Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 
Users Online: 317
Home Print this page Email this page

 



 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
J Edu Health Promot 2017,  6:25

Sexual function and quality of life in diabetic women referring to health care centers in Mashhad


1 Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2 Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran

Date of Web Publication05-May-2017

Correspondence Address:
Azam Parnan
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_33_15

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Context: Quality of life (QOL) is one of the important indexes of health and well-being promotion in the diabetic patients. Based on numerous studies, these patients have a lower QOL, compared to nondiabetic individuals. In addition, a higher prevalence of sexual function disorder has been reported in their population that can have a negative effect on their QOL.
Aims: This study aimed to investigate the association between sexual function and QOL in diabetic women referring to health care centers in Mashhad during 2013–2014.
Settings and Designs: In this correlational study, the association between sexual function and QOL in 90 diabetic women with type two diabetes referring to health care centers in Mashhad during 2013–2014 was investigated.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Data were collected by Rosen female sexual function index and short form-36 questionnaires.
Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed by mean comparison and Spearman correlation coefficient statistical test through SPSS 16.
Results: Subjects' mean sexual function score was 21.7 ± 6.30. Based on the finding, 25.6% of the subjects suffered from sexual function disorder. Subjects' mean score of QOL was 58.75 ± 1616.24. There was a significant association between an overall score of sexual function and its subscales, with their QOL and two dimensions of overall physical and psychological and mental health scores (P < 0.005).
Conclusions: Sexual function is one of the important and associated aspects of QOL in diabetic patients. Designing and evaluation of the interventions with the goal of an improvement in this variable plays a notable role in the promotion of these patients' QOL. However, with regard to limited research in this field, further studies on this association are suggested.

Keywords: Diabetic women, quality of life, sexual function


How to cite this article:
Tafazoli M, Parnan A, Azmoude E. Sexual function and quality of life in diabetic women referring to health care centers in Mashhad. J Edu Health Promot 2017;6:25

How to cite this URL:
Tafazoli M, Parnan A, Azmoude E. Sexual function and quality of life in diabetic women referring to health care centers in Mashhad. J Edu Health Promot [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Oct 19];6:25. Available from: https://www.jehp.net/text.asp?2017/6/1/25/205735


  Introduction Top


Quality of life (QOL) is a multidimensional concept that WHO defines it as individuals' perception of life, values, goals, standards, and personal desires.[1],[2] QOL, in fact, includes the individuals' cognitive, physical, spiritual, emotional, and social domains of an individual's life. With beginning of the 20's century, researchers, despite administration of preventive, and treatment interventions for the disease, realized that QOL can be one of the important factors in the evaluation of social health and hygiene status.[3] QOL is important as, if ignored, it can lead to hopelessness and lack of motivation for any attempt and reduction of social, economic, cultural, and healthy activities. From a deeper aspect, it can affect the socioeconomic development of a country.[4] In recent 20 years, the interest in evaluation and improvement of patients' QOL, especially in chronic patient, has notably increased so that the improvement of their activities of daily living and QOL has turned to a goal. Most of the scholars consider QOL as the most important index in the evaluation of health and treatment care in these patients.[5] In fact, the final goal of modern health cares in diabetic patients is not postponing the death but promotion of their health and QOL.[6] An increased attention, paid to QOL in recent two decades, has led to researchers' field of work toward investigation and detection of its relevant effective factors. It is so that these factors can be modified leading to promotion of QOL, especially in chronic patients. Numerous factors possibly affect individuals' QOL.[7],[8] For instance, in some studies, the association between sexual function and QOL in women at fertility age has been reported. Women's sexual function is a part of their health that it can be impaired by a disorder in sexual desire and arousal, orgasm and dyspareunia that are common disorders all over the world in all cultures and ethnics.[9],[10],[11] Individuals' sexual function and its related domains are affected by various variables, which can be categorized into the three majors groups of biological, psychological, and couples' related factors. Among the suggested biological factors in this context, vascular diseases (cardiovascular disease), neurological factors (head injury, epilepsies), medications (psychotropic drugs, antidepressants, alcohol and drugs), and endocrine causes (diabetes, hormonal changes especially testosterone).[12],[13],[14]

Diabetes as one of the most common chronic diseases in all age and racial groups is among the suggested factors affecting individuals' sexual function.[9],[15] Prevalence of such a disease has an increasing pace due to a change in lifestyle and spread of obesity, so that in 2013, it affected 382 million adults aged 20–70 years. It is estimated that in 2030, this number will reach 439 million.[16],[17] In Iran, its prevalence increased from 7.7% in 2005 to 8.7% in 2007.[15] This disease leaves disabling and life-threatening complications on the vital body organs such as neuropathy, ophthalmological complications, and cardiovascular and renal diseases.[5],[18] Several recent studies investigated the association between diabetes and sexual function in both genders.[9],[19],[20] For instance Shi et al., in a study on sexual function disorder in Chinese women with type two diabetes concluded that diabetic women's sexual function overall score was significantly lower in study group, compared to control group.[19] Meta-analysis results of a study, conducted by Pontiroli et al. on 3168 diabetic women and 2823 subjects in the control group, showed a higher prevalence of sexual function disorder in diabetic women.[21] Sexual function disorder has a sophisticated etiology in diabetic women. Causes such as vascular, neural, hormonal, and psychological changes are the suggested effective factors in this context.[18],[22] Meanwhile, Siddiqu et al., in their literature review study, reported the dominant pathological effect of psychological factors on sexual function disorder in diabetic patients.[18] High prevalence of diabetes and its complications has attracted numerous researchers.[23] In this regard, some of the studies on QOL and diabetic patients' health reported the negative effects of diabetes complications on diabetic patients.[24],[25],[26] For instance, Kiadaliri et al., in a systematic review study on diabetes in Iran, reported that the QOL of diabetic patients was lower than their healthy peers.[15] In fact, diabetes, such as other chronic diseases, can lead to individuals' lowered QOL through causing physical, psychological, and social problems.[27] Generally, most of the studies, separately investigating patients' QOL and their sexual function, reported an inappropriate condition in these two issues although their association is yet under question, and few studies have investigated them. For instance, Soltan Ahmadi et al. reported no significant association between type two diabetic women's QOL and their sexual dysfunction in Kerman, Iran.[7] Meanwhile, the study of Enzlin et al., on type one diabetic women in Belgium, reported a significant association between their sexual function and QOL.[28] Therefore, with regard to limited and controversial existing studies in this context as well as the cultural differences, effective on QOL and sexual function in various countries, the present study aimed to investigate the association between sexual function and QOL in diabetic women referring to health care centers.


  Subjects and Methods Top


This correlational study was conducted on 90 women referring to health care centers in Mashhad, Iran during 2013–2014. The minimum number of sample size was estimated by both formula associated with the corelational studies and a pilot study. Firstly, sexual function and QOL were investigated in 15 subjects, and then, the correlation coefficient between these two variables was calculated by Spearman correlation coefficient test. Correlation coefficient and critical values were used in a formula with a confidence interval of 95% and power of 80%, and the minimum sample size was calculated 79 subjects. With regard to the probable subjects' drop and to increase validity, the sample size was considered with 90 subjects. A selection of health centers was based on cluster sampling so that based on the population, covered by the health centers, and 10 health care centers from five districts of Mashhad were randomly selected. Next, a convenience sample was conducted among the qualified subjects. The subjects were selected from the women with diagnosed diabetes (fasting blood sugar >126 mg/dl and HbA1C >6.5 and sugar 2 h after a meal >180 mg/dl) who referred to the selected health care centers. The subjects meeting inclusion criteria, being explained by the research goal and signing the written consent form, received the research questionnaires to complete. Inclusion criteria were having literacy of reading and writing Persian, age between 18 and 60 years, no addiction to alcohol and drugs among the subjects and their spouses, being married (at least six most after marriage), living with the spouse in the same house, and at least 1-year after development of type two diabetes. The subjects were left out of the study in case of their own or their spouses' involvement in other diagnosed diseases affecting their sexual activity such as cardiovascular and neurological diseases, traumas, and any surgeries on their reproductive system, serious physical defects, taking medications affecting sexual activity, consumption of contraceptives, spouses' treason, or the incidence of severe psychological crisis in the month prior to the study. Data collection tool was personal characteristics and disease related questionnaires female sexual function index and short form-36 (SF-36) QOL questionnaire.

Rosen female sexual function index (2000) contains 19 items with six subscales of sexual desire, sexual arousal, vaginal moisture, orgasm, dyspareunia, and sexual satisfaction, scored between 2 and 36. Higher scores of this scale show better sexual function and less pain.[29]

SF-36 QOL questionnaire includes 36 items in eight domains of physical functioning and role limitation due to physical problems, role limitation due to emotional problem, bodily pain, social functioning, mental health, vitality, and general health, scored between 0 and 100. Higher scores show higher QOL.[30]

The validity of the personal characteristics questionnaire was confirmed by content validity. Persian version of sexual function scale was approved by the study of Mohamadi et al. through content validity test.[31] Persian version of SF-36 QOL questionnaire was confirmed by the Health Sciences Research Center of Kashan Jahad Daneshgahi unit.[32] Reliability of the adopted questionnaires was confirmed after a pilot study, conducted on 20 subjects (Cronbach's alpha = 0.7). Collected data were analyzed by descriptive, independent t-test, Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis, and Spearman correlation coefficient tests through SPSS software 16 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Significance level was considered P< 0.05 (confidence interval of 95%). Power was also considered 80%; therefore the difference less than P< 0.05 was reported significant.


  Results Top


90 type two diabetic women with mean age of 43.58 ± 9.39 years were investigated in the present study. Subjects' age ranged between 19 and 60 years. Their mean body mass index (BMI) was 29.55 ± 7.93 (overweight). Their mean length of marriage was 25.13 ± 10.84 years and mean length of diabetes diagnosis was 5.58 ± 4.14 years [Table 1].
Table 1: Subjects' baseline characteristics

Click here to view


The results showed that subjects' mean score of sexual function was 21.72 ± 6.30 ranging between 31.40 and 2.80. With regard to the cut-off point of 26.55, reported in most of the studies, it is concluded that 74.4% of the subjects suffered from sexual dysfunction.[33] In addition, subjects' mean scores in subscales of sexual desire and sexual arousal were lower than the obtained cut-off point, revealing their disorder in these two domains of sexual function [Table 2].
Table 2: Mean score of sexual function, QOL and its subscales in studied women

Click here to view


Subjects' mean score of QOL was 58.75 ± 16.24, and their mean scores in domains of physical health, and mental health in QOL were 58.85 ± 17.69 and 58.65 ± 17.10 respectively. Among QOL subscales, the lowest score was for general health (46.77 ± 18.98) and the highest for physical functioning (69.39 ± 25.83) [Table 2]. Based on the findings of Kruskal–Wallis and Spearman correlation coefficient tests, there was a significant positive association between subjects' income (0.49), BMI (0.014), and length of disease (0.027), and sexual function. There was a positive and significant association between subjects' QOL and their income (0.003), BMI (0.003) and length of disease (0.001) while there was no significant association between subjects' age, education level, occupation, number of children, length of diabetes, and diabetes control, and variables of QOL and sexual function (P > 0.05).

Spearman correlation test showed a significant association between overall score of sexual function and its subscales, and QOL and its two dimensions (P < 0.05) [Table 3].
Table 3: Correlation of sexual function and its dimension with QOL and subscales of physical and mental health

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Based on the findings, diabetic patients' QOL mean score was less than that of the subjects referring to diabetes clinic in Shahid Bahonar Hospital in Kerman, Iran and was more than that reported by Sadabadi and Babapour Kheirodin [4],[7] in Tabriz, Iran. The difference may be due to different lengths of disease in these two studies, compared to the present study. For instance, in the study of Saltan Ahmadi, subjects' length of diabetes was longer (8.20 ± 6.20 years) than the present study. In addition, the lowest score of QOL in the present study was for subscale of general health and the highest for dimensions of social and physical functions. The results, reported by others studies on diabetic patients, are mostly in line with the present study. For instance, Thommasen et al. reported that the highest effect of diabetes was on reduction of physical functioning and general health role play and the lowest on subjects' social functional.[34] In study of Sadabadi and Babapour Kheirodin, the highest effect of diabetes was reported on role limitation due to physical problems and role limitation due to emotional problem and the lowest (consistent with the present study) on patients' social functioning.[4] In fact, diabetes can negatively affect physical function, development of the complications, mental and psychological conditions, and personal, familial and social communications leading to individuals' lowered QOL.[35] Mayou et al. also showed that diabetic patients experience more reduction or absence of freshness and vitality, as well as fatigue, depression, irritability, tension, and stress that can lead to their lowered general health.[36] Lindqvist and Sjödén, inconsistent with the present study, showed that the patients with peritoneal dialysis have lower scores in physical functioning domain and role limitation due to physical problems of QOL,[37] possibly due to different natures of these two diseases.

In addition, present study reported the prevalence of sexual function as 74.4% among the diabetic patients, which is less than that reported by Ziaei-Rad et al. among the diabetic women in Isfahan.[38] The possible cause can be different sample sizes and the investigated type of diabetes (both types of diabetes were studied). According to several studies, prevalence of sexual dysfunction is higher in type one diabetic women, compared to type two, and 91% of the subjects in study of Ziaei-Rad et al. suffered from type one diabetes.[39] Enzlin et al., reported the prevalence of diabetic women's sexual dysfunction as 27%,[40] possibly due to different sample sizes and a higher number of type one diabetes. In Enzlin study, the sample size was calculated with the goal of the investigation of diabetic patients' sexual dysfunction prevalence. Based on our obtained results, the highest sexual dysfunction was observed in dimensions of sexual desire and sexual arousal respectively. In another literature review study, it was reported that the most frequent sexual dysfunction in diabetic patients was for sexual desire and lubrication, but its effect on orgasm has been less showed.[18],[41]

In addition, statistical tests showed a positive significant association between sexual function and it's all subscales, and QOL. In other words, an increase in sexual function score leads to the improvement of QOL. Sexual relationship often acts as a catalyzer between the couple to cause and preserve a friendly relationship and its dysfunction may affect individuals' lifestyle leading to a marital relationship disorder, lower patients' self-confidence, and generally, influences individuals' QOL;[23] therefore, paying close attention to diabetic women's sexual function can play a pivotal role in diabetic patients' QOL. Inconsistent with these results, Soltan Ahmadi et al. reported no significant association between diabetic women's sexual function and their QOL in Kerman.[7] Moore et al. also reported no significant association between obese patients' overall score of sexual function and their QOL.[42] On the contrary, Noosh-Abadi et al. (2014) reported a significant association between the sexual function of women with irritable bowel syndrome and their QOL in Tehran.[23] Research on women with multiple sclerosis also shows an association between a reduction of sexual function and their all dimensions of QOL.[43],[44] These studies prove the effect of sexual function on QOL of the patients with chronic and specific diseases. Based on our findings, among the baseline variables, the level of income, BMI, and length of disease are the only variables associated with a sexual function and QOL. Some other studies showed a defect in QOL, resulted from a higher BMI. For instance, Monjamed et al. showed a significant association between diabetic patients' BMI and QOL, but inconsistent with the present study, they reported a significant association between subjects' age and education, and QOL.[45] Ahmadi et al., in a study in Charmahal and Bakhtiari province in Iran, reported no significant association between diabetic women's age and BMI, and their QOL.[5] Abu Ali et al. showed a negative effect of subjects' age, BMI, and length of diabetes on women's sexual function in Jordan.[46] Inconsistent with the present study, Ziaei-Rad et al. reported no significant association between length of disease and sexual function.[38] In line with the present study, Fatemi and Taghavi reported a significant association between length of diabetes and severity of sexual dysfunction in 50 type two diabetic women in Mashhad [47] (in a similar study population). There was no significant association observed between education, and QOL and sexual function in the present study. Fatemi and Taghavi also reported no significant association,[47] but Saadatjoo et al. reported that diabetic individuals with education level of high school diploma and associate degree significantly had a better QOL, compared to other education levels.[48] On the contrary, Darvishpoor et al. reported lowered QOL among the subjects with a bachelor's degree and over, compared with high school diploma and an associate degree.[2] In addition, contrary to our obtained results, Ghasemi-Pour et al. reported a significant difference in QOL scores between type one and type two diabetic subjects with different occupational status.[49] The association between occupational status and sexual function was not significant in the present study, which is consistent with Fatemi and Taghavi.[47] The association between disease condition and variables of sexual function and QOL was not significant in the present study, which is in line with Fatemi's study, conducted in a similar study population.[47] Maiorino et al., in a literature review, reported no clear role of hyperglycemia as the main determinant for diabetes vascular complications in the pathophysiology of the cardiovascular disorder.[9] Despite the observed association between sexual function and QOL in diabetic women in the present study, this study had its own limitations including women's reluctance to complete sexual function questionnaire, and consequently, their probable distrustful responses to the questions. Meanwhile, the researchers tried to do her best to diminish their distrust through assuring them about anonymity and confidentiality of their data and overall analysis of the questionnaires. In addition, the questionnaires were completed in a private room by the subjects with no direct observation of the researcher.


  Conclusion Top


Generally, based on obtained results, sexual function is among the important and relevant aspects of QOL in diabetic patients.

Detection and evaluation of sexual function can be effective on helping diabetic patients. In fact, this finding can be an efficient step toward management and designing of effective interventions to improve diabetic patients' QOL. Efficient psychotherapy to modify their sexual problems may also promote their QOL. Despite our obtained results, with regard to existing controversy in various studies, furthers studies to precisely investigate such associations and to conduct relevant interventions to detect other factors effective on diabetic patients' QOL are suggested.

Acknowledgments

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and the Research Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (code: 920970). The researchers would like to express their gratitude to all the participants who were involved in this study and staff of Mashhad Health Centers.

Financial support and sponsorship

Research Vice Chancellor of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Rummans TA, Clark MM, Sloan JA, Frost MH, Bostwick JM, Atherton PJ, et al. Impacting quality of life for patients with advanced cancer with a structured multidisciplinary intervention: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:635-42.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Darvishpoor Kakhki A, Abed Saeedi Z, Yaghmaie F, Alavi Majd H, Montazeri A. Survey correlation between quality of life and disease and demographic variables of diabetic patients referred to Tehran hospitals in 2004. Iran J Endocrinol Metab 2006;8:49-56.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Darban F. The Effect of Stress Inoculation Program on the Quality of Life of Nurses Working in Psychiatric Wards: Mashhad University Of Medical Science; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Sadabadi MH, Babapour Kheirodin J. Comparison of quality of life and coping strategies in diabetic and nondiabetic people. J Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci 2012;20:581-92.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ahmadi A, Zade JH, Madise MR, Lashkari L. Effective factors in the quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes. J North Khorasan Univ Med Sci 2011;3:7-13.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Lam CL, Lauder IJ. The impact of chronic diseases on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of Chinese patients in primary care. Fam Pract 2000;17:159-66.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Soltan Ahmadi ZH, Ranjbar H, Kohan M. The relationship between sexual function of diabetic women with quality of life. J Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci 2013;23:32-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Hisasue S, Kumamoto Y, Sato Y, Masumori N, Horita H, Kato R, et al. Prevalence of female sexual dysfunction symptoms and its relationship to quality of life: A Japanese female cohort study. Urology 2005;65:143-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Maiorino MI, Bellastella G, Esposito K. Diabetes and sexual dysfunction: Current perspectives. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2014;7:95-105.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Ramezani M, Dolatian M, Shams J, Alavi H. The relationship between self-esteem and sexual dysfunction and satisfaction in women. Arak Med Univ J 2012;14:57-65.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Zeighami Mohammadi SH, Ghaffar F. Sexual dysfunction and its correlation with quality of life among women affected with cancer. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2009;12:39-46.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Veronelli A, Mauri C, Zecchini B, Peca MG, Turri O, Valitutti MT, et al. Sexual dysfunction is frequent in premenopausal women with diabetes, obesity, and hypothyroidism, and correlates with markers of increased cardiovascular risk. A preliminary report. J Sex Med 2009;6:1561-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Lowenstein L, Pierce K, Pauls R. Urogynecology and sexual function research. How are we doing? J Sex Med 2009;6:199-204.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Raina R, Pahlajani G, Khan S, Gupta S, Agarwal A, Zippe CD. Female sexual dysfunction: Classification, pathophysiology, and management. Fertil Steril 2007;88:1273-84.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kiadaliri AA, Najafi B, Mirmalek-Sani M. Quality of life in people with diabetes: A systematic review of studies in Iran. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2013;12:54.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Diabetes Atlas 2012: 371 Million Cases Worldwide; 2015 Available from: HYPERLINK “http://www.jnj.com/sites/default/files/pdf/Facts-About-Diabetes-Infographic.pdfhttp://www.jnj.com/sites/default/files/pdf/Facts-About-Diabetes-Infographic.pdf. [Last updated on 2015 May 12; Last cited on 2015 May 14].  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010;87:4-14.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Siddiqu MA, Ahmed Z, Ahmed-Khan A. Psychological impact on sexual health among diabetic patients: A review. Int J Diabetes Res 2012;1:28-31.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Shi YF, Shao XY, Lou QQ, Chen YJ, Zhou HJ, Zou JY. Study on female sexual dysfunction in type 2 diabetic Chinese women. Biomed Environ Sci 2012;25:557-61.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Enzlin P, Rosen R, Wiegel M, Brown J, Wessells H, Gatcomb P, et al. Sexual dysfunction in women with type 1 diabetes: Long-term findings from the DCCT/EDIC study cohort. Diabetes Care 2009;32:780-5.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Pontiroli AE, Cortelazzi D, Morabito A. Female sexual dysfunction and diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sex Med 2013;10:1044-51.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Walsh KE, Berman JR. Sexual dysfunction in the older woman: An overview of the current understanding and management. Drugs Aging 2004;21:655-75.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Noosh-Abadi AN, Rezaei O, Ebrahimi-Daryani N. The relationship between sexual function and quality of life in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Govaresh 2014;18:216-23.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Wexler DJ, Grant RW, Wittenberg E, Bosch JL, Cagliero E, Delahanty L, et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2006;49:1489-97.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Lloyd A, Sawyer W, Hopkinson P. Impact of long-term complications on quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes not using insulin. Value Health 2001;4:392-400.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Rubin RR, Peyrot M. Quality of life and diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 1999;15:205-18.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Yekta Z, Pourali R, Ghasemi-Rad M. Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics influencing health-related quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulcers and those without foot ulcers. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2011;4:393-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Enzlin P, Mathieu C, Van den Bruel A, Bosteels J, Vanderschueren D, Demyttenaere K. Sexual dysfunction in women with type 1 diabetes: A controlled study. Diabetes Care 2002;25:672-7.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000;26:191-208.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Mohamadi KH, Heidari M, Faghihzadeh S. Validity of Persian Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Payesh J Iran Inst Health Sci Res 2008;2:269-78.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res 2005;14:875-82.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): Cross-validation and development of clinical cut off scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005;31 (1):1-20.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Thommasen HV, Berkowitz J, Thommasen AT, Michalos AC. Understanding relationships between diabetes mellitus and health-related quality of life in a rural community. Rural Remote Health 2005;5:441.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Lustman PJ, Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, de Groot M, Carney RM, Clouse RE. Depression and poor glycemic control: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Diabetes Care 2000;23:934-42.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Mayou R, Bryant B, Turner R. Quality of life in non-insulin-dependent diabetes and a comparison with insulin-dependent diabetes. J Psychosom Res 1990;34:1-11.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Lindqvist R, Sjödén PO. Coping strategies and quality of life among patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). J Adv Nurs 1998;27:312-9.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Ziaei-Rad M, Vahdaninia M, Montazeri A. Sexual dysfunctions in patients with diabetes: A study from Iran. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2010;8:50.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Wallner LP, Sarma AV, Kim C. Sexual functioning among women with and without diabetes in the Boston Area Community Health Study. J Sex Med 2010;7 (2 Pt 2):881-7.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Enzlin P, Mathieu C, Van Den Bruel A, Vanderschueren D, Demyttenaere K. Prevalence and predictors of sexual dysfunction in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003;26:409-14.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Bitzer J, Alder J. Diabetes and female sexual health. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 2009;5:629-36.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Moore RH, Sarwer DB, Lavenberg JA, Lane IB, Evans JL, Volger S, et al. Relationship between sexual function and quality of life in obese persons seeking weight reduction. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013;21:1966-74.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Merghati Khoei E, Qaderi K, Amini L, Haghani H. Relationship between sexual function and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. IJOGI 2012;15:7-14.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Tepavcevic DK, Kostic J, Basuroski ID, Stojsavljevic N, Pekmezovic T, Drulovic J. The impact of sexual dysfunction on the quality of life measured by MSQoL-54 in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2008;14:1131-6.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Monjamed Z, Asqharpoor MA, Mehran A, Peimani T. The quality of life in diabetic patients with chronic complications. Hayat 2006;12:55-66.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Abu Ali RM, Al Hajeri RM, Khader YS, Shegem NS, Ajlouni KM. Sexual dysfunction in Jordanian diabetic women. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1580-1.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Fatemi SS, Taghavi SM. Evaluation of sexual function in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2009;6:38-9.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Saadatjoo SA, Rezvanee MR, Tabyee SH, Oudi D. Life quality comparison in type 2 diabetic patients and none diabetic persons. Mod Care 2012;9:24-31.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Ghasemi-Pour M, Ghasemi V, Zamani A. Study of life quality in the patients with diabetes referred to Khorramabad Shohada hospital in 2008. Yafteh 2009;11:125-33.  Back to cited text no. 49
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Risk factors for sexual dysfunction in Romanian women with type 1 diabetes mellitus and chronic autoimmune thyroiditis: a comparative cross-sectional study
Adriana Gherbon,Mirela Frandes,Deiana Roman,Diana Anastasiu-Popov,Romulus Timar
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome. 2020; 12(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 High Prevalence of Erectile Dysfunction in Diabetic Men With Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis
Xu Wang,Xiaohua Yang,Yihong Cai,Shengmei Wang,Weiqun Weng
The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2018; 15(7): 935
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Cardiometabolic Risk and Female Sexuality—Part I. Risk Factors and Potential Pathophysiological Underpinnings for Female Vasculogenic Sexual Dysfunction Syndromes
Elisa Maseroli,Irene Scavello,Linda Vignozzi
Sexual Medicine Reviews. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1205    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded142    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal