Disciplinary-based information literacy skills among medical students
Sirous Panahi1, Abbas Mirzaei2, Azam Bazrafshan2
1 Department of Medical Library and Information Science; Health Management and Economics Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
|Date of Submission||12-Feb-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||14-Mar-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||28-Jul-2020|
Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
INTRODUCTION: Disciplinary-based information literacy (DIL) or professional-related information literacy has not been widely studied in the academic context, including medical sciences. This study aimed at investigating the status of DIL among medical students in an Iranian medical university.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional survey. A random sample consisting of 298 students majoring in general medicine at Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran, in the academic year of 2018–2019 completed a valid and reliable 20-item questionnaire on DIL. Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software.
RESULTS: Participants' DIL was less than expected, especially in the skills related to professional information access and evaluation. The majority of them had low DIL level. However, medical students in their last 2 years of study had significantly high scores in DIL than those in their first 2 years of study.
CONCLUSION: Information literacy has not been seriously considered in health-related higher education in Iran. It is needed to consider DIL in the medical curriculum for training students to be proficient specialists in medical practice.
Keywords: Disciplinary-based information literacy, information literacy, Iran, medical students, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
|How to cite this article:|
Panahi S, Mirzaei A, Bazrafshan A. Disciplinary-based information literacy skills among medical students. J Edu Health Promot 2020;9:172
|How to cite this URL:|
Panahi S, Mirzaei A, Bazrafshan A. Disciplinary-based information literacy skills among medical students. J Edu Health Promot [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 13];9:172. Available from: https://www.jehp.net/text.asp?2020/9/1/172/290929
| Introduction|| |
As an extended concept of traditional literacy, information literacy is necessary in the information age and facilitates our interactions with the information-embedded world. Information literacy necessitates developing critical thinking, knowing information search strategies, familiarity with information resources, effective use of accessed information, and so on. Information literacy skills are needed for lifelong learning.
Educational institutes should aim at teaching their students how to learn independently in order to enhance their educational and career achievements. Information literacy is a tool for such learning. Therefore, the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) published Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education in 2000. Five main standards (with several performance and output indicators) have been included in these standards. The standards measure students' abilities and skills in determining their information needs, effectively accessing their needed information, critically evaluating accessed information, appropriately using information, and understanding and applying ethical, economic, and social aspects in accessing and using information in different contexts.
These general standards have been subjected to many practical studies in different contexts worldwide, e.g., for determining medical students' information skills in Nigeria and for measuring the information literacy status and the use of information technology among medical students in Iran.
The relationship between information literacy and professional fields can be explained based on the role of education and education-related skills in professional achievement. Therefore, information literacy can be divided into basic or general and disciplinary-based or professional ones. The former considers one's basic and general skills in information-related affairs, and the latter focuses on those of one's special skills relating to his/her educational field and academic profession. However, disciplinary-based information literacy (DIL) has not been well considered in academic fields and scientific disciplines, including medicine.
Information literacy is an urgent need for students to integrate their basic knowledge and acquired information and to interact with information for education, work, and entertainment, as well as improving their research, educational, and professional performance. In addition, training students with innovative, creative, and entrepreneurship skills as factors of a successful education system necessitates information literacy skills.
Medical students need information literacy skills to be innovative and creative in their careers. This can prepare medical learners to do their disciplinary-based duties with high quality. In addition, medical students acquire university education for being trained in lifelong learning as well as serving as health information providers and medical practitioners. Therefore, it is vital for them to be information literate in their profession. DIL can help medical students in acquiring and integrating professional information for solving medical problems and being better in their practices.
In spite of much research on the general or basic information literacy skills, few has been done on the disciplinary-based/professional information literacy skills among students majoring in different scientific fields, including among others, medical students. This study aimed at investigating the status of disciplinary-based information skills among medical students in an Iranian medical university as well as comparing the skills of the first year and the final year medical students.
| Research Methods|| |
This study used a cross-sectional descriptive survey method conducted in the academic year of 2018–2019. The study population included all medical students majoring in general medicine in the Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Based on the data delivered by the educational deputy of the university, about 2378 medical students were studying in the university in the academic year of 2018–2019 (13th Statistical Yearbook 2019). Out of them, 331 students were selected randomly as the study sample.
A questionnaire was designed based on some related works in the field of information literacy,,, by main focus on the medical disciplinary-based content. The questionnaire included an introduction, asking participants to voluntarily complete the questionnaire. It included twenty multi-option one-choice items on the DIL, in addition to some demographic and background questions. These items were related to the five components of information literacy, as noted by the ACRL (2000) in its five main information literacy standards (i.e., information know, access, evaluation, use, and acknowledgment). Each item had a true response and one or more false ones. True answer for each item was rated 1 and false answer was rated 0. As a result, the minimum and maximum scores of a student could be 0 and 20, respectively. Scores below 7, between 7 and 14, and over 14 were considered as low, moderate, and high DIL levels, respectively. The midpoint score was 10. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated by Cronbach's alpha coefficient which equaled to 79%, and its validity was confirmed by two medical as well as two library and information science experts.
After gathering and completing data extracted from 298 fully completed questionnaires, data were transferred to SPSS 22, SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA, Descriptive statistics (frequencies, means, and standard deviations) and analytical statistics (t-test and Mann–Whitney U-test) were applied in the confidence interval of 0.95 (P < 0.05) for data analysis.
| Results|| |
Based on the respondents' demographic information, 173 (58%) and 125 (42%) of them were female and male students, respectively. Their mean age was 21.22 ± 3.01 years. Of them, 78 (26%) and 102 (34%) were in their first and last 2 study years, respectively. Of them, 118 (40%) were in their middle study years (the third–fifth study years).
[Table 1] shows the mean score of students in DIL. As can be seen, their DIL was estimated as 8.62, which was considered as the moderate level (between 7 and 14).
For studying the possible significant difference between students' DIL mean score and the midpoint score, one-sample t-test was used. As [Table 2] depicts, students' DIL mean score was significantly lower than expected (t[df = 297]= −13.719, P < 0.01).
|Table 2: Results of one sample t-test for comparing students DIL mean score and midpoint (n=298)|
Click here to view
[Table 3] shows the number of students based on the level of their DIL scores as well as their mean scores in each level. As can be seen, the highest number of students (158, 53%) had the low level in DIL (M = 6.72).
Based on Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test, the distribution of data on DIL scores of the first and last 2 years' students was not a normal distribution (Z = 0.133, P < 0.01). Therefore, Mann–Whitney U-test was used for comparing data. [Table 4] shows the results of Mann–Whitney U-test for comparing students' DIL mean scores in their first and last 2 study years. Students in their last 2 study years had significantly higher mean score than those in their first 2 study years (U[n1 = 36,n2 = 51]= 6558.00, P < 0.05). It is notable that the difference between the means was low and estimated as 1.23.
|Table 4: Mann-Whitney U test for comparing the first 2 year and last 2 year students' DIL scores (n=180)|
Click here to view
The status of students in DIL components was measured for investigating their skills in searching, evaluating, using, and recognizing the needed information. [Table 5] depicts the mean scores of the students in the components of DIL in detail. As can be seen, they had the highest (10.38) and lowest (6.84) scores in information know and information evaluation, respectively.
| Discussion|| |
Aiming at evaluating the DIL among medical students in an Iranian university, this study found that the status of this literacy was low among the students, and their DIL amount was in the middle level, less than what it was expected. Other studies in Iran on other disciplines and universities, e.g.,, showed the low level of students' basic information literacy skills. However, they did not study DIL.
In addition, the majority of studied students in our study had low-level DIL. As the studied students were from one of the main medical universities in Iran, this situation may be the case in other similar universities. These findings show that the higher education in Iran's health system paid no much attention to students' information literacy skills needed for their research, education, and practice. Despite their importance, information literacy concepts are absent from the related curricula.
Considering the significant difference between the DIL mean scores of 1st year and last year students, it can be said that students' continuous encounter with research and scientific information during their study years can improve their DIL. Emde and Emmett emphasized that this improvement is natural due to students' continuous encounter with research and scientific information during their study years. However, the low difference between the mean scores of these two student groups reflects the low effect of university health education on medical students' DIL levels, too.
Considering the components of DIL, it was found that the students had the lowest mean score in evaluating information, followed by accessing information. This finding emphasized the importance of training them in information search and evaluation skills and approaches for reaching the best results needed for satisfying their professional information needs. Evaluative skills need critical thinking as a main acquirement for information literacy.
One of the success factors in higher education and a way to reach an effective and knowledge-based economics is the information literacy. This is true in case of medical sciences as Carrollet al. showed. They found that students that received information literacy training on topics related to medical entrepreneurship and health-care economics showed significantly improved performance on some aspects of health-care economics. Our findings, however, reflect the lack of an integrated curriculum related to skills needed for information literate students of the information age. An information literacy-embedded curriculum is needed in medical fields, as done in microbiology field by Brown and Krumholz. They integrated a course on information literacy into the curriculum and found a considerable educational achievement among students. Such an integrated curriculum needs continuous cooperation of responsible individuals and their enough training, as well as considering the requirements of each discipline. In addition, other training programs need to be hold in this case in the absence of such a curriculum. The information literate university is an approach of future successful university where information literate staff and faculty members interact with information literacy-integrated curriculum for training information literate students. Such a university in the health education is an urgent need.
| Conclusion|| |
This study would create awareness among medical students and other ones responsible for their education on the need to involve in information literacy learning in order to be information literate professionals who are able to do effective and efficient use of professional information resources relating to their career development and practice achievement.
As a quantitative survey, this study had limitations related to its methodological approach. Measuring information literacy with a paper-and-pencil approach may reduce some full benefits and findings; however, this study is an exploratory descriptive research that was conducted for studying the DIL for the first time. Further research is necessary for deeply investigating the status of basic and DIL skills among students majoring in other medical-related fields and various educational levels. In addition to its help in informing Iranian medical academic society about the status of DIL skills among medical students, this study can contribute to information literacy literature by introducing the new concept of “disciplinary-based information literacy,” a concept that needs to be extended theoretically and practically by other researchers worldwide.
We would like to thank the cooperation of students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences which helped us in successful completion of this study.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Mackey TP, Jacobson TE. Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy. Coll Res Lib 2011;72:62-78.
Bruce CS. Information literacy as a catalyst for educational change. A background paper. In: Danaher PA, editor. Lifelong Learning: Whose Responsibility and What is Your Contribution?, The 3rd
International Lifelong Learning Conference. Yeppoon, Queensland: Central Queensland University Press; 2004. p. 8-19.
Bruce CS. Workplace experiences of information literacy. Int J Inf Manag. 1999;1933-47.
Baro EE, Endouware BC, Ubogu JO. Information literacy among medical students in the College of Health Sciences in Niger Delta University, Nigeria. Program 2011;45:107-20.
Bazrafkan L, Hayat AA, Abbasi K, Bazrafkan A, Rohalamini A, Fardid M. Evaluation of information literacy status among medical students at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. J Adv Med Educ Prof 2017;5:42-8.
Farrell R, Badke W. Situating information literacy in the disciplines: A practical and systematic approach for academic librarians. Ref Serv Rev 2015;43:319-40.
Bruce C, Edwards S, Lupton M. Six frames for information literacy education: A conceptual framework for interpreting the relationships between theory and practice. Innov Teach Lean Inf Comp Sci 2006;5:1-18.
Carroll AJ, Hallman SJ, Umstead KA, McCall J, DiMeo AJ. Using information literacy to teach medical entrepreneurship and health care economics. J Med Libr Assoc 2019;107:163-71.
Akpovire E, Olawoyin O, Adebayo O, Esse U. Role of information literacy skills on use of information resources by medical students in Lagos state. Lib Philos Pract 2019;2019:2148.
Mittermeyer D, Quirion D, Archambault C, Carrier P, Grant S, Guilmette P, et al
., editors. Information Literacy: Study of IncomingFirst-Year Undergraduates in Quebec. Karen Nicholson, M.A.: M.L.I.S.; 2003.
Beile P. Development and validation of the beile test of information literacy for education (B-TILED). AREA Annual Conference. Montreal, Canada; 2005.
Emde J, Emmett A. Assessing information literacy skills using the ACRL standards as a guide. Ref Serv Rev 2007;35:210-29.
Abbasi A, Najafloo P. Assessment of information literacy of agricultural postgraduate students at Tarbiat Modares University, Iran. Res Agri Manag Educ 2015;34:89-103.
Sadeghi M, Taraghikhah N. The level of students' information literacy based on the information literacy standards for the higher education students (ACRL). Libr Inf Sci Inf Technol 2016;8:1-18.
White AM. Information literacy and critical thinking in higher education: Some considerations. Handbook of Research on Critical Thinking and Teacher Education Pedagogy IGI Global; 2019. p. 367-81.
Virkus S. Information literacy in Europe: A literature review. Inf Res 2003;8:159.
Brown C, Krumholz LR. Integrating information literacy into the science curriculum. Coll Res Lib 2002;63:111-23.
Yevelson-Shorsher A, Bronstein J. Three perspectives on information literacy in academia: Talking to librarians, faculty, and students. Coll Res Lib. 2018;79:535-53.
Webber S. Information literacy in higher education. In: Stopar K, Rabzeljl L, editors. Information Literacy between Theory and Practice: The Role of Academic and Special Libraries. Ljubljana: ZBDS; 2006. p. 9-20.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]