Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 
Users Online: 665
Home Print this page Email this page

 



 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
J Edu Health Promot 2019,  8:254

Psychometric properties of the Persian version of nutrition literacy scale in the elderly


1 School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Environmental and Occupational Hazards Control Research Center, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Date of Submission10-Jul-2019
Date of Acceptance18-Sep-2019
Date of Web Publication31-Dec-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sakineh Rakhshanderou
School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tabnak Ave., Daneshjou Blvd., Velenjak, P.O. Box 19835.35511, Tehran
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_387_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

INTRODUCTION: Aging and chronic diseases associated with nutrition are increasing in the world; therefore, access to a tool for assessing nutritional literacy in the elderly is necessary. Therefore, the present study was carried out with the aim of psychometric evaluation of nutritional literacy in the elderly.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was carried out to psychometric testing of the Nutrition Literacy Scale (NLS), through the validity and reliability of the tool in 280 elderly people (60 years of age and older) in Tehran. The validity of this tool was determined through the methods of translation, face and content and reliability of the tool through the methods of test–retest and internal consistency. Finally, the tool was analyzed using SPSS software version 16.
RESULTS: In this study, content validity index (CVI) was calculated for each item; CVI average was 0.86.5. To determine the reliability of the tool, interclass correlation coefficient was calculated by measuring the instrument's stability, and it was 0.92. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the existence of six factors in the questionnaire, which was named nutritional information, healthy nutrition, calorie intake, organic foods, saturated fats, and unit size, which explains 43% of the total variance. Furthermore, in the internal consistency assessment, the questionnaire was completed by 280 elderly people, and the Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.80.
CONCLUSION: Based on the results obtained in the reliability and validity assessment, NLS in Iranian elderly has a desirable reliability and validity. This questionnaire has been translated into Persian for the first time. The results of this study provide a standard tool for assessing nutritional literacy status in Persian language communities.

Keywords: Elderly, nutritional literacy, reliability, validity


How to cite this article:
Sharifnia F, Ghaffari M, Rakhshanderou S. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of nutrition literacy scale in the elderly. J Edu Health Promot 2019;8:254

How to cite this URL:
Sharifnia F, Ghaffari M, Rakhshanderou S. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of nutrition literacy scale in the elderly. J Edu Health Promot [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Apr 10];8:254. Available from: http://www.jehp.net/text.asp?2019/8/1/254/274483


  Introduction Top


In many countries, the population above 60 years of age has more rapid growth than other age groups due to the increase in life expectancy and decrease in mortality rate.[1] In 2050, 80% of old population will live in low- and average-income countries. For example, up to 2050, most of this old population (120 million people) will live in China.[2] It is predicted that elderly population of Iran in 2050 reaches to more than 26 million people (21.7%).[3]

In 2014, chronic diseases were accounted for 76% of deaths in Iran.[4] The burden of chronic diseases on the healthcare systems is high and considerable. On the other hand, self-care and the responsibility of patients as well as patients' social networks should be considered in healthcare management.[5],[6]

Food consumption models, lifestyle behaviors, and body weight are associated with the progress of chronic diseases such as diabetes Type II, certain cancers, and cardiovascular diseases.[7] Some studies have shown that the improvement of nutrition has considerable effect on the health of people.[8] The correction of nutrition can significantly increase efficiency and independence of elderly people and help them in controlling different side effects of old age and different treatments.[9]

Understanding the importance of nutrition and healthy food behavior is important for preventing and managing many chronic diseases. The studies have shown that literacy is an important and effective factor in food habits.[10] Many authors consider nutritional literacy as a kind of health literacy which indicates the ability to interpret and use nutrition information.[10],[11]

Nutritional literacy is an important factor in food habits, especially among the deprived people[12] such that high nutritional literacy skills have positive relationship with the healthy food habits.[13] Nutritional literacy can be defined as the ability of people for gaining, processing, and understanding nutritional information and required skills for suitable nutrition decision-making.[10]

In the study by Aihara and Minai in the elderly aged over 75 years, nutritional literacy evaluated through terms of the ability to obtain basic diet information, specifically the participant's knowledge of the contents of the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top.[14] In the study by Zoellner et al. among adults, survey instruments included the Newest Vital Sign and an adapted version of the Health Information National Trends Survey.[15]

Although nutritional literacy has a great impact on the health of the elderly, there is no adequate and concise tool for measuring the nutritional literacy of the elderly. Hence, preparing a valid tool is necessary to measure this concept. The first version of nutritional literacy tool has been designed using the information obtained from food and nutrition center of Mayo clinic, agriculture ministry of United States for nutrition policy and improvement, and other nutrition websites. The validity and reliability of this tool was assessed with Cronbach's alpha 0.84 in the US.[16] The reliability and validity of this tool should be confirmed to use it in the country. Therefore, this study aims to determine the psychometric properties of nutritional literacy Persian version.


  Materials and Methods Top


This research is a methodological study which was conducted among the elderlies of Tehran (60 years of age and older) in 2018. Methodological study was used to develop, validate, test, and evaluate the research instruments and methods. 10 samples was estimated for each question for construct validity[17], Totally 280 samples.

Therefore, considering 10 sample for each item, 280 samples were selected. Samples were selected using cluster random sampling. First, be referring to the staff centers, a list of covered healthcare centers was prepared. Then, one center was selected from each staff with simple random sampling, and samples size was determined with systematic random sampling. Inclusion criteria in this study were voluntary and informed consent to participate in research, minimum writing and reading literacy, having family case in healthcare system, and able to complete the questionnaire by the elderly, and exclusion criteria was incomplete questionnaire. This research was conducted by obtaining introduction letter from related organizations, and the participation of people and study units was voluntary, and they ensured that the information was confidential.

Nutrition Literacy Scale (NLS) has designed using information obtained from Mayo food and nutrition clinic, US ministry of agriculture for nutrition policy, and other related nutrition websites[18] and was completed between 2004 and 2006 by 341 patients in four separate administrations. Three groups of patients were part of a University-Based Family Medicine Practice. One of these groups (Group 4) specifically included overweight and obese patients. The validity and reliability of this tool was assessed with Cronbach's alpha 0.84 in the US.[16] Questionnaire includes 28 questions related to organic food and calorie consumption. Its items reflect the individuals related to healthy nutrition, saturated fats, and unit size. Questions of each section are sorted from easy to difficult. Closing method has been used in NLS. Closing method is a valid method for understanding.[19] NLS asks for correct answer to complete a statement from a 4-item list. The required time to complete questionnaire is 10 min. NLS has 28 items, and the score of each item is either 1 (true) or 0 (false). Total scores were considered in the analysis. The highest percent shows the highest nutritional literacy, and the lowest percent is the lowest nutritional literacy. Scores between 0 and 14 show insufficient nutritional literacy, 15–21 are borderline nutritional literacy, and 22–28 show the sufficient nutritional literacy. This questionnaire has been used in a similar study by Patel et al. to evaluate the nutritional literacy in the elderly.[18]

Tool validity

Translation validity

Forward–backward standard method of WHO was used to translate questionnaire.[20] To determine translation validity, the main questionnaire was first translated by two proficient Iranian translators from English to Persian. In the next step, 2 English language experts translated the Persian questionnaire again to English (backtranslation). Then, NLS main version was compared with the translated versions to determine whether the concepts are unique. After adjusting translations, the initial version of questionnaire was prepared in Persian with good quality.

Face validity

To determine face validity, Persian questionnaire was completed by 10 elderly people to evaluate its fluency, clarity, resolution, and fit. Regarding the feedback of this group, the required changes were done to increase resolution and understanding of the questionnaires.

Content validity

Content validity of questionnaire was confirmed with qualitative and quantitative methods. In qualitative content analysis, NLS was evaluated by 7 experts in this field (including 3 nutrition specialists, 4 health education and health promotion experts) based on the Persian language grammar, and using simple and easy words. In quantitative content analysis, Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) were evaluated by 7 experts.

Regarding CVR, each question from 28 questions evaluated with three terms: “Essential,” “Useful but not essential,” and “Not necessary,” and responses were calculated based on CVR formula.[21]



ne= The number of panelists indicating “essential.”

N = The total number of panelists.

Relatedness, resolution, and simplicity were used as three criteria to calculate CVI using 5-point Likert scale. Finally, CVI score was calculated by the total number of concessions with rank 3 and 4 on the total number of specialists.[22] Then, questions with CVR of 0.99 and CVI of 0.79 and higher were preserved in questionnaire.

Construct validity

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to determine construct validity. The questionnaire was distributed among 280 elderly people (60 years and higher) based on the inclusion criteria. EFA was done by principle component analysis (PCA) using Varimax rotation. To keep an item in the EFA, cutpoint of 0.3 was considered. After extracting factors and items in each factor, their consistency with concepts and main dimensions of nutritional literacy was studied.

Tool reliability

To evaluate the tool stability, questionnaire was given to 30 elderly people with 15 days interval, and then, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to measure internal consistency.


  Results Top


In this research, data of 280 elderly people were gathered, coded, and entered into computer. Then, the data were analyzed using SPSS software 16. SPSS was designed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) company for use at Stanford University Chicago.[23] Majority of the elderly were in the age group of 60–65 (41.9%), 65–70 (28.9%), and 70 years and higher (29.3%). 143 of them were female (53%) and 127 were male (47%). Most of them had primary school education (59.3%) and only 21 people (7.8%) had university degree. The occupation study showed that 137 of them were employed (50.7%) and 133 of them were unemployed (49.3%). 159 (58.9%) elderly people had moderate and 111 (41.1%) had weak economic conditions.

In qualitative face validity, required changes were done by considering the feedback of elderly people to provide more resolution and understanding.

In qualitative content validity, question number 13 was changed based on the advice of experts and researcher opinion to make it more understandable. [Table 1] shows CVI and CVR were calculated for each question. Average CVI was measured as 0.86. Since all questions had CVR higher than 0.99 and CVI higher than 0.78, all questions were kept.
Table 1: Content Validity Ratio and Content Validity Index of Nutrition Literacy Scale

Click here to view


To study factor structure of NLS in elderly people of Iran, EFA was used with principle components method and Varimax rotation. Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's test were used to evaluate the possibility of factor analysis on data. KMO measure of sampling adequacy was 0.79. Results of Bartlett sphericity test indicated the significant correlations between items (χ2 = 1184/606, df = 378, P < 0.001). These results indicate the adequacy of sample size and justify the factor analysis. [Table 2] shows 6 extracted factors from the scale and variance of factor analysis including nutritional knowledge with variance of 16.724%, healthy nutrition with variance of 7.293%, calorie use (5.107%), organic food (4.696%), saturation fats (4.430%), and portion size (4.213%) which totally explain 43% of total variance. Cut point of 0.3 was considered for factor loads.
Table 2: Factor loading of the Nutrition Literacy Scale items

Click here to view


Discriminant and known-group validity

Discriminant validity showed that male older people scored significantly higher on all compared to female older people. The known-group was used for discriminant validity of the NLS.

[Table 3] shows the variables of gender and education level. Participants with higher educational levels scored significantly higher on the total score (P < 0.001) and all factors.
Table 3: Comparison of known groups: mean and standard deviation of Nutrition Literacy Scale based on the gender and educational level

Click here to view


[Table 4] shows that there is a significant consistency between before and after tests scores in test–retest results (P < 0.001). ICC was 0.92 and Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.67–0.76.
Table 4: The internal consistency and stability reliability of the Nutrition Literacy Scale Farsi version

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Given the importance of nutritional literacy in the elderly, this study investigated the psychometric properties of the NLS questionnaire. In each study, research tool is an instrument by which researcher gathers data carefully, and after analysis, achieves required conclusions. Therefore, research tool is one of the important components of the research which should pass all standardizations steps. Researchers in this research tried to evaluate the Persian version of nutritional literacy questionnaire and determine its reliability and validity for cultural adjustment. Nutritional literacy tool was confirmed by psychometric analysis to evaluate the nutritional literacy of the elderly. Validity is a degree of results' accuracy and shows that how correctly the study has measure what it intends to measure.[24] Face validity is the objective judgment about the structure of the tool and determines that if the scale is accepted by respondents.[25] Therefore, regarding the feedback of the elderly, required changes were made to make the questions more understandable.

Content validity study by expert is one of the best ways to gather evidence to support a tool.[26] Therefore, to determine content validity of a test, its effective factors should be determined by experts.[27] In quantitative content analysis, CVR and CVI were studied by 7 experts.

Regarding CVR higher than 0.99, and according to Lawshe table,[21] and accepting items based on CVI score higher than 0.79,[28] the questions had suitable content validity. Regarding the results of this step, 28 items were confirmed.

EFA was used to study the factor structure of NLS in elderly people of Iran. EFA is done by PCA to study the interconnectedness of variables and determine the classes with high connection.[29] Varimax rotation was used to determine the conformity and naming the extracted factors.[30] KMO and Bartlett tests were used to carry out factor analysis on data. KMO should be near to 1 to indicate the adequate sample size foe factor analysis.[31] Adequate sample size by KMO method in this study was 0.79. If this index is higher than 0.7, it indicates the suitable correlations in data for factor analysis. Bartlett test was used to confirm adequacy of the samples.[32] Results of the research showed the significant correlations among the items (χ2 = 1184.606, df = 378, P < 0.001). These results indicated adequate sample size and factor analysis. Extracted factors were 6 factors including nutritional literacy, healthy nutrition, calorie use, organic foods, saturated fats, and unit size which explain 43% of total variance.

Reliability is a degree of results' uniqueness during certain time and conditions with a similar method. Repeatability and reproduction of results were measured.[33] Constancy and internal consistency were evaluated to determine the reliability of tool. Test–retest was used to evaluate the tool constancy.[34] In this study, like other studies to test test-retest reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to be 0.92. Acceptable value for ICC is greater than 0.7,[35] Therefore, we can conclude that the tool has suitable reliability.

Internal consistency is one of the ways of methods to measure reliability which only needs one retest to provide an estimation of test reliability.[36] Internal consistency evaluation (Cronbach's alpha) of all questionnaire items showed the suitable correlations between different items by participants. Cronbach's alpha was 0.80 which is higher than 0.7.[37] This result is consistent with the results of Diamond study that NLS indicates an accepted internal adaptation with Cronbach's alpha of 0.84.[16]


  Conclusion Top


Regarding the importance of nutritional literacy effect in suitable decision-making and chronic diseases related to nutrition, it is necessary to confirm NLS validity and reliability. This study tried to determine the validity of the tool to provide suitable evidence to ensure the validity. Based on the results of validity and reliability evaluation, NLS has good reliability and validity in elderly people. This questionnaire was translated to Persian for the first time. The result of this study is a standard tool to evaluate the nutritional literacy evaluation among Persian speaking communities. On the other hand, completing this questionnaire by people in a short time is possible. Therefore, it can be used in the future research. Using this tool is recommended to health system policy-makers to study the nutritional literacy to improve health.

Limitations

  1. Given that the target group was the elderly, this study did not examine other age groups. Therefore, to generalize the results to other people, all age groups must participate in the study
  2. Concurrent, convergent, and divergent validity were not performed due to lack of standard and similar questionnaire.


Acknowledgment

Researcher would like to appreciate all professors in the health education and promotion department of Shahid Beheshti Medical Sciences University who have sincerely collaborated in this project and all elderly people who have helped in this research.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study is the result of research project with ethical code of IR.SBMU.PHNS.1396.85 from Shahid Beheshti Medical Sciences University.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
World Health Organization. Ageing. Available from: http://www.who.int/topics/ageing/en. [Last accessed on 2017 Apr20].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
World Health Organization. Ageing and Health. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs404/en. [Last accessed on 2017 Apr17].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
United Nations. World Population Ageing: 1950-2050. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/worldageing19502050. [Last accessed on 2017 Apr20].  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
World Health Organization. Noncommunicable Diseases Country Profiles; 2014. Available from: http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-profiles-2014/en. [Last accessed on 2017 Apr28].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Barry MM, D'Eath M, Sixsmith J. Interventions for improving population health literacy: Insights from a rapid review of the evidence. J Health Commun 2013; 18:1507-22.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Inoue M, Takahashi M, Kai I. Impact of communicative and critical health literacy on understanding of diabetes care and self-efficacy in diabetes management: A cross-sectional study of primary care in Japan. BMC Fam Pract 2013; 14:40.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Ford ES, Bergmann MM, Kröger J, Schienkiewitz A, Weikert C, Boeing H. Healthy living is the best revenge: Findings from the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition-potsdam study. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169:1355-62.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Eyles HC, Mhurchu CN. Does tailoring make a difference? A systematic review of the long-term effectiveness of tailored nutrition education for adults. Nutr Rev 2009; 67:464-80.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Knoops KT, de Groot LC, Kromhout D, Perrin AE, Moreiras-Varela O, Menotti A, et al. Mediterranean diet, lifestyle factors, and 10-year mortality in elderly european men and women: The HALE project. JAMA 2004; 292:1433-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Silk KJ, Sherry J, Winn B, Keesecker N, Horodynski MA, Sayir A. Increasing nutrition literacy: Testing the effectiveness of print, web site, and game modalities. J Nutr Educ Behav 2008; 40:3-10.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Carbone ET, Zoellner JM. Nutrition and health literacy: A systematic review to inform nutrition research and practice. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012; 112:254-65.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Guttersrud O, Dalane JØ, Pettersen S. Improving measurement in nutrition literacy research using rasch modelling: Examining construct validity of stage-specific 'critical nutrition literacy' scales. Public Health Nutr 2014; 17:877-83.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Vaitkeviciute R, Ball LE, Harris N. The relationship between food literacy and dietary intake in adolescents: A systematic review. Public Health Nutr 2015; 18:649-58.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Aihara Y, Minai J. Barriers and catalysts of nutrition literacy among elderly japanese people. Health Promot Int 2011; 26:421-31.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Zoellner J, Connell C, Bounds W, Crook L, Yadrick K. Nutrition literacy status and preferred nutrition communication channels among adults in the lower mississippi delta. Prev Chronic Dis 2009; 6:A128.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Diamond JJ. Development of a reliable and construct valid measure of nutritional literacy in adults. Nutr J 2007;6:5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Plichta SB, Kelvin EA, Munro BH. Munro's Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. Canada: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Patel P, Panaich S, Steinberg J, Zalawadiya S, Kumar A, Aranha A, et al. Use of nutrition literacy scale in elderly minority population. J Nutr Health Aging 2013; 17:894-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Taylor WL. Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journal Bull 1953; 30:415-33.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
World Health Organization. Process of Translation and Adaptation of Instruments. Available from: https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research./translation/en. [Last accessed on 2018 Nov8].  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity 1. Pers Psychol 1975;28:563-75.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Yaghmale F. Content validity and its estimation. J Med Educ 2003; 3:25-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Bryman A, Cramer D. Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for Windows: A guide for social scientists. USA and Canada: Routledge: 2002  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. Am J Med 2006; 119:166.e7-16.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Drost EA. Validity and reliability in social science research. Educ Res Perspect 2011; 38:105.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2006; 29:489-97.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research Methods in Education. USA: Routledge; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Munro BH. Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005. p. 105. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en &lr=& id=a34z_Ah2-LgC&oi=fnd&pg=PA5&dq=Munro+BH:+Statistical+Methods+for+Health+ Care+Research.+Philadelphia. [Last accessed on 2017 Nov 9].  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Pintrich PR, Smith DA, Garcia T, McKeachie WJ. Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educ Psychol Meas 1993; 53:801-13.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Hayton JC, Allen DG, Scarpello V. Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organ Res Methods 2004; 7:191-205.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Khaghanizade MP, Ebadi A. Review of translation and cultural adaptation process of questionnaires. Educ Strategies Med Sci 2009; 2:117-20.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Plichta SB, Kelvin EA, Munro BH. Munro's Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. Canada: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2013. p. 14-34.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P, Ernst DM, Hayden SJ, Lazzara DJ, et al. Apsychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh 2007; 39:155-64.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Webb NM, Shavelson RJ, Haertel EH. 4 Reliability Coefficients and Generalizability Theory. Handb Stat 2006; 26:81-124.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 1998; 17:101-10.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Gliem JA, Gliem RR, editors. Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach's Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-type Scales; 2003: Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1805/344.[Last accessed on 2017 Nov 11].  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Johnson R, Wichern D. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, NJ; 1998.  Back to cited text no. 37
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed222    
    Printed22    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded60    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal