Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 
Users Online: 1010
Home Print this page Email this page

 



 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
J Edu Health Promot 2019,  8:26

An assessment of emergency department information systems based on the HL7 functional profile


1 Assistant Professor, Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Researcher, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Department of Information Technology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Date of Submission09-Mar-2018
Date of Acceptance21-Apr-2018
Date of Web Publication15-Feb-2019

Correspondence Address:
Ms. Farzaneh Hazhir
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezar Jarib Street, Isfahan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_64_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

CONTEXT: Emergency Department Information System (EDIS) plays a significant role in supporting the emergency department (ED) workflow. Hence, it is vital to assess the services provided by this system in order to identify its strengths and weaknesses.
AIMS: The study aimed to assess the information systems in use in the ED of 11 teaching hospitals associated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS) so as to identify their strengths and weaknesses and improving the quality of these systems.
SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This study was conducted using descriptive-applied research method.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Data collection tool was a checklist developed based on EDIS functional profile. It covered two sections of the profile, namely direct care and supportive functions and their respective subsections.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics through the estimation of the frequency and frequency percentage for each respective section and subsections using SPSS software v. 20.
RESULTS: The content conformance rate of the information systems in use in the EDs of IUMS' teaching hospitals was found to be 49.72% and 75.25% for the direct care section and supportive functions section, respectively. In addition, the overall conformance rate in the hospitals surveyed was up to 53.15%.
CONCLUSION: As per the findings of this study, it is suggested that some important clinical and administrative functions should be incorporated into the redesigned information systems in use in the EDs under study.

Keywords: Assessment, emergency department information system functional profile, emergency department information system, HL7


How to cite this article:
Saghaeiannejad-Isfahani S, Hazhir F, Jalali R. An assessment of emergency department information systems based on the HL7 functional profile. J Edu Health Promot 2019;8:26

How to cite this URL:
Saghaeiannejad-Isfahani S, Hazhir F, Jalali R. An assessment of emergency department information systems based on the HL7 functional profile. J Edu Health Promot [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 May 23];8:26. Available from: http://www.jehp.net/text.asp?2019/8/1/26/252393


  Introduction Top


Information system is one of the best methods that enables gathering, refining, sorting, and inferring the information correctly and timely for use by all the decision makers.[1] One of the most important information systems in the health-care domain is the Emergency Department Information System (EDIS)[2] which can be implemented either as a subsystem of the hospital information system or a standalone system in the emergency department (ED).[3] EDIS can be technically defined as an electronic health record system specially developed for the management of information and workflow, supporting the patient care in the ED and emergency operations.[4]

This system is often used for different purposes such as tracking the ED patients, managing the patient information, and providing access to the required data for the clinical experts and managers in the ED. Hence, it enjoys different administrative and clinical functions including the registry, storage, and retrieval of the information about the patient registration, clinical documentation, diagnostic test orderings, tracking the status of the diagnostic test, ED resources' management, diagnoses, and medical operations as well as reporting,[5] supporting the clinical decisions,[4],[6],[7],[8],[9] clinical coding, and accounting.[4]

EDIS has numerous advantages for the ED, namely improving the ED's performance,[10] reducing the costs by decreased paper use, enhancing the work productivity of the clinical professionals,[4] providing easier and more rapid access to the patient's information through its integration with other information systems in use in the hospital,[4],[11] allowing better and more accurate record of the clinical and administrative information, assisting the decision-making and reducing the medical errors,[4] and removing the limitations resulting from the paper records such as lack of simultaneous access to the record information by multiple users or record illegibility.[12]

Despite the numerous advantages of EDIS[3] and its increasingly common usage during the recent years in different nations,[13] the adoption and application rate of such system is not still pervasive.[3],[14],[15] Even some cases of system implementation failures have been reported for different reasons such as lack of support for the workflow,[16] decreased ED efficiency, and increased patient waiting times and crowding.[4] Accordingly, to prevent the possible failure of the information system, modifying and improving the system in proportion to the user's requirements and incorporating the required functions into the system seem to be an inventible necessity. This in turn is only possible by the assessment of the information system.[17] Ensuring the long-term success of this system, the assessment of the EDIS's functions is necessary so as to identify its strengths and weaknesses, take the necessary measures for removing its weaknesses and, finally, improve the system's functions.[18] Accordingly, taking the significance of this issue into account, the present study tried to assess the functions of EDISs in use in the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences' (IUMS's) teaching hospitals in terms of the functional profile (FP) HL7 to identify the strengths and weaknesses of this system.


