Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 
Users Online: 778
Home Print this page Email this page

 



 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
J Edu Health Promot 2019,  8:248

Work-related musculoskeletal disorder among surgeons in Gujarat


Department of Physiotherapy, K M Patel Institute of Physiotherapy, Karamsad, Gujarat, India

Date of Submission18-Feb-2019
Date of Acceptance22-Aug-2019
Date of Web Publication31-Dec-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Jigar N Mehta
M Patel Institute of Physiotherapy, Karamsad, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_89_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

INTRODUCTION: Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms are a major health issue in many occupations all over the world. Past researches on hospital workers have mainly been focused on nurses, and not many studies have examined musculoskeletal symptoms among doctors in various specialties. The work of surgeons can involve high levels of mental concentration and very precise movements that can be categorized as mild-to-moderate physical demands.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence of musculoskeletal problems and their related physical and psychosocial factors of surgeons who are involved in such work.
METHODOLOGY: Forty-three surgeons were enrolled in this study. To evaluate the musculoskeletal disorders, the participants were assessed through Standardized Nordic Questionnaire, Quick Exposure Check for the work pattern, and Work style Short Form for screening purpose.
RESULTS: Out of 43 participants, 30 were male and 13 were female. Their mean age was 42.07 ± 12.35 years, and the mean working years ± standard deviation of the group was 15.14 years ± 9.017. On an average, they worked a total of about 8.58 h ± 1.96 per day. The prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms was found in 36 participants (83.70%), while only seven surgeons (16.30%) were symptom free.
CONCLUSION: The present study indicates a high prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons. The results also indicated that surgeons had a high sense of commitment and self-imposed pressure.

Keywords: Disability, musculoskeletal disorders, physical health, repetitive stress injury, surgeons


How to cite this article:
Vaghela N, Parekh S, Ganjiwale D, Mehta JN. Work-related musculoskeletal disorder among surgeons in Gujarat. J Edu Health Promot 2019;8:248

How to cite this URL:
Vaghela N, Parekh S, Ganjiwale D, Mehta JN. Work-related musculoskeletal disorder among surgeons in Gujarat. J Edu Health Promot [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Apr 10];8:248. Available from: http://www.jehp.net/text.asp?2019/8/1/248/274493


  Introduction Top


Symptoms with disorders are a major health issue in many occupations all over the world.[1] Extensive research has been conducted on these musculoskeletal problems in different occupational groups such as office workers, bus drivers, cleaners, and sewing machine operators.[2],[3],[4],[5] Among the health-care professions, extensive research has been done on nurses, nurse assistants, and patient care workers, with a focus on lifting and back pain.[6],[7]

Past researches on hospital workers have been mainly focused on nurses,[8] and there were studies examining musculoskeletal symptoms among doctors in various specialties. The work of surgeons has involved high levels of mental concentration and very precise movements that can be categorized as mild-to-moderate physical demands.[9]

They have to be extremely skillful with their hands as well as make important decisions quickly at critical moments during surgery. Other elements of their jobs include ward rounds, surgical meetings, patient consultations, and report-writing. It would be expected that surgeons are constantly exposed to both physical and psychosocial workplace demands, as they have to manage not only the physical work of performing surgery but also to communicate with both the patients and their families.

There is a general consensus among researchers that work-related musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders usually involve a multifactorial etiology, and psychosocial factors have a very major role in affecting these symptoms.[2],[10],[11] In an effort to integrate some of the psychosocial factors and concomitant physical factors, Feuerstein et al. proposed that the response of the worker in terms of “behavioral, cognitive, and physiological elements is triggered by the perceived or actual elevation in job demands to respond to the increases in work demands.“[12],[13] They proposed that not all workers react similarly to increases in perceived or real work demands and therefore the extent of the reaction has the potential to exacerbate and maintain symptoms, particularly in those who have a heightened reaction. This reaction which is dependent of a given work situation is referred to as the individual's “work style.”[14],[15] It was created to provide a measure that incorporates both physical and psychosocial dimensions of exposure in workers who perform intensive upper-limb work, such as office workers.[16],[17],[18] The questions the measure asks can be particularly relevant for professionals such as surgeons who may impose stress on themselves due to a high sense of responsibility and not providing small breaks to allow muscles to recover.

The present study aims to examine the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms among surgeons in Anand, Gujarat, India, and identify the prevalence of their musculoskeletal problems in relation to physical and psychosocial factors that may be involved in such work. The results can provide information about the magnitude of the problem, and the findings can be used to develop interventional strategies for surgeons.


  Methodology Top


This was a cross-sectional pilot study including 43 surgeons from in and around Anand city, Gujarat. Surgeons who were having prior spine or any other joint surgeries; inflammatory diseases; arthropathy except degenerative arthritis; malignancy; and a history of HIV, trauma, or fall in the past 6 months were excluded. Surgeons who were having gynecological conditions such as postpregnancy and who have undergone spinal anesthesia and any other medical or surgical conditions contributing to pain were also excluded from the study.

The study examined the self-report of musculoskeletal symptoms among surgeons from various specialties in Anand city. The surgeons were explained in detail about the project. Informed consent was taken from each surgeon, and the surgeons were requested to assist in the process of carrying out the project. Prior to commencing the study, ethical approval was sought for the study from the concerned committee. Each surgeon, participating in the project, was assessed maintaining full confidentiality. To collect the data, each surgeon was interviewed using the standardized Nordic Questionnaire which is a reliable tool to assess the musculoskeletal disorders; along with this, the researcher also collected information on psychological impact on musculoskeletal symptoms with Work Style short-form questionnaire. Ergonomic risk factors were also evaluated using Quick Exposure Checklist which asks the participants to consider whether the factors of posture, repetition, force, and environmental factors would contribute to their musculoskeletal problems.

Surgeon's behavior was also evaluated with the help of Work style Short Form;[13] ten questions were adopted in the present questionnaire and these questions are considered most relevant to reflect the influence of the behavioral factors involved in the reaction of the surgeons. For each question, the answers are in five categories, namely almost never (0); rarely (1); sometimes (2); frequently (3); and almost always (4).


  Results Top


A total of 43 surgeons comprising 30 males and 13 females completed the survey successfully. Their mean age was 42.07 years, and the mean working years of the group was 15.14 years. [Table 1]a On an average, they have a duty of work of about 8 h per day, and the main duties included operating and attending ward rounds and outpatient clinics. In terms of their own estimated working hours and types of duties performed, there appeared to be no difference between the genders. The present study reveals that among all the participants, 83.70% of surgeons were having musculoskeletal symptoms, whereas 16.30% of surgeons had no symptoms at all [Table 1]b.


Click here to view


Over 83.7% of the respondents reported experiencing at least one area of musculoskeletal symptoms in the past 12 months. The back region had the highest prevalence rate of 52.5% (n = 43), followed by the neck with 30.2%, shoulder 23.3%, knees and ankle 6.98%, elbow 2.32%, wrist 2.32%, and hip 2.32% [Table 2].
Table 2: Shows the jointwise prevalence of WMS among surgeons

Click here to view


As a part of the derived objectives' psychosocial factors, questions were adopted from the Work Style short form. These included questions that asked whether the respondent would work through pain, their social reactivity, and sense of responsibility and/or pressure and whether they would take breaks even when they are in pain. The results showed that 41.86% of surgeons responded that their schedule at work is very uncontrollable, 34.87% reported that “they don't have time to take a break because of everything that must get done,” 34.88% responded that they were physically exhausted by the end of the day, and 25% reported that “I put a lot of pressure on myself” [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6].
Table 3: Categorical distribution of surgeons based on joint wise QEC scoring

Click here to view
Table 4: Categorical distribution based on scoring of QEC for vibration, workpace, stress

Click here to view
Table 5: Comparison of prevalence based on Workstyle Shortform scorin

Click here to view
Table 6: Frequency distribution of surgeons based on total QEC score obtained

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The present study has examined work-related musculoskeletal problems in surgeons working in Anand. With increasing age and cumulative exposure to job stress, it would be expected that older surgeons may have a higher risk of developing musculoskeletal problems. Moreover, it has been reported in other studies that younger workers had higher prevalence rates of musculoskeletal problems due to their lack of experience, resulting in poorer job skills and insufficient practice.[19],[20],[21]

The frequency and duration of different surgical procedures performed may vary greatly from time to time and between different hospitals, and therefore it may not be easy to establish a direct relationship of these workload factors to the musculoskeletal problems. The prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms in our study is significantly high along with the exposure levels of ergonomic risk factors. Studies done by Hagberg[22] and Hildebrandt[23] had shown the relationship between musculoskeletal symptoms and physical workload. It can be noted here that musculoskeletal symptoms in head, neck, shoulder, and back are associated with occupations that are not necessarily heavy manual ones. The most likely reason for these symptoms in workers with physically light work can be attributed to the posture adopted during work. Static tension of neck and shoulder muscles has been addressed as causing tension neck syndrome which is a constant feeling of stiffness in the neck along with headache or neck pain.[24],[25] An established relationship has already been shown between nonneutral postures and back pain in several studies. Surgical procedures involve greater biomechanical stresses on the lumbar spine, contributing to higher symptom prevalence for this region. The surgeons may adopt more sustained lumbar flexion during these procedures while working on various anatomical regions, deeper internal organs, etc., for long hours. The risk of developing work-related musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons will be further increased due to the long hours of work and maintaining a static posture while performing movements of very fine eye–hand coordination.

The Work Style short form scores suggest that the cognitive, social, and biomechanical response of surgeons to increased work demands would place them at risk for developing musculoskeletal symptoms.

Hence, understanding the exposure levels of ergonomic risk factors and psychosocial factors is an important step toward finding effective solutions to these problems. Furthermore, it is proposed in previous studies on work style that it may be a factor for exacerbating musculoskeletal symptoms rather than causing the problems.[11],[15]

Limitations

This is a cross-sectional pilot study; hence, it is not known whether musculoskeletal symptoms are the cause or effect of the physical and psychological risk factors. A Self-reported problems by participants means subjectively mention the symptoms which could be limitation of study.

Future recommendations

Further studies can examine factors contributing to these problems more extensively and develop appropriate interventional strategies for the surgeons. The study can be carried out on surgeons in specific specialty branches. Further study can investigate the more precise physical demands of the different types of surgery and examine their relationships with musculoskeletal symptoms.


  Conclusion Top


The present survey has shown high prevalence rates of musculoskeletal symptoms of neck, back, and shoulders in surgeons. The results showed that physical risk factors involving constrained posture, repetitive movements, etc., were significant predictors of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons. The results also indicated that the surgeons had a high sense of commitment and self-imposed pressure.

Acknowledgement

We sincerely thanks to Dr. R. Harihara Prakash for their guidance and support during the study, we would also like to thank Megha Soni and Mittal Solanki for their help in literature search and data collection as well as the statistics department of our Institute to help us with the analysis of the study data and lastly we would like to extend our gratitude towards the HREC Committee for approving our research proposal and to all the participants for contributing in our study without them the study would not have been completed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Punnett L, Wegman DH. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: The epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2004;14:13-23.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Stoyneva ZB, Dermendjiev S, Dermendjiev T, Dobrev H. Work-related upper limb disorders: A case report. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2015;3:146-50.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Das B, Ghosh T. Assessment of ergonomical and occupational health related problems among VDT workers of West Bengal, India. Asian J Med Sci 2010;1:26-31.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Szeto GP, Lam P. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in urban bus drivers of Hong Kong. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:181-98.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Singh H, Singh LP. Effect of Occupational Factors on Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Insurance Office Employees: A Case Study. In Ergonomics in Caring for People 2018 (pp. 35-41). Springer, Singapore.   Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Engkvist IL, Kjellberg A, Wigaeus HE, Hagberg M, Menckel E, Ekenvall L. Back injuries among nursing personnel – Identification of work conditions with cluster analysis. Saf Sci 2001;37:118.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Fujishiro K, Weaver JL, Heaney CA, Hamrick CA, Marras WS. The effect of ergonomic interventions in healthcare facilities on musculoskeletal disorders. Am J Ind Med 2005;48:338-47.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Shannon HS, Woodward CA, Cunningham CE, McIntosh J, Lendrum B, Brown J, et al. Changes in general health and musculoskeletal outcomes in the workforce of a hospital undergoing rapid change: A longitudinal study. J Occup Health Psychol 2001;6:3-14.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Dabholkar TY, Yardi SS, Oak SN, Ramchandani S. Objective ergonomic risk assessment of wrist and spine with motion analysis technique during simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy in experienced and novice surgeons. J Minim Access Surg 2017;13:124-30.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Bongers PM, Kremer AM, ter Laak J. Are psychosocial factors, risk factors for symptoms and signs of the shoulder, elbow, or hand/wrist?: A review of the epidemiological literature. Am J Ind Med 2002;41:315-42.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Feuerstein M, Shaw WS, Nicholas RA, Huang GD. From confounders to suspected risk factors: Psychosocial factors and work-related upper extremity disorders. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2004;14:171-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Bruno Garza JL, Eijckelhof BH, Huysmans MA, Catalano PJ, Katz JN, Johnson PW, et al. The effect of over-commitment and reward on trapezius muscle activity and shoulder, head, neck, and torso postures during computer use in the field. Am J Ind Med 2013;56:1190-200.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Feuerstein M, Nicholas RA. Development of a short form of the workstyle measure. Occup Med (Lond) 2006;56:94-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Feuerstein M, Nicholas RA, Huang GD, Haufler AJ, Pransky G, Robertson M. Workstyle: Development of a measure of response to work in those with upper extremity pain. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15:87-104.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Feuerstein M, Nicholas RA, Huang GD, Dimberg L, Ali D, Rogers H. Job stress management and ergonomic intervention for work-related upper extremity symptoms. Appl Ergon 2004;35:565-74.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Das B. An evaluation of low back pain among female brick field workers of West Bengal, India. Environ Health Prev Med 2015;20:360-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Bernard BP, Putz-Anderson V. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors; a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. 1997  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Hagberg MB, Silverstein R, Wells R, Smith MJ, Hendrick HW, Carayon P, et al., editors. Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WORK RELATED MUSCULOSKELETAL SYMTOMSDs): A Reference Book for Prevention. London: Taylor & Francis; 1995.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Buckle P. Epidemiological aspects of back pain within the nursing profession. Int J Nurs Stud 1987;24:319-24.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Omenn GS, Morris SL. Occupational hazards to health care workers: Report of a conference. Am J Ind Med 1984;6:129-37.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Riihimäki H. Low-back pain, its origin and risk indicators. Scand J Work Environ Health 1991;17:81-90.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Hagberg M. Occupational musculoskeletal stress and disorders of the neck and shoulder: A review of possible pathophysiology. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1984;53:269-78.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Hildebrandt VH. A review of epidemiological research on risk factors of low back pain. In: Buckle PW, editor. Musculoskeletal Disorders. London: Taylor and Francis; 1987. p. 9-16.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Wauben LS, van Veelen MA, Gossot D, Goossens RH. Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: A questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1268-74.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Liberman AS, Shrier I, Gordon PH. Injuries sustained by colorectal surgeons performing colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1606-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed238    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded57    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal