Journal of Education and Health Promotion

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2019  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 202-

Comparative study of virtual and traditional teaching methods on the interpretation of cardiac dysrhythmia in nursing students


Hosein Habibzadeh1, Alireza Rahmani1, Bahlol Rahimi2, Soheila Ahangarzadeh Rezai1, Nader Aghakhani1, Fariba Hosseinzadegan1,  
1 Department of Nursing, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
2 Department of Health Information Technology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Fariba Hosseinzadegan
Department of Nursing, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia
Iran

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Due to the importance of correct interpretation of electrocardiogram (ECG) in the quality of healthcare delivery, new educational methods are increasingly being implemented and evaluated. In this regard, the purpose of this study was to compare the traditional and virtual teaching methods on the interpretation of cardiac dysrhythmia in nursing students. METHODS: The present study is a quasi-experimental research with pretest and posttest design. Sixty nursing students in the seventh semester from schools of nursing in Urmia and Khoy cities were randomly assigned to two virtual and traditional education groups. Students' knowledge was measured by a researcher-made 30-item test. RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation of the students' scores in the traditional education group was 11.20 ± 4.41 and 14.40 ± 4.62 and in the virtual group was 11.30 ± 2.74 and 18.43 ± 4.68, pre- and post-training, respectively. Paired t-test showed a significant difference between the mean score of pretest and posttest in both types of training (P < 0.001). According to the results of independent sample t-test, there were no significant differences between the two groups before the training (P > 0.05). However, in the posttraining period, there were significant differences between traditional and virtual education groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Considering the results of this study, which shows the positive effects of virtual education method on nursing students' knowledge about cardiac dysrhythmia, this method can be used as an alternative or complementary method to the traditional education.



How to cite this article:
Habibzadeh H, Rahmani A, Rahimi B, Rezai SA, Aghakhani N, Hosseinzadegan F. Comparative study of virtual and traditional teaching methods on the interpretation of cardiac dysrhythmia in nursing students.J Edu Health Promot 2019;8:202-202


How to cite this URL:
Habibzadeh H, Rahmani A, Rahimi B, Rezai SA, Aghakhani N, Hosseinzadegan F. Comparative study of virtual and traditional teaching methods on the interpretation of cardiac dysrhythmia in nursing students. J Edu Health Promot [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 7 ];8:202-202
Available from: http://www.jehp.net/text.asp?2019/8/1/202/269781


Full Text

 Introduction



Electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the most useful medical examinations whose aim is to diagnose and evaluate heart disorders by waveform recording through electrical potential changes between the two points generated during the electrical activity of the heart. The ECG is a low-cost, easy, fast, and safe examination that provides valuable information for healthcare professionals and thus is an important diagnostic tool for patient's health.[1]ECG interpretation is an important clinical skill that helps for quick diagnosis of life-threatening disorders.[2] However, incorrect interpretation of an ECG can lead to inappropriate clinical decisions with serious adverse outcomes, especially in arrhythmias and myocardial infarction.[3] ECG interpretation is a complex task that is performed by many health professionals, including doctors of all specialties, nurses, physiologists, and paramedics.[4] Considering that nurses are among the first people who can play a key role in identifying cardiac rhythm disorders, so correct reading of the ECG is considered as one of the important duties and competences of nurses.[5] A nurse is responsible for both technical aspects of monitoring (such as electrode placement, alarm parameter setting) and clinical decision-making based on the information obtained from the monitor. Nurses should have enough knowledge to carry out these responsibilities so that they can maximize the quality of care and patient outcomes.[6] Nurses should be able to quickly and correctly detect and interpret ECG abnormalities and intervene in a timely manner.[7]

ECG monitoring and interpretation skills are gained through medical education and enhanced by experience.[8] It is clear that the analysis and interpretation of the ECG are difficult and require significant training.[3] The teaching of interpretation of the ECG is an essential part of medical education.[9] There are no established standard methods for teaching ECG interpretation or presenting ECG findings that are evidence based. In fact, review of the literature shows that the time allocation, faculty training, and teaching methods for ECG interpretation are significantly different.[10] Conventionally, to teach this topic, lecture method that is an expert-centered approach is used.[9] The lecture method, given the possibility of training a large number of learners at once, is an effective and cost-efficient method. On the other hand, this method facilitates passive learning because students have little opportunity for interactive discussion with a lecturer.[11],[12],[13]

Interpretation of the ECG can also be acquired by self-directed learning (SDL), which includes independent study of textbooks and other study materials.[14] Computer-assisted instruction (CAI) has been used as a method for ECG teaching since the 1960s.[15] Computer-assisted learning involves any teaching method that uses a digital platform as an SDL technique that includes both online and offline learning opportunities.[16] Although CAI is a broad term that includes both online and offline modalities, in newer terminology, specifically referring to online learning methods includes terms such as “web-based learning,” “web-based training,” and “e-learning.”[17],[18],[19],[20] According to Alavi and Leidner, e-learning is the virtual learning field in which the interaction among the learner, teachers, and classmates and educational equipment are all different from the traditional method because in virtual environments electronic technology tools are used as an instrument for supporting and improving the learning process.[21]

CAI or web-based learning typically provides the learner with text, images, and other multimedia materials to study. Other educational features, such as practice and test fields (for example, online multiple-choice questions with quick feedback), can be provided by the digital platform.[16],[22],[23] The advantages of multimedia education are flexible classroom time, increased student's autonomy, freedom to do more in-depth training, and less time for the course preparation. The high cost, the need for technical specialists in electronic media, and the lack of social interactions among learners are cited by the disadvantages of this method.[24] The development of multimedia technology and audiovisual systems results in learners' freedom from the time and place restrictions of traditional learning. Learners experience more flexibility in learning and can regulate their self-learning speed to make learning easier.[25]

Studies on the effects of e-learning on education of nursing students showed that students indicated higher satisfaction, active involvement in learning, easy access, and willing to use this educational technology;[26],[27] there are various reports about the influence of this method in teaching cardiac dysrhythmia as well as the interpretation of the ECG. Perfeito et al. reported nonsignificant difference comparing the methods of multimedia teaching and speech,[28] and on the other hand, Lee et al. applied videotapes to teach ventricular fibrillation in their study, the results indicated that this method had an immediate effect similar to the conventional lecture method and even had better results.[29] According to Mohammadi et al., both lecture and multimedia software teaching methods have been effective in learning the cardiac dysrhythmia for nursing students. However, there is a greater impact on students' knowledge durability after 2 months of teaching using multimedia software in comparison with the lecture method.[30] The results of a study by Aminizadeh et al. examining the use of both virtual and traditional teaching methods indicated that the scores obtained in items such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation as well as equipment and transfer courses in virtual education were higher than traditional method, but there was no significant difference in the triage item.[31]

Considering that the subjects related to cardiac dysrhythmia and ECG interpretations are associated with some weaknesses in nursing field, desirable knowledge in this area is of great importance to provide quality and safe services. In addition, considering that different educational methods have different effects in this regard, this study is carried out with the aim of comparison of the interpretation of cardiac dysrhythmia in nursing students trained by traditional and virtual teaching methods.

 Methods



This quasi-experimental study was performed as pre- and post-test. According to the related literature,[30] that the mean and standard deviation of students' knowledge score in relation to cardiac arrhythmias in the traditional education group was 13.41 ± 2.77 and in the multimedia training group was 15.87 ± 3.52. With 95% confidence and 80% probability, 27 samples were selected in each group, and considering 10% of sample loss, 30 people in each group and 60 people were selected in total as the sample of the study. The inclusion criteria for this study are as follows: nursing students in their seventh semester who were passing coronary care internship course clinically. Unwilling to participate in the study was considered as an exclusion criterion.

[INLINE:1]

To prevent possible bias of the intervention effect, cities of Urmia and Khoy were randomly assigned to traditional or virtual education groups. For random selection, A and B cards are scrambled and the managers of the nursing group of Urmia and Khoy each selected the desired paper. The A card was considered in the traditional education group and B card was placed in the virtual education group. Ultimately, Urmia is placed in the virtual education group and Khoy is selected in the traditional education group. The total number of undergraduate nursing students in Khoy was 30, but the number of undergraduate nursing students in Urmia was 42. To select 30 of them and minimize the effects of other variables, random number method was applied to assign 30 students as the study sample.

After obtaining permission from the Ethics Committee of Urmia University of Medical Sciences, the researcher referred to relevant centers to collect data. After explaining the goals of the study to eligible students to enter the study and ensuring that they will participate in the study, a pretest of cardiac dysrhythmia was performed on both groups. After the implementation of educational intervention, the questionnaire was completed by students as a posttest. In both groups, students spent 3 weeks in the cardiac internship course for 6 days and 6 h each day. Both groups are taught some subjects related to cardiac dysrhythmia, interpretation of the ECG, causes of dysrhythmia, and their therapeutic options.

In the virtual training group, in addition to the educational CD (containing the topics of cardiac dysrhythmia in the form of graphic images such as text, image, audio, and video), supplementary information (such as books and related files and answers to student questions) are provided to students through the internet (email and virtual network group). In this method, a coordination meeting and training session on how to use the content and contact the relevant teacher was held before the beginning of the course. During 3 weeks of internship, students were able to use the materials in the virtual network group and could share their content via e-mail and virtual network. After the completion of the above-mentioned course, the group in the virtual network was revoked. Preparing the educational materials, making them available on the internet, answering participants' questions, and eventually conducting the posttest were the role of trainers in this course. In the traditional education group, lecture, question and answer, and discussion methods were used. In this method, trainer presented the content to the participants, answered their questions, managed class discussions, and conducted a posttest examination. At the end of the courses, the educational resources were fully available to the students. Finally, both educational groups were interviewed about their preferential education in the future.

Data collecting tool was a researcher-made questionnaire. The first part of the questionnaire included demographic data such as age, gender, marital status, as well as questions about Internet connection and the average time of using the Internet, and the second part included 30 multiple-choice questions related to cardiac dysrhythmia. The correct answer scored 1, otherwise zero was considered for incorrect answer.

Content validity was used to determine the validity of the tool in this research. The questionnaire was delivered to 10 academic members of the Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery of Urmia University of Medical Sciences. Considering their corrective suggestions, the changes were finalized and approved. To determine the reliability, the questionnaire was completed by 20 nursing students and its reliability was obtained using Cronbach's alpha of 0.87.

Data were analyzed by SPSS version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) using descriptive and analytical tests (independent t-test and paired t-test). The statistical significance level in this study was considered to be 0.05.

 Results



The mean age of the students in the traditional education group was 23.033 ± 1.325 and in the virtual education group was 22.600 ± 0.932, which did not show significant differences. Twenty-four (80%) students of the traditional education group and twenty-nine (96.7%) in the virtual education group were single. In the virtual education group, 16 (53.3%) people had access to the Internet via mobile data, and the average duration of using the Internet in this group was 4.833 ± 1.549 h. Both at the educational methods were the preferred methods to educate the students [Table 1]. The mean and standard deviation of students' scores in the traditional education group before training was 11.200 ± 4.413 and after training was 14.400 ± 4.628 and in the training group before training was 11.300 ± 2.743 and after training was 18.433 ± 4.680. Paired t-test showed a significant difference between the mean scores obtained from the pre- and post-tests in both types of training (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between two groups before and after the training (P > 0.05). However, in the posttraining phase, there was a significant difference between the traditional and virtual groups (P < 0.001) [Table 2].{Table 1}{Table 2}

 Discussion



This is a study with the aim of comparison of two traditional and virtual teaching methods for identifying and employing effective and efficient methods for interpreting dysrhythmia in nursing students. The results of this quasi-experimental study indicated that both traditional and virtual methods have increased students' knowledge about cardiac dysrhythmia, but the virtual education method has had a greater impact. In the results, it must be mentioned that both groups indicated no significant difference in the level of knowledge in the pre-intervention stage, which is consistent with the findings of many other previous studies such as the study of Mohammadi et al.,[30] Baghaei et al.,[32] and Granero et al.[8] Reviewing the research population of this study and its related literature, it can be accepted that nursing students in the pre-intervention phase did not have much knowledge about the subject. In addition, lack of any difference between the two groups was an indication of similarity between the two groups of virtual and traditional education in the present study and above-mentioned ones. We immediately observed significant differences between both traditional and virtual groups' knowledge at the postintervention period, indicating the effectiveness of both methods; there was a significant difference with the pre-intervention stage, indicating the effect of both methods on increasing the students' knowledge. This result is consistent with the results of numerous studies such as the studies of Horiuchi et al.,[33] Jeffries et al.,[34] Sheikh AbuMasoudi and Soltani MollaYaghobi,[35] Mohammadi et al.,[30] as well as Baghaei et al.,[32] which indicated the effectiveness of both methods in promotion of the level of knowledge of learners. The results of these researches indicated the positive effect of both methods. Lack of any significant difference as well as similarity of the results of the two groups in the postintervention phase can become a cause for educational systems to apply the virtual education method in health sciences as the virtual training method has several advantages, such as providing reliable and reusable content, flexibility, and nongeographical constraints.[36] In addition, in e-learning, less learning time, increasing academic success, and learners' satisfaction are among the other benefits.[37],[38] E-learning was also effective in enhancing decision-making skills and critical thinking of medical students.[39] In the present study, the comparison of the scores of the two groups in the postintervention phase revealed a significant difference between the two groups. The virtual method could increase students' knowledge regarding cardiac dysrhythmia more than the traditional method. The results of this study are correspond to those of Chang and Hsu[40] and Granero-Molina et al.,[8] which indicated a significant difference after intervention in virtual method, while the results of the study by Badanara et al. indicated the effectiveness of the traditional method,[41] which is incompatible with the results of this study. Although various studies report the success of the virtual education method, it should also be noted that this type of training for independent and self-governing students who are more intended to these learning strategies is more effective naturally. Considering a number of factors such as learning needs, student preferences, and educational orientations, it is important to apply virtual education method.[33] Of course, considering the complexities of virtual education, more clinical trials need to be performed.

In this study, the participants had the opportunity to online communication with their trainer on social networks; the questions and answers raised by the students and the trainer were visible to other students and could be used by everyone. The advantages of this method have been confirmed in previous studies.[42],[43] There are important effects on better learning and success of educational method by establishing such an active engagement among the instructors and students, which has had a great effect on better teaching and learning, and can eliminate one of the unfavorable consequences of virtual education such as less interaction or even lack of it among the instructors and learners and so on. Lack of a follow-up program which indicates the effects of this educational method on durability of the students' knowledge is one of the limitations of this study, limiting the study to a specific group of the students, challenges with the possibility of generalization of the results to other health professions. Furthermore, it is impossible for patients to evaluate the outcomes of this method. Therefore, it is recommended to do more practical researches in the future considering the limitations of this study.

 Conclusion



The globalization of electronic devices in the world and the limitations of traditional education have made researchers to evaluate virtual learning methods. The results of this study indicated the positive significant effect of virtual education on nursing students' knowledge about cardiac dysrhythmia. Considering the plenty of advantages of the virtual teaching method such as being student-oriented, flexibility, lack of time and space limitation, coverage of a large number of learners, higher accessibility, and attractiveness, it is recommended as a preferred method. Therefore, this approach can be used as an alternative or complementary to traditional education. In addition, considering the positive effects of virtual social networking on learners' academic achievement, they can also be used as a powerful tool for creating learning environments based on most constructive approaches.

Acknowledgments

The present study is a research project approved by Urmia University of Medical Sciences with the ethics code of IR.UMSU.REC.1397.018. The researchers express their great thanks to the respectful Vice-President of Urmia University of Medical Sciences and the professors and students of the seventh semester of Nursing School of Urmia and Khoy.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Pontes PA, Chaves RO, Castro RC, de Souza ÉF, Seruffo MC, Francês CR. Educational software applied in teaching electrocardiogram: A systematic review. Biomed Res Int 2018;2018:8203875.
2Raupach T, Harendza S, Anders S, Schuelper N, Brown J. How can we improve teaching of ECG interpretation skills? Findings from a prospective randomised trial. J Electrocardiol 2016;49:7-12.
3Viljoen CA, Scott Millar R, Engel ME, Shelton M, Burch V. Is computer-assisted instruction more effective than other educational methods in achieving ECG competence among medical students and residents? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2017;7:e018811.
4Davies A, Vigo M, Harper S, Jay C. The visualisation of eye-tracking scanpaths: What can they tell us about how clinicians view electrocardiograms? IEEE Second Workshop on Eye Tracking and Visualization (ETVIS). In: Eye Tracking and Visualization (ETVIS). Baltimore, MD, USA: IEEE; 2017. p. 1-6.
5Lak K, Zareie F, Habibzadeh H, Mohammadpour Y, Rahnemoon K, Zare H, et al. A survey on the effect of educational software method of arrhythmias stimulator on the level of knowledge of electrocardiograms interpretation in nurses. Iran J Crit Care Nurs 2013;6:173-80.
6Funk M, Fennie KP, Stephens KE, May JL, Winkler CG, Drew BJ, et al. Association of implementation of practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring with nurses' knowledge, quality of care, and patient outcomes: Findings from the practical use of the latest standards of electrocardiography (PULSE) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2017;10. pii: e003132.
7Brooks CA, Kanyok N, O'Rourke C, Albert NM. Retention of baseline electrocardiographic knowledge after a blended-learning course. Am J Crit Care 2016;25:61-7.
8Granero-Molina J, Fernández-Sola C, López-Domene E, Hernández-Padilla JM, Preto LS, Castro-Sánchez AM. Effects of web-based electrocardiography simulation on strategies and learning styles. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2015;49:650-6.
9Omidifar N, Yamani N, Yousefi A. The effect of ECG training workshop on medical students' knowledge of ECG reading and interpretation. J Strides Dev Med Educ 2007;3(2):118-25.
10Breen CJ, Kelly GP, Kernohan WG. ECG interpretation skill acquisition: A review of learning, teaching and assessment. J Electrocardiol 2019. pii: S0022-0736(18)30641-1.
11Moffett J, Berezowski J, Spencer D, Lanning S. An investigation into the factors that encourage learner participation in a large group medical classroom. Adv Med Educ Pract 2014;5:65-71.
12Fent G, Gosai J, Purva M. Teaching the interpretation of electrocardiograms: Which method is best? J Electrocardiol 2015;48:190-3.
13Luscombe C, Montgomery J. Exploring medical student learning in the large group teaching environment: Examining current practice to inform curricular development. BMC Med Educ 2016;16:184.
14Mahler SA, Wolcott CJ, Swoboda TK, Wang H, Arnold TC. Techniques for teaching electrocardiogram interpretation: Self-directed learning is less effective than a workshop or lecture. Med Educ 2011;45:347-53.
15Fincher RM, Abdulla AM, Sridharan MR, Houghton JL, Henke JS. Teaching fundamental electrocardiography to medical students: Computer-assisted learning compared with weekly seminars. Res Med Educ 1987;26:197-202.
16Losco CD, Grant WD, Armson A, Meyer AJ, Walker BF. Effective methods of teaching and learning in anatomy as a basic science: A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no 44. Med Teach 2017;39:234-43.
17Montassier E, Hardouin JB, Segard J, Batard E, Potel G, Planchon B, et al. E-learning versus lecture-based courses in ECG interpretation for undergraduate medical students: A randomized noninferiority study. Eur J Emerg Med 2016;23:108-13.
18Nilsson M, Bolinder G, Held C, Johansson BL, Fors U, Ostergren J, et al. Evaluation of a web-based ECG-interpretation programme for undergraduate medical students. BMC Med Educ 2008;8:25.
19Rolskov Bojsen S, Räder SB, Holst AG, Kayser L, Ringsted C, Hastrup Svendsen J, et al. The acquisition and retention of ECG interpretation skills after a standardized web-based ECG tutorial-a randomised study. BMC Med Educ 2015;15:36.
20Pourmand A, Tanski M, Davis S, Shokoohi H, Lucas R, Zaver F, et al. Educational technology improves ECG interpretation of acute myocardial infarction among medical students and emergency medicine residents. West J Emerg Med 2015;16:133-7.
21Alavi M, Leidner DE. Research Commentary: Technology-Mediated Learning-a Call for Greater Depth and Breadth of Research. 2001;12(1):1-0. Information Systems; 2009.
22Garde S, Heid J, Haag M, Bauch M, Weires T, Leven FJ, et al. Can design principles of traditional learning theories be fulfilled by computer-based training systems in medicine: The example of CAMPUS. Int J Med Inform 2007;76:124-9.
23Cook DA. Web-based learning: Pros, cons and controversies. Clin Med (Lond) 2007;7:37-42.
24Kaveevivitchai C, Chuengkriankrai B, Luecha Y, Thanooruk R, Panijpan B, Ruenwongsa P. Enhancing nursing students' skills in vital signs assessment by using multimedia computer-assisted learning with integrated content of anatomy and physiology. Nurse Educ Today 2009;29:65-72.
25Huang EW, Chen YJ, Yang SF, Cheng PJ, Shih CY, Yen YC. Design and implementation of a multimedia education system for nursing physical examination. J Taiwan Assoc Med Inform 2006;15:1-10.
26Ryan M, Carlton KH, Ali NS. Evaluation of traditional classroom teaching methods versus course delivery via the world wide web. J Nurs Educ 1999;38:272-7.
27Voutilainen A, Saaranen T, Sormunen M. Conventional vs. e-learning in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today 2017;50:97-103.
28Perfeito JA, Forte V, Giudici R, Succi JE, Lee JM, Sigulem D. Development and assessment of a multimedia computer program to teach pleural drainage techniques. J Bras Pneumol 2008;34:437-44.
29Lee YK, Chuang CH, Wong CH, Yang CH, Shih CY. Evaluate the efficacy of video assisted learning in ventricular fibrillation training: A prospective randomized single-blind study. J Taiwan Emerg Med 2005;7:154-62.
30Mohammadi B, Vahedparast H, RavaniPour M, Sadeghei T. Comparing the effects of heart dysrhythmia training through both lecture and multimedia software approaches on the knowledge retention of nursing students. Educ Dev Jundishapur 2015;6:115-21.
31Aminizadeh M, Saberinia A, Kohan S, Shokouhi I, Fagihi A, Aminizadeh E. A comparison of virtual and traditional teaching methods in the functional skills of paramedical technicians in pre-hospital emergency. Dev Steps Med Educ 2015;12:388-98.
32Baghaei R, Rasouli D, Rahmani A, Mohammadpour Y, Jafarizadeh H. Effect of web-based education on cardiac Dysrhythmia learning in nursing student of Urmia University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ 2012;12:240-8.
33Horiuchi S, Yaju Y, Koyo M, Sakyo Y, Nakayama K. Evaluation of a web-based graduate continuing nursing education program in Japan: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse Educ Today 2009;29:140-9.
34Jeffries PR, Woolf S, Linde B. Technology-based vs. traditional instruction. A comparison of two methods for teaching the skill of performing a 12-lead ECG. Nurs Educ Perspect 2003;24:70-4.
35Sheikh AbuMasoudi R, Soltani MollaYaghobi N. Comparison the effect of electronic learning and teaching based on lecture on knowledge of nursing students about heart dysrhythmias in 2014: A short report. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci 2015;14:339-44.
36Choules AP. The use of elearning in medical education: A review of the current situation. Postgrad Med J 2007;83:212-6.
37Kim JA. The development and effectiveness of web based continuing nurse education program. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm 2011;7:361-75.
38Belfry MJ, Winne PH. A review of the effectiveness of computer assisted instruction in nursing education. Comput Nurs 1988;6:77-85.
39Thakore H, McMahon T. An interactive e-tutorial in pathology. Med Educ 2006;40:1135.
40Chang MH, Hsu LL. Multimedia instruction: Its efficacy in nurse electrocardiography learning. Hu Li Za Zhi 2010;57:50-8.
41Badanara A, Emami Sigaroudi A, Kazemnezhad-Leyli E, Poursheikhian M. Compare the effect of two electronic and traditional education methods on first principles of instruction in nursing students of Guilan University of Medical Sciences in 2016. Res Med Educ 2018;10:48-55.
42Chi MT, Siler SA, Jeong H, Yamauchi T, Hausmann RG. Learning from human tutoring. Cogn Sci 2001;25:471-533.
43Bloom BS. The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educ Res 1984;13:4-16.