  Subjects and Methods Top


This study was conducted using applied-descriptive research method in 2017. Research population included all the EDISs in use in 11 teaching hospitals of IUMS [Table 1]. Due to the limited size of the statistical population, the entire population was used as the sample which was further assessed by the census method. EDISs under study were of four types, namely Kowsar, Pouya Samaneh Diba, Hamedan Sayan Rayan Ekbatan, and Rayavaran Toseeh systems. It is noteworthy that except the Kowsar system, the other systems are also used in other hospitals all across Iran.
Table 1: Teaching hospitals under study in terms of the type of emergency department information systems


Click here to view


Data were collected through observation as well as a checklist prepared based on the EDIS-FP issued by the HL7 organization in 2007. EDIS-FP is a project developed by HL7 Emergency Care Special Interest Group. Creating a set of functions for the EDIS, this project incorporates a number of certain conformance criteria to be used for system assessment purpose. In general, EDIS-FP covers three major sections including direct care, supportive functions, and information infrastructures. The focus of this study was on the direct care and supportive functions sections ignoring the information infrastructures' section due to its emphasis on the technical features of the system such as security, standard terminologies, and interoperability based on the guidelines. In the functional profile, the direct care refers to those system functions which are used for the provision of the patient care and clinical decision support. By definition, supportive functions are a set of functions that back the health-care provision and optimization, generally without placing any effect on the direct care of the patients. Along with the financial and administrative requirements, these functions provide support for the medical research, general health, and health-care quality improvement.[19] As it was mentioned earlier, the checklist used in this study was composed of two sections: direct care (including three subsections of care management, clinical decision support, and operations' management and communication) and supportive functions (including three subsections of clinical support; measurement, analysis, research, and reports; and administrative and financial). In whole, it consisted of 268 items which have been assigned the level of priority of E (i.e. essential) and have the keyword of “shall” in their statement formulation. The major sections, subsections, and the number of items per each section have been summarized in [Table 2]. The content validity of the research instrument was validated by pooling the ideas of the professors of the Health Information Technology faculty as well as the experts of the IUMS's Information Technology Office.
Table 2: The main sections, subsections, and the number of items for every section in the checklist


Click here to view


Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics through the estimation of the frequency and frequency percentage for each respective section and subsections using SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0, IBM company, Armonk, New York, United States) [Table 3].
Table 3: Content conformance rates obtained for the studied emergency department information systems in terms of the sections and subsections incorporated in the checklist


Click here to view



  Results Top


The rate of the content conformance estimated for the EDISs in use in the teaching hospitals of IUMS was found to be 49.72% and 75.25% for the direct care and supportive functions' section, respectively. Furthermore, the estimated rates of content conformance for each subsections of the direct care were as follows: 52.74% for care management, 43.93% for the clinical decision support, and 29.43% for the management of the operations and communications. As for the subsections of the supportive functions, the content conformance rate was found to be 83.76% for the clinical support; 73.37% for the measurement, analysis, research, and reports; and 63.63% for the administrative and financial subsections. The total content conformance rate was also found to be up to 53.15%. As for the direct care section, care management (52.74%) and operations and communications' management subsections (29.43%) enjoyed the highest and lowest rates of conformity, respectively. For the supportive functions' category, the highest conformance rate was observed for the subsection of clinical support (83.76%), while the lowest conformance rate was obtained for the management, administrative, and financial subsection (63.63%). More details about the content conformance rate of the EDISs in terms of the main sections and their respective subsections have been summarized in [Table 3]. The main strengths and weaknesses identified for the EDISs in question have also been presented in [Table 4] and [Table 5] separately for two sections of direct care and supportive functions.
Table 4: The most important strengths and weaknesses identified for the emergency department information systems in use in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences' teaching hospitals for the subsections of direct care


Click here to view
Table 5: The most important strengths and weaknesses identified for the emergency department information systems in use in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences' teaching hospitals for the subsection of the supportive functions


Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The main purpose of the present study was to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the EDISs in use in IUMS's teaching hospitals so as to promote the functions of such systems. As per the obtained results, the rate of content conformance of the EDISs with the EDIS-FP was medium (49.72%) for the direct care section and desirable (75.25%) for the supportive functions. The total conformance rate was medium (53.15%).

The lowest conformance rate in the direct care and supportive functions' sections was observed for the operations' management and communications' subsection and financial and administrative subsections, respectively. As it is evident, the content conformance rate of the direct care section was lower than that of the supportive functions' section. It can be attributed to the weakness of the clinical functions of the system compared to the administrative functions. Shortly, operations' management and communications' subsection under the direct care category obtained the lowest conformity rate due to the lack of the functions related to the management of the clinical job descriptions and communication with the external providers. In contrast, the financial and administrative subsection subsumed under the operations' management and communications' section showed the lowest conformance rate because the system failed to support some functions including the accessibility to all the patient-related information so as to support the diagnostic encoding and operations and care results and preparing a comprehensive record of the patients' admission to the ED.

According to the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care survey in 2011, from among 14 functions as determined based on the federal standards' stipulations, only these functions have been incorporated in the electronic health record in use in 14% of the EDs: 1.order writing and entry of prescriptions, 2.warnings about the drug interactions or contraindication, 3.the entry of demographic and patient history information, 4.the list of patient problems, 5.clinical transcripts including the list of the drugs currently dispensed by the patient and allergies, 6.reminders for interventions proposed based on the guidelines, screening tests as well as drug interactions and contraindications, 7.preparing clinical summaries for the patients for each visit, and 8.electronic exchange of the clinical summaries with other care providers. This study revealed that none of the systems supported four functions including the entry of vital signs, smoking condition, preparing and sending the service quality reports, and preparing the electronic copies of health information.[20] The majority of the EDISs surveyed in this study were found to support the functions of the electronic entry of the diagnostic and drug orders, the entry of the demographic information, the record of the vital signs and reporting, considered as the most important functions, and strengths of the information systems in question. In this regard, the results obtained from our study were in line with those of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care survey. However, none of the systems had the functions of the drug contraindication and drug dosage warnings, reminders of guideline-based interventions, reminders of screening tests, reminders of drug, the entry of the information on the medical histories, the listing of patient problems as well as the electronic exchange of the history summaries with other care providers. It is noteworthy that such functions are deemed as vital for achieving a comprehensive EDIS. However, the results of this study did not conform to the results obtained in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care survey. Lack of participation of the emergency team in the development process of the system and the users' resistance toward using such functions due to the work overload are among the possible causes for the lack of such functions. According to numerous studies, the clinical decision support can enhance the patient safety through lowering the errors and providing the information, guideline-based recommendations, and warnings on the drug allergies and contraindication. This, in turn, allows better decision-making and better service delivery for the ED patients.[21],[22] Furthermore, besides being a very good educational resource, the clinical guidelines incorporated in the EDIS might facilitate the evidence-based decision-making by the practitioners[6] improving emergency patient care provision.[23]

In one study, Landman et al. have argued that a comprehensive EDIS must support the function of preparing and sending the general health reporting as well as the function of information exchange with other systems.[8] In this study, all the hospitals in question were found to support the function of preparing and sending the reports using their EDISs. Although this reporting function does not cover all the reports required by the ED due to the incomplete collection of the information, it somewhat satisfies the requirements of the ED. This result was in full conformity with the results of the study by Landman et al. It is noteworthy that all the EDISs in use in the hospitals in question failed to support the function of the information exchange with other health-care centers due to the lack of appropriate infrastructures.

As per the findings of another study by Mayer et al. conducted in the ED of one hospital in America, the interns used emergency information system for tracking the patients.[24] The EDISs studied here were not equipped with a monitor for accurate tracking of the emergency patients. The EDISs only supported the function of displaying room number or emergency bed number. This result contradicted the findings of Mayer et al.'s study. Patient tracking from the time of his/her admission in the ED to the discharge time may be advantageous for knowing the movement flow of the patients and their current position, coordinating the operations better, knowing the patient wait time and, finally, refining the ED's performance.[25]

Rao in his study in an Indian hospital reported that compared to the paper operations, the EDIS allows more rapid access to the diagnostic codes reported in the International Classification of Diseases book, vital signs, allergies, and notes of the assessment of the patients' status.[6] In this study, none of the EDISs in question could be characterized as a comprehensive electronic health record due to usage of paper-based profiles together with the system. Hence, they did not provide the function of accessibility to all the patient-related information required for the diagnosis and encoding of operations and results. Hence, this result was not in line with that obtained in Rao's study.

Besides the strengths summarized in [Table 4], the EDISs in question lacked some major functions such as clinical documentation, diagnostic record, the possibility of creation of precompiled guidelines for the patients with similar condition for time-saving purpose, the receipt of disease history, creation of legal records for transferring the patient, clinical decision support, and information exchange with other medical centers. Despite numerous benefits of EDIS, its broad and sophisticated functions are not fully exploited by Iran's hospitals for some factors. These factors could be classified into three subcategories, namely organizational, technical, and human factors. From among organizational factors, lack of organizational and technical support, managers' unwillingness toward investment on the advanced informational systems due to the high costs required for the information system development, purchase and technical support, crowding and high workload in the ED, insufficient training of the personnel about how to work with the system, and the application of paper records as a legal resource in the courts and invalidity of the electronic records can be enumerated. As for the technical factors, the following ones can be named: the low quality of system and collected information, problems relating to the information security and privacy, unexpected failure of the system and the loss of patient information and lack of specific laws, and regulations and requirements regarding the essential functions to be incorporated in the EDIS in Iran. For the human factors' category, the following cases can be mentioned: lengthy time required for the entry of the information into the system by the personnel, the resistance of the ED's personnel toward the entry of the information in the paper records, the low computer knowledge of the ED's personnel, workforce shortage in the ED and the request of the patients for receiving the emergency care services at the earliest, weakening of the interactions between the health-care providers and the patients, and lack of participation of the ED's personnel in designing the system's functions.

The results of this study can assist the system designers and developers to improve the available functions and integrate the new functions into the information systems in use in the EDs. This, in turn, will lead to better management of the information and the ED resources and improvement of delivery of the care services.

The current study was the first of its kind on the assessment of EDISs based on the HL7 functional profile to compare the functions of the information systems in use in the EDs of the selected hospitals with standardized functions of these systems in the world. With the exception of Kowsar system, all the EDISs surveyed are also used in other parts of the country. As a result, the findings of this study can reflect an overall picture of the status of these systems in Iran.

One of the limitations of the study was the difficult and time-consuming process of information gathering, given the high workload of the ED staff and their high interaction with the system.


  Conclusion Top


Taking the findings of this study into account, it is recommended that the following functions–as the most important functions–to be put at the top of the priority list when redesigning the EDISs in question: recording the clinical information and the cares provided for the patients in the system rather than using paper records; recording the diagnoses, surgeries, and other measures taken for the patients; obtaining the disease, family, and social histories of the patient; performing the medical follow-ups for the discharged patients; managing the clinical job description of the care providers; creating the legal records for transferring the patients; receiving the drug contraindication, reactions and allergies for the patient, and their respective reporting; supporting the advanced clinical decisions regarding drug–drug and drug–diet interactions, drug contraindication, allergies, and drug dosages; exchanging information with other medical centers; producing comprehensive reports from the patient records and other reports required by the ED; and providing access to all the information required for coding the diagnoses and procedures.

Acknowledgment

This study was a result of a research project with the code 295162 confirmed and financially sponsored by the Health Information Technology Research Center in IUMS. Hence, it is up to us to express our deepest gratitude to all those who helped us in conducting this research, especially the authorities of the 11 teaching hospitals situated in Isfahan city for their sincere cooperation.

Financial support and sponsorship

This research was confirmed and financially sponsored by the Health Information Technology Research Center in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Khajouei R, Saghaeiannejad-Isfahani S, Jahanbakhsh M, Mirmohammadi M. Assessment of the performance of the laboratory information system (LIS) based on the standards of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). J Health Biomed Inform 2015;2:8-16.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Khajouei R, Azizi A, Atashi A. Usability evaluation of an emergency information system: A heuristic evaluation. J Health Adm 2013;16:61-72.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Callen J, Li L, Georgiou A, Paoloni R, Gibson K, Li J, et al. Does an integrated emergency department information system change the sequence of clinical work? A mixed-method cross-site study. Int J Med Inform 2014;83:958-66.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Rothenhaus T, Kamens D, Keaton B, Nathanson L, Nielson J, Mcclay JC, et al. Emergency Department Information Systems: primer for Emergency Physicians, Nurses and IT Professionals; 15 April, 2009. Available from: http://www.acep.org/workarea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=45756. [Last accessed on 2017 Apr 25].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ceglowski AS, Churilov L. Towards process-of-care aware emergency department information systems: A clustering approach to activity views elicitation. Int J Healthc Inform Syst Inform 2008;3:1-16.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Rao U. Impact of emergency department information system on patient tracking and clinical documentation. Int J Health Sci Res 2015;5:271-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Inokuchi R, Sato H, Nakamura K, Aoki Y, Shinohara K, Gunshin M, et al. Motivations and barriers to implementing electronic health records and ED information systems in Japan. Am J Emerg Med 2014;32:725-30.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Landman AB, Bernstein SL, Hsiao AL, Desai RA. Emergency department information system adoption in the United States. Acad Emerg Med 2010;17:536-44.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ward MJ, Landman AB, Case K, Berthelot J, Pilgrim RL, Pines JM, et al. The effect of electronic health record implementation on community emergency department operational measures of performance. Ann Emerg Med 2014;63:723-30.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Landman A, Teich JM, Pruitt P, Moore SE, Theriault J, Dorisca E, et al. The boston marathon bombings mass casualty incident: One emergency department's information systems challenges and opportunities. Ann Emerg Med 2015;66:51-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kahouei M, Eskrootchi R, Ebadi-Fard-Azar F. Conceptual model designing of clinical staff's information needs of emergency information system. Payavard Salamat 2013;7:217-27.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Stokes-Buzzelli S, Peltzer-Jones JM, Martin GB, Ford MM, Weise A. Use of health information technology to manage frequently presenting emergency department patients. West J Emerg Med 2010;11:348-53.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Clark LN, Guarrera TK, McGeorge NM, Hettinger AZ, Hernandez A, LaVergne DT, et al. Usability Evaluation and Assessment of a Novel Emergency Department IT System Developed using a Cognitive Systems Engineering Approach. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care; 2014: SAGE Publication; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Shapiro JS, Baumlin KM, Chawla N, Genes N, Godbold J, Ye F, et al. Emergency department information system implementation and process redesign result in rapid and sustained financial enhancement at a large academic center. Acad Emerg Med 2010;17:527-35.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kim MS, Shapiro JS, Genes N, Aguilar MV, Mohrer D, Baumlin K, et al. A pilot study on usability analysis of emergency department information system by nurses. Appl Clin Inform 2012;3:135-53.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, Car J, Pagliari C, Pluye P, et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst 2012;36:241-77.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Mehraeen E, Ahmadi M, Shajarat M, Khoshgam M. Assessment Of hospital information system in selected hospitals in Tehran. Payavard Salamat 2013;6:458-66.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Saghaeiannejad-Isfahani S, Saeedbakhsh S, Jahanbakhsh M, Habibi M. Assessment and comparison of hospital information systems in Isfahan hospitals based on the adjusted Delone and McLean model. Dir Gen 2011;8:620.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Rothenhaus TC, Kamens D, McClay J, Coonan K. Emergency Department Information Systems (EDIS) Functional Profile; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Jamoom E, Hing E. Progress with electronic health record adoption among emergency and outpatient departments: United States, 2006-2011. NCHS Data Brief 2015;187:1-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Handel DA, Hackman JL. Implementing electronic health records in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 2010;38:257-63.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Inokuchi R, Sato H, Nakajima S, Shinohara K, Nakamura K, Gunshin M, et al. Development of information systems and clinical decision support systems for emergency departments: A long road ahead for Japan. Emerg Med J 2013;30:914-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Asaro PV, Sheldahl AL, Char DM. Physician perspective on computerized order-sets with embedded guideline information in a commercial emergency department information system. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005:6-10.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Mayer PH, Yaron M, Lowenstein SR. Impact on length of stay after introduction of emergency department information system. West J Emerg Med 2010;11:329-32.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Vezyridis P, Timmons S, Wharrad H. Going paperless at the emergency department: A socio-technical study of an information system for patient tracking. Int J Med Inform 2011;80:455-65.  Back to cited text no. 25
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed158    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded27    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal