The effect of problem-solving-based interprofessional learning on critical thinking and satisfaction with learning of nursing and midwifery students
Fereshteh Aein1, RaziehSadat Hosseini2, Ladan Naseh3, Farhanak Safdari1, Shayesteh Banaian1
1 Community-Oriented Nursing Midwifery Research Center, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
2 Nursing Care Research Center, School of Nursing an Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Sharekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
|Date of Submission||23-Oct-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||06-Jan-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||28-May-2020|
Dr. Fereshteh Aein
Community-Oriented Nursing Midwifery Research Center, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Rahmateeh, Shahrekord
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
INTRODUCTION: Problem-solving skills and learner-centered approaches provide students with the ability to solve health challenges by placing them in simulated situations. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of inter-professional learning based on problem-solving on critical thinking (CT) and satisfaction with learning experience in nursing and midwifery students.
METHODS: This quazi-experimental study of a single group used pretest–posttest design. 20 undergraduate nursing and 28 midwifery students at the final academic year participated in the study. The research intervention was interprofessional learning based on problem-solving conducted in five 2-h training sessions. California's CT Scale and 10-point visual analog scale were used to measure CT skills and satisfaction with learning before and after the intervention. Finally, data were analyzed by SPSS software version 23 using descriptive statistics and paired t-test.
RESULTS: The findings of this study indicated that the mean score of students' CT before the intervention was poor, while it statistically significant increased after the intervention (P < 0.05). It was also found that students' satisfaction with learning, in the scale of 0–10, was reported from 5 to 9 indicating students had a high level of satisfaction with their learning experience.
DISCUSSION: Based on the findings, it can be concluded that the interprofessional education based on problem-solving has been able to significantly enhance the overall critical skills of students, especially in the dimensions of analysis, inference, and deductive reasoning, and also, students' satisfaction with learning experience was also increased.
Keywords: Critical thinking, interprofessional, midwifery, nursing, problem-solving
|How to cite this article:|
Aein F, Hosseini R, Naseh L, Safdari F, Banaian S. The effect of problem-solving-based interprofessional learning on critical thinking and satisfaction with learning of nursing and midwifery students. J Edu Health Promot 2020;9:109
|How to cite this URL:|
Aein F, Hosseini R, Naseh L, Safdari F, Banaian S. The effect of problem-solving-based interprofessional learning on critical thinking and satisfaction with learning of nursing and midwifery students. J Edu Health Promot [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 May 11];9:109. Available from: https://www.jehp.net/text.asp?2020/9/1/109/285160
| Introduction|| |
In the twenty- first century following health, educational, economic, and social challenges, educated healthcare professionals are expected to have high level of problem-solving skills to work in complex clinical situations. Both nurses and midwifes must maintain a high level of vigilance and clinical judgment to detect early changes in patient status signaling the need for intervention. This ability requires critical thinking (CT), problem-solving, and communication skills., CT was defined as “purposeful, self-regulatory judgment which results in interpretation, analysis, evaluation and inference, as well as an explanation of the evidential and conceptual, methodological, criteriological, or contextual considerations upon which judgment is based”. These are important for the development of CT skills, which nurses and midwifes require to perform their daily functions in practice.,
Studies carried out in Iran found that the nursing and midwifery students were low skilled in CT and their Critical Thinking Skills (CTS) did not significantly change during their preregistration program. Thus it may be concluded that the nursing and midwifery education program did not affect the CTS of its students.,, On the other hand, the development and measurement of CT skills in undergraduate midwifery students is vital to ensure they are able to apply CT to practice and decision-making. The application of CT in nursing and midwifery practice is complex, and multiple lenses are required to capture its' depth and breadth.,,
Moreover, collaboration and highly integrated teamwork among healthcare professionals are essential to patient safety and quality of care. Traditional academic learning does not facilitate the interaction of students with other health professionals. During clinical education, students have very little opportunity to interact with other health professionals, which limits professional socialization. A learning method based on problem-solving provides the opportunity to enhance interpersonal skills and teamwork and bridges the gap between theory and practice in healthcare area.
Interprofessional learning has recently been taken into consideration by medical and nursing faculties. It is broadly defined as a teaching and learning process that fosters collaborative work between two or more healthcare profession. And refers to situations where two or more health care providers from different disciplines learn from each other and about each other to improve the quality of care. In fact, interprofessional education has been considered as an educational creativity that includes interactive learning between different disciplines that aims at enhancing collaborative performance. This training is one of the innovative methods that encourage students from different disciplines to communicate and interact with each other in a professional team. Such an educational method gives students of different disciplines the opportunity to actively work to solve problems, thus, it prepares them for clinical practice in the future and helps them to achieve good professional communication through respect for each other's roles.
Studies conducted in different countries have examined the interprofessional education among different students in clinical settings and showed its positive effects on students' satisfaction with learning experience and their understanding of other professions through their roles by changing their attitude and behavior toward interprofessional collaboration.,,,
There are systematic reviews on the effects of interprofessional education on different outcomes in medical students. For example, a systematic review by Lapkin et al. has also shown that, the majority of studies have been conducted on nursing and medical students, but very few studies have been conducted on the students of other medical disciplines. Findings of this review have demonstrated that, students' attitudes and perceptions of inter-professional collaboration and decision making can be increased through inter-professional training. Guraya and Barr in their systematic review and meta-analysis highlighted significant improvements in pre and post-status scores after embedding IPE module in various medical fields as determined by enhanced acquisition of knowledge, skills, and attitudes of learners. However, more research is needed to explore other educational outcomes of students. A newer systematic review conducted by Vuurberg et al., reported positive outcomes of teaching preclinical students from medicine and other health care professions. In conclusion, overall IPE seems a promising approach for attitudinal change and to some extent, learning but the clarity about its higher order effects such as CT are still lacking.
It seems that, the combined use of inter-professional education and problem-solving learning can help to increase the learning motivation, self-directed learning and satisfaction with learning experience in interdisciplinary subjects,,, but their effectiveness on CT of nursing and midwifery students is unclear. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the effect of inter-professional learning based on problem-solving on CT and satisfaction with learning of nursing and midwifery students.
| Methods|| |
This was a quazi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest design to investigate the effect of inter-professional learning based on problem-solving on CT and satisfaction with learning of nursing and midwifery students.
Students in the final academic year of nursing (n = 20) and midwifery (n = 28) from the nursing faculty of the Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran, who had enrolled in clinical course were invited to participate in this study.
The study had been approved by the ethical committee of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran (number 10-3-92). Informed and written consent was obtained from all participants prior to commencement. They were informed that it would be free to change to the traditional teaching strategy at any time without effects on their course evaluation.
California CT Scale was used to measure students' CT. This scale has 5 sub-scales of analysis (9 items), evaluation (14 items), inference (11 items), deductive reasoning (16 items) and inductive reasoning (14 items). This scale was previously used by Khalili and Zadeh  in Iran and its validity and reliability have been confirmed (−α = 62%–67%). This scale contains 34 multi-choice items with the scores of 0–34, and each sub-scale scores from 0 to 12. Scores below 11 from the total scale indicates the lack of CT, scores of 11–25 shows moderate CT, and scores of over 25 indicates the strong CT. Score of 4 or less for each subscale is a sign of weak CT and score of 7 or higher illustrates stronger CT skill.
For adaptation process of CCTS we used backward-forward translation technique. All questionnaire items were translated into Persian by two bilingual experts, and then translated back into English by two different translators. Then a panel of two other bilingual experts was invited to evaluate consistency between the English and Persian version of the questionnaire. As a result, 94% consensus was achieved.
To measure satisfaction from the learning experience, the question; “How satisfied are you with your learning experience during this internship?” was asked from the participants using the Visual Analogue Scale with 10 scores (strongly dissatisfied = 0, highly satisfied = 10) as a self-report.
The mothers and neonates nursing and the medical-surgical care in pregnancy modules were selected for implementing the study intervention for nursing and midwifery students respectively. Before starting the intervention, students of both disciplines completed the demographic information questionnaire including age, sex, marital status, total grade, and California CT Scale as pretest.
The inter-professional learning module for clinical mother and neonate nursing: Participants included two equal groups of 14 nursing students who enrolled in clinical mother and neonate care and 4 midwifery students volunteered as the tutors and one of the faculty members of the midwifery department as facilitator in each group. During four rounds consisting of 2 h/month, real mothers during labor or neonates needing care after birth were discussed by the students of both disciplines in a classroom context; for example one scenario discussed a new mother who complaining of mass bleeding 2 h after delivery. Nursing students should determine which assessment and intervention were required to solve this problem.
The inter-professional learning module for clinical medical-surgical care: 20 students in the final academic year of midwifery who were attending the medical-surgical training course accompanied by 3 nursing students as tutors and one of faculty members of medical-surgical nursing department as facilitator participated in rounds of problem solving based Interprofessional Learning (IPL). There were four rounds consisting of 2 h/month. During these rounds, real women with medical problems; surgery during pregnancy or obstetric/gynecologic surgery were discussed between the students of both disciplines in a classroom context. For example, one scenario involved a 29-year-old pregnant women in 28 weeks of gestational age who presented to the emergency prenatal unit with acute abdominal pain. The midwifery students should determine the cause of the event based on their detailed assessment and the appropriate interventions. Students did not know which disease scenario would be discussed in each round.
During both inter-professional modules, tutorial students started the discussion by reading hand-off designed for their respective scenario. Then the students of the two disciplines were required to actively participate to identify problems, prioritize problems, goal setting and appropriate interventions for identified problems. Then, presented ideas were discussed.
After completing IPL sessions, CT and satisfaction with learning experience in both groups were assessed as post-tests.
The data were analyzed using SPSS version 23 (by IBM Corporation, United States), and for the subjects' general characteristics, descriptive statistics such as means, and standard deviations were used. For data analysis we pooled the data from all midwifery and nursing participants as one total group. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was conducted to test the normality of the data, and a paired t-test was performed to examine the effects of the IPL intervention. All values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
| Results|| |
Totally, 48 students participated in the study. All samples were females with the mean age of 21. The results of data analysis showed that, the mean score of students' CT before the study was poor (10.1 ± 2.9), while it increased after the intervention (12.8 ± 3.4). The results of paired t-test showed that, this increase was statistically significant (P < 0.100). The findings of study regarding the CT of students in each of the subdomains of CT are summarized in [Table 1]. As the table shows, despite the increase in mean scores of CT after intervention, the level of CT of students before and after the intervention in all dimensions was weak, but the results of paired t-test showed that, in 3 domains of CT including analysis, inference and deductive reasoning, the students' mean CT scores after the intervention were significantly increased (P < 0.05). However, in the domains of evaluation and inductive reasoning, the increase was not significant (P > 0.05) [Table 1].
|Table 1: Descriptive indexes and comparing the average critical thinking before and after the intervention using paired t-test|
Click here to view
In regard to the students' satisfaction with learning experience, the findings of the study showed that, student satisfaction in the scale of 0–10 were at minimum 5 and maximum 9 with a mean of 1 ± 7.5, meaning that, on average, students had a moderate to high degree of satisfaction from their learning experience. Also, in regard to the relationship between educational program, and CT and satisfaction with learning experience, the Spearman's statistical test showed no significant correlation (P > 0.05).
| Discussion|| |
This study examined the effect of inter-professional learning based on problem solving on CT and satisfaction with learning of nursing and midwifery students. The findings of this study showed that, inter-professional learning based on problem-solving led to improve CT of all students in the domains of analysis, reasoning and deduction inference, as well as moderate to high satisfaction of students with learning experience.
The results showed that, students had low CT skills in all domains of CT before the intervention, confirming the findings of other studies conducted in many Iranian universities. For example, studies of Karimi Mounaghi et al., Azizi-Fini et al., Hajrezayi et al. and Hemmati Maslak Pak et al.on nursing students in Iranian universities showed that, the average CT of the last year students was 10.8 that is similar to the present study.,,, Most studies also showed poor CT skills in nursing and midwifery students.,,,
Unlikely, study from America reported CT skills in nursing students at approximately high level. In Korea, the average score of student'S CT skill was 56.72 out of 100. It seems that, the scores obtained in this study and other Iranian studies are less than those in foreign countries. This difference in the level of CT scores can be attributed to the differences in the use of effective ways of fostering CT among countries, in a way that, the use of participatory and problem-based learning in countries like the United States has started much earlier than us. Moreover, in Iran, the nursing educational system was performing at the lowest level of cognition; and higher levels of learning such as analysis and evaluation were less considered, and in general, very little attention was given to developing CT According to Kermansaravi et al., there are major and serious barriers to developing CT of students, one of which is the use of traditional teaching methods in the current education system that prevent the development of problem-solving and decision-making skills in learners, which subsequently limit the students' CT opportunities.
Kong et al. in a meta-analysis study stated that, problem solving education can help nursing students improve their CT. The findings of this study showed that, inter-professional learning based on problem solving has been able to significantly increase the overall skill of students' CT, especially in the dimensions of analysis, inference, and deductive reasoning. According to Fazioni et al., inferential skills enable individuals to conclude from evidence. During the problem solving, students need to obtain logical results from their prior knowledge to offer appropriate diagnosis and intervention.
Although, studies that examine the impact of inter-professional learning based on problem solving on CT and satisfaction of students from learning experience in quantitative terms was not found, the results of qualitative studies on the experience of health-related students from participating in inter-professional or problem-solving programs have had similar results. For example, the development of CT and high satisfaction from learning experience using problem solving have been demonstrated in many studies from both developing and developed countries, including the studies of Al-Kloub et al. in Egypt, Yuan et al. in China, Murphy et al. in Ireland, Chan, Niemer et al., Walshe et al. as well as studies of Frambach et al. and Reeves et al.,,,,,,,
The important point is that, although inter-professional learning based on problem solving has managed to improve the overall ability of students to apply CT, the level of CT of students before and after the intervention in all dimensions was weak. This can be attributed to the short-term inter-professional training in a few limited sessions. Therefore, it is necessary to use this method of learning at the early stage of education, and its long-term effects should be investigated.
This study is novel as it examined midwifery and nursing students' satisfaction and CT following participation in an inter-professional education but it had some limitations. First, the overcrowded schedule of the participants and the availability of the faculty placed restrictions on this study. Moreover, limitations included a small sample size of nursing and midwifery students. Recommendations from this study are to examine inter-professional learning with a larger sample size and for the first semester of clinical course to provide students the opportunity for evaluating their CT in real clinical practice.
| Conclusion|| |
In today's complex health care environments, nurses and midwives should have CT skills to make appropriate clinical judgments and decisions. The results of this study somewhat confirmed the use of inter-professional learning based on problem solving method as one of the methods for improving the CT of nursing and midwifery students. However, implementing 4 inter-professional training sessions only identified the short-term effect of this method. Studies with more training sessions and long–term evaluation are recommended to determine the long-term effects of this method.
We are grateful to the students who participated in this study for their cooperation. The study is funded by Research Deputy of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences with the code of this ethics committee (number 10-3-92).
Financial support and sponsorship
The author received financial support from Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences for this research project.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Fero LJ, O'Donnell JM, Zullo TG, Dabbs AD, Kitutu J, Samosky JT, et al
. Critical thinking skills in nursing students: comparison of simulation-based performance with metrics. J Adv Nurs 2010;66:2182-93.
Carter AG, Creedy DK, Sidebotham M. Critical thinking skills in midwifery practice: Development of a self-assessment tool for students. Midwifery 2017;50:184-92.
Shin H, Ma H, Park J, Ji ES, Kim DH. The effect of simulation courseware on critical thinking in undergraduate nursing students: Multi-site pre-post study. Nurse Educ Today 2015;35:537-42.
Pucer P, Trobec I, Žvanut B. An information communication technology based approach for the acquisition of critical thinking skills. Nurse Educ Today 2014;34:964-70.
Azizi-Fini I, Hajibagheri A, Adib-Hajbaghery M. Critical thinking skills in nursing students: A comparison between freshmen and senior students. Nurs Midwifery Stud 2015;4:e25721.
Mounaghi KH, Jafari H. Is undergraduate midwifery curriculum promoting critical thinking skills in students? Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2013;16:1-0.
Karimi Mounaghi H, Jafari H. Is undergraduate midwifery curriculum promoting critical thinking skills in students? Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2013;16:1-10.
Carter AG, Creedy DK, Sidebotham M. Evaluation of tools used to measure critical thinking development in nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: A systematic review. Nurse Educ Today 2015;35:864-74.
Raymond-Seniuk C, Profetto-McGrath J. Can one learn to think critically? – A philosophical exploration. Open Nurs J 2011;5:45-51.
Olenick M, Allen LR, Smego RA Jr. Interprofessional education: A concept analysis. Adv Med Educ Pract 2010;1:75-84.
Curran VR, Sharpe D, Flynn K, Button P. A longitudinal study of the effect of an interprofessional education curriculum on student satisfaction and attitudes towards interprofessional teamwork and education. J Interprof Care 2010;24:41-52.
Lin YC, Chan TF, Lai CS, Chin CC, Chou FH, Lin HJ. The impact of an interprofessional problem-based learning curriculum of clinical ethics on medical and nursing students' attitudes and ability of interprofessional collaboration: A pilot study. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2013;29:505-11.
Hadjistavropoulos HD, Juckes K, Dirkse D, Cuddington C, Walker K, Bruno P, et al
. Student evaluations of an interprofessional education experience in pain management. J Interprof Care 2015;29:73-5.
Bennett PN, Gum L, Lindeman I, Lawn S, McAllister S, Richards J, et al
. Faculty perceptions of interprofessional education. Nurse Educ Today 2011;31:571-6.
Elisabeth C, Ewa P, Christine WH. The team builder: The role of nurses facilitating interprofessional student teams at a Swedish clinical training ward. Nurse Educ Pract 2011;11:309-13.
Cusack T, O'Donoghue G. The introduction of an interprofessional education module: Students' perceptions. Qual Prim Care 2012;20:231-8.
Lapkin S, Levett-Jones T, Gilligan C. A systematic review of the effectiveness of interprofessional education in health professional programs. Nurse Educ Today 2013;33:90-102.
Guraya SY, Barr H. The effectiveness of interprofessional education in healthcare: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2018;34:160-5.
Vuurberg G, Vos J, Christoph L, de Vos R. The effectiveness of interprofessional classroom-based education in medical curricula: A systematic review. J Interprof Educ Pract 2019;15:157-67.
Sommerfeldt SC, Barton SS, Stayko P, Patterson SK, Pimlott J. Creating interprofessional clinical learning units: Developing an acute-care model. Nurse Educ Pract 2011;11:273-7.
Lewis R. Learning the 'smart' way. Results from a pilot study evaluating an interprofessional acute care study day. Nurse Educ Today 2011;31:88-93.
Khalili H, Zadeh MH. Investigation of reliability, validity and normality Persian version of the California Critical Thinking Skills Test; Form B (CCTST). J Med Educ 2003;3:29-32.
Hajrezayi B, Shahalizade M, Zeynali M, Badali M. Effectiveness of blended learning on critical thinking skills of nursing students. J Nurs Educ 2015;4:49-59.
Hemmati Maslak Pak M, Orujlu S, Khalkhali H. The effect of problem-based learning training on nursing students' critical thinking skills. J Med Educ Dev 2014;9:24-33.
Kohan SH, Mohammad Ali Beigi N, Beigi M, Taebi M. Midwives' experiences of applying critical thinking in high risk situations at labor unit: A qualitative study. Iran J Med Educ 2013;13:341-52.
Choi E, Lindquist R, Song Y. Effects of problem-based learning vs. traditional lecture on Korean nursing students' critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning. Nurse Educ Today 2014;34:52-6.
Kermansaravi F, Navidian A, Kaykhaei A. Critical thinking dispositions among junior, senior and graduate nursing students in Iran. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2013;83:574-9.
Kong LN, Qin B, Zhou YQ, Mou SY, Gao HM. The effectiveness of problem-based learning on development of nursing students' critical thinking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2014;51:458-69.
Murphy S, Hartigan I, Walshe N, Flynn AV, O'Brien S. Merging problem-based learning and simulation as an innovative pedagogy in nurse education. Clin Simul Nurs 2011;7:141-8.
Al-Kloub MI, Salameh TN, Froelicher ES. Nursing students evaluation of problem based learning and the impact of culture on the learning process and outcomes: A pilot project. Nurse Educ Prac 2014;14:142-7.
Yuan HB, Williams BA, Yin L, Liu M, Fang JB, Pang D. Nursing students' views on the effectiveness of problem-based learning. Nurse Educ Today 2011;31:577-81.
Chan ZC. Students' and experts' perspectives on three learning and teaching activities. Nurse Educ Pract 2014;14:449-54.
Niemer L, Pfendt K, Gers M. Problem-based learning in nursing education: A process for scenario development. Nurse Educ 2010;35:69-73.
Walshe N, O'Brien S, Murphy S, Hartigan I. Integrative learning through simulation and problem-based learning. Clin Simul Nurs 2013;9:e47-54.
Frambach JM, Driessen EW, Chan LC, van der Vleuten CP. Rethinking the globalisation of problem-based learning: How culture challenges self-directed learning. Med Educ 2012;46:738-47.
Reeves S, Perrier L, Goldman J, Freeth D, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional education: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;28(3):1-47:CD002213.