordingly, 200 articles were selected in the first step. After evaluating the quality of studies, 12 articles were introduced [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Study selection diagram

Click here to view

All of the 12 studies included in the final step had been conducted experimentally and semi-experimentally. The total number of samples in the empirical studies that were used to predict the factors influencing HBM-based Pap smear was 1605. The age range of women participating in the study and the conditions for entry into the study are the same in all studies and range from 16 to 60. All subjects were married and had sex relations, and the level of their education varied from illiterate to university education. Characteristics of studies included are reported in [Table 1].
Table 1: Characteristics of studies included

Click here to view

Based on the results of “Cochrane Risk of bias tool” assessment [Table 2], for random sequence generation, 4 trials were deemed to be at low risk,[18],[19],[20],[21],[22] and also for allocation concealment 2 trial were at high risk.[23],[24] Five trials did not report any attempt to blind assessors to treatment assignment[3],[19],[23],[25],[26] and five study did not blind.[22],[24],[27],[28],[29] In 2 trials, the participants/providers, or both were blinded to treatment allocation.[20],[21] Eight trials did not provide information about the number of participants allocated to groups at randomization[3],[19],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29] and four trials reported attrition bias.[20],[21],[22],[23] In 12 studies, the inclusion and exclusion criteria and selective outcome were clearly defined. The intervention and control groups were demonstrably comparable in 12 Trials.[3],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29]
Table 2: Risk of bias score in included studies

Click here to view

Eleven studies used the perceived susceptibility construct.[3],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29] In the result of meta-analysis, perceived susceptibility in women with education program improved significantly (SMD = 0.785; P = 0.002; confidence interval [CI] = 0.005–1.56; heterogeneity; P = 0.013; I2= 97%) [Figure 2].
Figure 2:Effects of education program on the women's perceived susceptibility

Click here to view

Twelve studies used perceived severity construct for performing Pap test.[3],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29] The education programs could also significantly improve perceived severity construct (SMD = 1.14; P = 0.001; CI = 0.66-1.62; heterogeneity; P < 0.001;I2= 92%) [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Effects of education program on the women's perceived severity

Click here to view

Eleven studies used perceived benefits construct;[3],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29] a combination of findings showed that perceived benefits improved significantly among women who received education program (SMD = 1.25; P = 0.001; CI = 0.545–0.135; heterogeneity; P = 0.003; I2= 97%) [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Effects of education program on the women's perceived benefits

Click here to view

Twelve studies used perceived barrier construct.[3],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29] This meta-analysis result showed that cervical screening education programs can statistically significantly improve perceived barrier construct (SMD = 0.20; P = 0.001; CI = 0.44–1.24; heterogeneity; P < 0.001; I2= 92%) [Figure 5].
Figure 5: Effects of education program on the women's perceived barrier

Click here to view

“Self-efficacy” was the construct that had been used in five studies.[20],[23],[25],[27],[28] A combination of findings showed that education programs can also statistically significantly improve perceived self-efficacy construct (SMD = 0.638; P < 0.001; CI = 1.76–0.426; heterogeneity; P < 0.001; I2= 97%) [Figure 6].
Figure 6: Effects of education program on the women's perceived self-efficacy

Click here to view

  Discussion Top

In this study, training based on the HBM in all of the constructs was effective on the women's performance for performing the Pap test. Heterogeneity was high between included studies that assessed the effect of education program on heath belief model construct. Excluding one by one study did not make any change at degree of heterogeneity.

To investigate the perceived susceptibility construct in the HBM, the individuals' concerns about cervical cancer, perception of proneness to disease, and sense of risk which are usually examined[28],[30] were significantly effective that is comparable to another review about cervical screening test.[31] This construct was not significantly effective after education in Bushehr city, which might be related to their few number of training sessions and low rate of interaction between the participants and the trainer.[21],[22]

To investigate the perceived severity construct in the HBM, several aspects were studied, including how hazardous the cervical cancer disease,[32] individual's perception of seriousness and severity of the disease, and whether the disease could jeopardize their lives.[28] In two studies in Kurdistan Province, training had no effect on the perceived severity construct in the training group.[21],[28] It is clear that native personnel with sufficient skills and fluency in the native language of the region can effectively motivate lay people and improve their performance in Pap test.

The perceived benefits construct deals with early diagnosis of cervical cancer and its on-time treatment. Attempts to make women believe usefull[28],[33] were more effective after education in this meta-analysis that is consistent with another review study.[34] Based on the results of the study, the effectiveness of the training provided for the women requires different attitude and performance as well as localization of the trainings.

This meta-analysis result showed that training can lead to significant changes in the mean score of the perceived barriers construct after intervention between the training and control group. This is the only construct that has been significant in all of the included studies in this meta-analysis, which indicates effectiveness and usefulness of the educational interventions in this regard. According to a review study in Asia, shame and virginity, distrust of health system, fear from pain, anxiety and lack of health provider recommendations were the major barriers of performing the Pap test in a conceptual framework based in the HBM.[28] Based on another review study result, the HBM is very powerful in perception of the behavior construct and very weak in perceptions of the disease construct.[34]

According to the study results, the self-efficacy construct of the health belief improved the Iranian women's ability of perceiving the health staff's explanations, asking questions from the physician, perceiving the necessity of examination, and ability of providing appropriate explanations for others, as well as ability for the next referral and performing the Pap test.[35] Based on the study's results, appropriate training program must be provided in such a way that can bold the individual's role to perceive the value of health and also perform self-care during her healthiness.[36] These might increase power and control of indivisual on health as well as confidence and self-efficacy.[37] Self-efficacy is the most important prerequisite of change in behavior.[38] The results of this meta-analysis were same with another review results in ethnic minority women.[39]

Some of the limitations of the present study included the few number of studies on the effect of training based on the HBM on performing the Pap test in Iranian women. Alsothe majority of the studied samples were allocated from individual medical centers, which might not be good representatives of the Iranian women's population. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive educational program in Iran for providing information on cervical cancer and Pap test. Since preventive and health beliefs and behaviors in any society are founded on sociocultural grounds and the women's health beliefs have significant impacts on accepting the cancer screening methods, we had selected only Iranian studies for meta-analysis. With regard to the weaknesses and strengths of the HBM in performance Pap test, it is proposed to conduct studies to compare this model with other effective models in screening, such as behavior change model. Finally we recommend that future studies utilize the strong points of each model to compile and develop the educational content of the cervical cancer-specific group training sessions in order to execute it in all health stations and provincial centers.

  Conclusion Top

Cervical screening education program based on the HBM can be effective on Iranian women performance in their perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived barrier, and perceived self-efficacy about Pap smear test.


This study was supported by the Student Research Committee and Reproductive Health Research Center of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was supported by the Student Research Committee and Reproductive Health Research Center of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Miller AB, World Health Organization. Cervical Cancer Screening Programmes: Managerial Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.  Back to cited text no. 1
Mohebi S, Sharifirad G, Gharlipour Z, Kamran A. The study of pap smear conduction and its related factors based on Health Belief Model in Women Referring to Health Care Centers in Qom During 2014. J Educ Community Health. 2016;2:25-33.  Back to cited text no. 2
Vasheghani F, Majlesi F, Mahmoudi M, Shojaeezadeh D. Effect of educational intervention based on Health Belief Model on knowledge and attitude about pap smear test among female secondary school teachers in district 11 of Tehran. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research. 2012;10:39-46.  Back to cited text no. 3
Yakhforushha A, Solhi M, Azar FE. Effects of education via health belief model on knowledge and attitude of voluntary health workers regarding Pap smear in urban centers of Qazvin. Adv Nurs Midwifery 2008;18: 27-33.  Back to cited text no. 4
Namdar A, Bigizadeh S, Naghizadeh MM. Measuring health belief model components in adopting preventive behaviors of cervical cancer. JFUMS 2012;2:34-44.  Back to cited text no. 5
Orumaa M, Leinonen MK, Campbell S, Møller B, Myklebust TA, Nygard M. Recent increase in incidence of cervical precancerous lesions in Norway: Nationwide study from 1992 to 2016. Int J Cancer 2019;145:2629-38.  Back to cited text no. 6
Morowatisharifabad MA, Norouzi S, Layeghy S, Norouzi A. Survey of Cervix Cancer screening determinants among 20-65 years old women based on health belief model in Lordegan, Chahar Mahal Bakhtiyaree, 2009. Tolooebehdasht. 2013;12:98-106.  Back to cited text no. 7
Mahdavifar M, Sabzevari S, Fasihi HT. Using Health Belief Model for Assessing Health Believes about Papsmear in Women Referred to Health Care Centers in Bandar Abbas, Iran. J Health Develop 2015:4:133-45.  Back to cited text no. 8
Simbar M, Aarabi Z, Keshavarz Z, Ramezani-Tehrani F, Baghestani AR. Promotion of physical activity of adolescents by skill-based health education. Health Educ 2017;117:207-14.  Back to cited text no. 9
Taymoori P, Niknami S, Ghofranipour F. Cognitive and Psychosocial Factors of Physical Activities among Adolescents in Sanandaj by Frame Work of Pender's Health Promotion and Stage of Change Models (2006). J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci 2008;11: 393-406.  Back to cited text no. 10
Fathian Z, Sharifirad GR, Hasanzadeh A. Study of the effects of Behavioral Intention Model education on reducing the cesarean rate among pregnant women of Khomeiny-Shahr, Isfahan, in 2006. 2007.  Back to cited text no. 11
Moshki M, Dehnoalian A, Alami A. Effect of precede–proceed model on preventive behaviors for type 2 diabetes mellitus in high-risk individuals. Clin Nurs Res 2017;26:241-53.  Back to cited text no. 12
Keshavarz Z, Simbar M, Ramezankhani A. Factors for performing breast and cervix cancer screening by Iranian female workers: A qualitative-model study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011;12:1517-22.  Back to cited text no. 13
Simbar M, Shayan Menesh M, Nahidi F, Akbar Zadeh AR. Health beliefs of midwives about HIV/AIDS protection and the barriers to reducing risk of infection: An Iranian study. Leadersh Health Serv 2011;24:106-17.  Back to cited text no. 14
Simbar M, Ramezani Tehrani F, Hashemi Z. Sexual-reproductive health belief model of college students. Iran South Med J 2004;7:70-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
Higgins JP, Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savović J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928.  Back to cited text no. 16
Moher D, Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine 2009;4: 264-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
Abraido-Lanza AF, Chao MT, Gates CY. Acculturation and cancer screening among Latinas: Results from the national health interview survey. Ann Behav Med 2005;29:22-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
Hazavehei SM, Rahmati M, Hasanzade A. Effect of educational program based on health belief model on the practice of women about Pap smear. J Health Care Health Educ Suppl 2014; Health Education supplement:1858-67.  Back to cited text no. 19
Shobeiri F, Javad MT, Parsa P, Roshanaei G. Effects of group training based on the health belief model on knowledge and behavior regarding the Pap smear test in Iranian women: A quasi-experimental study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016;17:2871-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
Tahmasebi R, Hosseini F, Noroozi A. The effect of education based on the health belief model on women's practice about pap smear test. HAYAT 2016;21:80-92.  Back to cited text no. 21
Hossaini F, Tahmasebi R, Noroozi A. Comparing the effects of individual and group training methods based on health belief model on the belief and practice of Bushehr women regarding pap smear test. J Health 2017;7:668-79.  Back to cited text no. 22
Daryani S, Shojaeezadeh D, Batebi A, Charati JY, Naghibi A. The effect of education based on a health belief model in women's practice with regard to the Pap smear test. J Cancer Policy 2016;8:51-6.  Back to cited text no. 23
Rakhshani F, Jalilian F, Mirzaei Alavijeh M, Zinat Motlagh F, Aghaei A, Ahmadi-Jouibari T. Pap smear test among women: An educational intervention based on health belief model. J Birjand Univ Med Sci 2013;20:136-43.  Back to cited text no. 24
Karimy M, Azarpira H, Araban M. Using health belief model constructs to examine differences in adherence to pap test recommendations among Iranian women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2017;18:1389-94.  Back to cited text no. 25
Khiyali Z, Manoochri M, Babaei Heydarabadi A, Mobasheri F. Educational intervention on preventive behaviors on gestational diabetes in pregnant women: Application of health belief model. Int J Pediat 2017;5:4821-31.  Back to cited text no. 26
Baghianimoghadam MH, Khajedehi Z, Rahimi T, Jowzi F. The effect of educational intervention based on health belief model constructs on performing Pap smear in Yazd. J Health Care 2018;20:72-81.  Back to cited text no. 27
Bahmani A, Gharib A, Rahmani K, Ahmadian F, Alizadeh Z, Akhtar B. Effect of health belief model education on the participation of rural women in papsmear test. J Nurs Educ 2016;5:34-40.  Back to cited text no. 28
Pirzadeh A, Mazaheri MA. The effect of education on women's practice based on the health belief model about pap smear test. Int J Prev Med 2012;3:585-90.  Back to cited text no. 29
Byrd TL, Peterson SK, Chavez R, Heckert A. Cervical cancer screening beliefs among young Hispanic women. Health Care Women Int 2004;38:192-7.  Back to cited text no. 30
Saei Ghare Naz M, Kariman N, Ebadi A, Ozgoli G, Ghasemi V, Rashidi Fakari F. Educational interventions for cervical cancer screening behavior of women: A systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018;19:875-84.  Back to cited text no. 31
Karimy M, Gallali M, Niknami S, Aminshokravi F, & Tavafian S. The effect of health education program based on health belief model on the performance of Pap smear test among women referring to health care centers in Zarandieh. J Jahrom Univ Med Sci 2012;10:53-9.  Back to cited text no. 32
Allahverdipour H, Emami A. Perceptions of cervical cancer threat, benefits, and barriers of Papanicolaou smear screening programs for women in Iran. Women Health 2008;47:23-37.  Back to cited text no. 33
Tanner-Smith EE, Brown TN. Evaluating the health belief model: A critical review of studies predicting mammographic and pap screening. Soc Theory Health 2010;8:95-125.  Back to cited text no. 34
McFarland DM. Cervical cancer and pap smear screening in Botswana: Knowledge and perceptions. Int Nurs Rev 2003;50:167-75.  Back to cited text no. 35
Taebi M, Riazi H, Keshavarz Z, Afrakhteh M. Knowledge and Attitude Toward Human Papillomavirus and HPV Vaccination in Iranian Population: A Systematic Review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2019;20:1945–1949.  Back to cited text no. 36
Fallahi A, Nemat Shahrbabaki B, Hashemian M, Ahmadi Kahanali A. The needs of women referring to health care centers for doing Pap smear Test. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2016;6:1-10.  Back to cited text no. 37
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977;84:191-215.  Back to cited text no. 38
Johnson CE, Mues KE, Mayne SL, Kiblawi AN. Cervical cancer screening among immigrants and ethnic minorities: A systematic review using the health belief model. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2008;12:232-41.  Back to cited text no. 39


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


Previous article  Next article
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded162    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal