Journal of Education and Health Promotion

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2019  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 64-

Peer-assisted teaching method to foster learning physiological basis of electrocardiography among 1st year medical graduate students: An interventional study


Prathamesh Haridas Kamble1, Anupam Suhas Khare2, Shital Sopanrao Maske3, Gaurav Sharma1, Arun Narayan Kowale2,  
1 Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2 Department of Physiology, BJGMC, Pune, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Anatomy, Dr. S.N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Prathamesh Haridas Kamble
Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan
India

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In peer-assisted teaching (PAT) method, students are encouraged to prepare, organize, and construct their learning program under the guidance of a teacher. The objective of the present study is to assess the benefits and outcome of PAT on students' understanding and knowledge of one of the important and difficult topics, “physiological basis of electrocardiography (ECG).” METHODS: A nonrandomized, interventional study was carried out in the department of physiology. Five peer tutors were selected and trained in the basics of ECG by a senior faculty of physiology for 12–14 h sessions over the 6-week period. These peer tutors then conducted a day-long workshop on five different subtopics of ECG, which was attended by 184 1st year medical students. Evaluation of the workshop was done through pre/posttest 20-item questionnaire score analysis and feedback questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale items. RESULTS: The average pre- and posttest scores were 6.6 ± 2.73 and 13.3 ± 4.73, respectively. The average posttest scores were higher and statistically significant compared to pretest (R2 = 0.4275; P < 0.05). The class average normalized gain (g) for a posttest score was 101.5%. Of 184 students, 9.7% of students had >70% improvement from the pretest score, and 44.78% had more than 50% improvement in their posttest scores. CONCLUSION: We received a predominantly positive feedback for the usefulness of peer teaching as a learning method. Thus, PAT was found to be a feasible and effective way of teaching the difficult concepts in physiology.



How to cite this article:
Kamble PH, Khare AS, Maske SS, Sharma G, Kowale AN. Peer-assisted teaching method to foster learning physiological basis of electrocardiography among 1st year medical graduate students: An interventional study.J Edu Health Promot 2019;8:64-64


How to cite this URL:
Kamble PH, Khare AS, Maske SS, Sharma G, Kowale AN. Peer-assisted teaching method to foster learning physiological basis of electrocardiography among 1st year medical graduate students: An interventional study. J Edu Health Promot [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 20 ];8:64-64
Available from: http://www.jehp.net/text.asp?2019/8/1/64/254057


Full Text

 Introduction



Peer-assisted teaching (PAT) can be described as the process of instructing and helping fellow students to gain knowledge, understanding, or skills in a way that is beneficial to both the peer tutors and the students. It is an efficacious method to encourage learning. PAT provides a structured and flexible approach to teaching practice in a sympathetic and friendly environment.[1],[2] PAT has shown better utilization of existing resources and has proved more beneficial for students than traditional teching methods.[3] In this method, students are encouraged to prepare, organize, and construct their own learning program under the guidance of a teacher/faculty. Then, few students (peer tutors) explain the same topic to the fellow learners.[4] Peer teaching helps students to increase their confidence, oral presentation skills, communication skills, and teaching skills. Basic teaching methodology has been barely reformed in India. This has resulted in lesser quality of doctors produced than in developed countries such as UK, USA, and Germany.[5] PAT is useful in the Indian setting of medical education because there is very low teacher–student ratio, and PAT allows to overcome low teacher–student ratio as students become teacher for their peers. Implementation of modern techniques in medical education requires expensive infrastructure, and with limited availability of resources in India, PAT is the cost-effective and much-needed medical education reform in India. It is an active learning process which increases the collaboration among peers. As the peer tutors and students share a similar knowledge base and use the same language, students do not hesitate to ask questions.

Although it has existed for many years and is highly valued as a resource for teaching, it has not been utilized much. We found that electrocardiography (ECG) is one of the most challenging topics in medicine and students often have difficulty in understanding the basic physiological concepts associated with it. We usually discuss ECG in a didactic lecture and then a small group discussion with teachers. Small group discussion exercise simplifies the learning of ECG, but still, there is a communication gap between student and teacher. Hence, we thought that probably PAT method would be the best method for learning ECG. Hence, we planned and started our study with the following objectives.

Objectives

The aims of our study were to investigate: (i) the practicality of using a PAT method for ECG learning of 1st year medical graduate students; (ii) the acceptability and usefulness of PAT among 1st year medical graduate students; (iii) the benefits experienced by peer tutors; and (iv) feedback from the 1st year medical students about PAT.

 Methods



An interventional study was conducted in the Department of Physiology, BJGMC, Pune, from November 2016 to January 2017. The peer tutors were selected among 1st year medical graduate students admitted in the academic year 2016–2017. The criteria for selection of peer tutors were voluntary participation, formal interview, and auditioning of all the volunteers by faculty members of physiology department. Fifteen students volunteered to participate in the peer teaching; however, only six students were selected for training; of which, five students participated as peer tutors and one coordinated the program.

Inclusion criteria

All 1st year medical graduate students (n = 200) admitted in 1st year MBBS in B. J. Medical College included in the study as learners. They were informed that they will be trained by peers under supervision of the faculty from the department of physiology.

Exclusion

Peer tutors (n = 5), coordinator (n = 1), and 10 students not present on the day of teaching were not included in the learner's group.

Training of peer tutors

Peer tutors (n = 6) were selected and received 6 weeks of training sessions from the senior faculty of department of physiology on the principles, concepts, and theories of basic ECG and regarding skills related to teaching. Then, peer tutors set the objectives of the teaching sessions and practiced how to teach and assess the students formatively. They divided the topic of the ECG into five subtopics: basic electrophysiology, basic ECG waves, genesis of ECG, ECG axis determination, and abnormal ECG. Then, they prepared their handouts and PowerPoint presentations for their teaching sessions.

Of 200 1st year medical graduate students, 184 students attended the PAT program. All the students were taught ECG in didactics lectures and in small groups before PAT sessions. Before the teaching session, all the students were given the pretest questionnaire related to the concepts in basic ECG. Then, the 3-h session, which consisted of five lectures presented by peer tutors, was carried out. The senior and junior faculties of the department of physiology were present during the sessions to take care of administrative problems and to observe teaching–learning experience. The teaching was conducted using the blackboard, PowerPoint presentations, and the handout booklet provided to the students. At the end of the teaching session, posttest questionnaire and the 5-point Likert scale questionnaire scale (from strongly disagree = 1 to strongly agree = 5) was given to all the students. Furthermore, a separate 5-point Likert scale questionnaire was given to the peer tutors to assess their peer teaching experience. Pre- and posttest questionnaire consisted of 20 questions of various formats such as multiple-choice questions, true or false, calculations of heart rate, axis determination, and identifying the ECG waves and its abnormalities. Different sets of questions were used in pre and posttest questionnaires, but of the same difficulty level. The questionnaire was tested and validated by ten senior teaching faculties of the department of physiology and ten students of second professional MBBS of B. J. Medical College.

Data analysis

Online Software GraphPad Prism version 7.1 was used to analyze the data. All values of pre- and posttest results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Then, the statistical difference was calculated using paired t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The scores of 5-point Likert scale were calculated and expressed as percentages to indicate agreement or disagreement of tutors and tutees with regard to the statements in the questionnaires.

 Results



Of the total 200 students of 1st MBBS, 184 (92%) attended the PAT program and responded to the pretest, posttest, and questionnaire of the student's perceptions. Ten (5%) students were absent. All six peer tutors who participated in the study responded to the postintervention questionnaire. The peer teaching program was successfully implemented, all five scheduled sessions on ECG were conducted, and fellow tutors, fellow learners, and faculty members were very enthusiastic.

The average pretest score was 6.6 ± 2.73, and the posttest score was 13.3 ± 4.73. The difference between the two was statistically significant P < 0.05 [Table 1].{Table 1}

The overall percentage improvement in the score after the PAT program was 101.5%. Of 184 participants, 18 (9.7%) had more than 70% improvement in their posttest score as compared to pretest score. However, 64/184 (34.78%) students had 50%–70% improvement and 101/184 students (54.89%) had 10%–50% improvement in their posttest scores. Only one student had deteriorated in the posttest score after attending the peer teaching activity [Table 2].{Table 2}

Peer learners who participated in the program accepted the usefulness and benefits of peer teaching [Table 3] and [Figure 1], [Figure 2].{Table 3}{Figure 1}{Figure 2}

Out of those who think that such activities should be conducted in the future, the average frequency of such activities should be 12 activities per year, depending on the difficulty level and its applicability to clinical scenarios.

To an open-ended question “Any suggestions for the future betterment of such activities?” following were the responses as shown in [Table 4].{Table 4}

In the present study, we have also assessed the response of peer tutor's response regarding PAT experience as shown in [Table 5].{Table 5}

 Discussion



An interventional study was conducted with an objective to study (i) the practicality of using a peer teaching method for ECG learning by 1st year medical graduate students; (ii) the acceptability and usefulness of 1st year medical graduate students toward peer learning; (iii) the benefits experienced by peer tutors; and (iv) feedback from the 1st year medical students about PAT.

Our study demonstrated that a peer-teaching method was practicable and acceptable to learners, if it is well organized and the peer tutors are properly trained under supervision. Weyrich et al. in 2008[6] demonstrated similar findings in undergraduate technical skills training using the peer teaching method giving more emphasis on the process of training the peer tutors and supervision. Our selected peer tutors were all well trained for a period of 6 weeks before commencement of teaching. They all were briefed about the teaching skills and the ECG topic. In the last decade, few studies have demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of PAT in medical education.[1],[2],[7],[8],[9] In PAT peer tutor and peer learner have the same background understanding and knowledge of subject thus allows better understanding by peer learners as compared to the same topic taught by senior faculties of the department. Our results add further proof of its suitability as a medical undergraduate teaching especially for important and difficult topics such as ECG.

The results of feedback from the students demonstrated that 1st year medical students favorably received peer teaching. Peer teaching program helped them understand difficult concepts better, gain new knowledge, and acquire skills of interpreting ECG.

The peer teaching program was effective probably because the communication was better between learners and peer tutors, as they shared similar previous knowledge, almost similar cognitive domains and social resemblance.[4],[10] The results of our study are in agreement with those of previous studies documenting the benefits of peer teaching in medical education.[7],[9],[10],[11] In the similar study, Williams et al.[12] reported the benefits of PAT and confidence in peer tutors and peers learners. They also proposed the importance of PAT in medical education. Peer learners agreed on the importance of continuation of this program, and some of the participants requested to increase the frequency of such activities and the inclusion of this model as a formal method in the curriculum. PAT would be a better method of teaching, especially in a scenario where there is an increased number of medical students and limited time availability among clinical teaching staff.[3],[8] On the other hand, two big systemic reviews done by Sevenhuysen et al.[13] and Tai et al.[14] have not reported high confidence on PAT system. They have suggested more interventional studies to gain confidence in the new PAT system. They reported that many studies have not described the methodology of PAT and have suggested a detailed description of the study design in future studies.

The participating students commented that there were a limited number of peer tutors for the relatively large number of learners. However, this issue can be solved by allocating 5–6 learners per tutor.

Peer tutors benefited by improving their knowledge and acquiring the skill of teaching, without affecting their own learning programs as 1st year medical students. Similar findings were depicted by Ten Cate and Durning 2007[15] and Nestel and Kidd 2005.[16] One student who scores lower in posttest questionnaire than pretest questionnaire was interviewed to enquire the reason for decline in the score. He was asked the difficulty he had in following and understanding the concepts. The student confessed that he did not pay attention to the teaching and was occupied in his smartphone. He liked the PAT methodology, but was inattentive during the teaching sessions.

Effective implementation of PAT in the present study does not rule out the role of trained teachers in the teaching of medical graduates. They also have an important role in training and guiding peer tutors, keep a close eye on their performance and giving them suggestions for better improvement. PAT is a new study methodology, which can be implicated in modern medical education system. The PAT does not put any financial burden on the existing system, but combats various problems of our education system such as low teacher–student ratio, better understanding of knowledge gap between educator and learner, infusion of confidence in peer tutors to perform in public, and more friendly relationship between educator and learner. Introduction of new PAT system into modern medical education curriculum will help us build better future doctors. PAT will help build our academic medical curriculum for better understanding and benefit of our future doctors. Introduction of PAT to medical curriculum has the advantages of minimal burden on limited financial resources, friendly classroom environment, and making of future doctors who are confident in public speaking. This PAT has few disadvantages as well, such as limited knowledge delivery by experienced and learned faculty members, less of faculty–student interaction, and different levels of teaching skills of peer tutors leads to uneven delivery of knowledge to different groups of peer learners. PAT also makes the teaching and knowledge delivery to students slow as compared to normal traditional lecture teaching. PAT can be implicated as a teaching tool for difficult topic in medical curriculum but not for full course.

Limitations of the study

To increase the benefits of our peer-teaching experience, the number of skills and tutors should be increasedThe learner's group should be smallerTo check whether learners retained the knowledge and skills of ECG acquired, there should be a follow-up evaluation of the students' performance after a few monthsRandomization of learners is an important issueInclusion of controls for comparison is also difficultStudents taught by PAT should be compared to the other student taught by standard teaching methods, but ethically comparison group cannot be denied to newer teaching in medical college. Comparison to MBBS 2nd year batch was not done as they studied the same topic almost a year back and most did not retain the details of topic taught in MBBS 1st year.

 Conclusion



Our study demonstrated that a PAT program for teaching basic concepts and skills of ECG to 1st year medical graduates can be an effective tool for teaching. The results of our study suggested that PAT can be useful for teaching difficult concepts and skills. This method is incorporated into the curriculum to improve knowledge, skills, and attitude of students.

Acknowledgment

I would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to all the participants in the study, that is, 1st year medical graduate students for their active and enthusiastic participation in this study. Second, I would also like to thank all the junior residents and nonteaching staff of the Department of Physiology, B. J. Government Medical College, Pune, for their constant support.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Escovitz ES. Using senior students as clinical skills teaching assistants. Acad Med 1990;65:733-4.
2Henning JM, Weidner TG, Marty MC. Peer assisted learning in clinical education: Literature review. Athl Train Educ J 2008;3:84-90.
3Schuetz E, Obirei B, Salat D, Scholz J, Hann D, Dethleffsen K, et al. A large-scale peer teaching programme – Acceptance and benefit. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2017;125:71-9.
4Leeper H, Chang E, Cotter G, MacIntosh P, Scott F, Apantaku L, et al. A student-designed and student-led sexual-history-taking module for second-year medical students. Teach Learn Med 2007;19:293-301.
5Basheer A. Impact of assessment of medical students in India on assuring quality primary care. Australas Med J 2015;8:67-9.
6Weyrich P, Schrauth M, Kraus B, Habermehl D, Netzhammer N, Zipfel S, et al. Undergraduate technical skills training guided by student tutors – Analysis of tutors' attitudes, tutees' acceptance and learning progress in an innovative teaching model. BMC Med Educ 2008;8:18.
7Rodrigues J, Sengupta A, Mitchell A, Kane C, Kane C, Maxwell S, et al. The Southeast Scotland foundation doctor teaching programme – Is “near-peer” teaching feasible, efficacious and sustainable on a regional scale? Med Teach 2009;31:e51-7.
8Weyrich P, Celebi N, Schrauth M, Möltner A, Lammerding-Köppel M, Nikendei C, et al. Peer-assisted versus faculty staff-led skills laboratory training: A randomised controlled trial. Med Educ 2009;43:113-20.
9Wong JG, Waldrep TD, Smith TG. Formal peer-teaching in medical school improves academic performance: The MUSC supplemental instructor program. Teach Learn Med 2007;19:216-20.
10Lockspeiser TM, O'Sullivan P, Teherani A, Muller J. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: The value of social and cognitive congruence. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008;13:361-72.
11Glynn LG, MacFarlane A, Kelly M, Cantillon P, Murphy AW. Helping each other to learn – A process evaluation of peer assisted learning. BMC Med Educ 2006;6:18.
12Williams B, Olaussen A, Peterson EL. Peer-assisted teaching: An interventional study. Nurse Educ Pract 2015;15:293-8.
13Sevenhuysen S, Thorpe J, Molloy E, Keating J, Haines T. Peer-assisted learning in education of allied health professional students in the clinical setting: A systematic review. J Allied Health 2017;46:26-35.
14Tai J, Molloy E, Haines T, Canny B. Same-level peer-assisted learning in medical clinical placements: A narrative systematic review. Med Educ 2016;50:469-84.
15Ten Cate O, Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: Twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach 2007;29:591-9.
16Nestel D, Kidd J. Peer assisted learning in patient-centred interviewing: The impact on student tutors. Med Teach 2005;27:439-44.