Challenges of health promotion and education strategies to prevent cervical cancer in India: A systematic review
Jissa Vinoda Thulaseedharan1, Kirstin Grosse Frie2, Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan3
1 Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
2 Institute for Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
3 Research Triangle Institute Global India Private Limited (RTI International), New Delhi, 100 037, India; International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon CEDEX 08, France
|Date of Submission||18-Mar-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||13-Jul-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||29-Nov-2019|
Dr. Jissa Vinoda Thulaseedharan
Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Medical College PO, Trivandrum - 695 011, Kerala
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
BACKGROUND: Although there is a reduction in cervical cancer incidence over the years, it keeps the second position of the most common cancers among females in India. The aim of this review is to understand the challenges of health promotion and education strategies to prevent cervical cancer in India.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review is based on 78 studies published during 1993–2017 on the topics of awareness, attitude, and acceptance toward cervical cancer, screening, and human papilloma virus vaccination among Indians. The extracted information was summarized according to different populations such as people from different social and community groups, women and men attended clinics, students (nursing/medical/nonmedical), health-care providers (doctors, nurses, and other health workers), migrated Indians, and cervical cancer patients.
RESULTS: The awareness about cervical cancer and its prevention was very poor among women from different communities and the majority had a negative attitude toward screening and vaccination in general. The health professionals and medical students were more aware of cervical cancer and its prevention compared to the general population. Majority of students irrespective of medical or nonmedical background had a positive attitude toward vaccination. Only a small proportion of women in the general population were ever screened.
CONCLUSIONS: Observations from this review indicate immediate attention of the public health authority to take appropriate actions to educate and motivate general population toward cervical cancer prevention and to improve the facilities to incorporate the much needed preventive and early detection interventions in India.
Keywords: Cervical cancer, India, prevention and control
|How to cite this article:|
Thulaseedharan JV, Frie KG, Sankaranarayanan R. Challenges of health promotion and education strategies to prevent cervical cancer in India: A systematic review. J Edu Health Promot 2019;8:216
|How to cite this URL:|
Thulaseedharan JV, Frie KG, Sankaranarayanan R. Challenges of health promotion and education strategies to prevent cervical cancer in India: A systematic review. J Edu Health Promot [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 26];8:216. Available from: http://www.jehp.net/text.asp?2019/8/1/216/271911
| Introduction|| |
Cervical cancer is a long-term and rare outcome of persistent infection with one of the common oncogenic type human papillomavirus (HPV) infections. One or more of the symptoms such as vaginal discharge, sometimes foul-smelling, irregular bleeding, postcoital spotting or bleeding, and postmenopausal spotting or bleeding are the symptoms of early-stage cervical cancer followed by urinary frequency and urgency, backache, low abdominal pain, kidney failure, and even more severe symptoms in later stages.
Cervical cancer prevention includes primary, secondary, and tertiary level activities. Health education and vaccination against HPV infection are components of primary prevention, whereas secondary prevention focuses on early detection. Early diagnosis and screening are the two components of early detection. Early diagnosis helps to identify and treat at an early stage in symptomatic women when having a better prognosis, whereas screening identifies precancers in asymptomatic women before they progress to invasive cervical cancer. Diagnosis, management, and palliative care are part of tertiary prevention.
Globally, one out of every five incident cervical cancer patients is from India. The recent report of the global burden of disease study shows that cervical cancer incidence declined from the first position in 1990 to the third position in 2016 among all cancers in India and the Globocan 2018 shows that still, cervical cancer is in the second position of the most common cancers among women in India., Although there is a reduction, the incidence of cervical cancer in rural India is still high compared to other parts of India.,, In addition, the differences in quality and accessibility of health services make a wide variation in cervical cancer survival in India.,,
Quadrivalent and bivalent prophylactic HPV vaccines are licensed in India, but socio-cultural issues, high cost as well as the negative arguments precludes the implementation of HPV vaccination through the national immunization program in India., However, the states of Delhi and Punjab initiated routine vaccination of 12-year-old girls a few years back as part of their immunization program. The Pap smear, visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and HPV testing with opportunistic screening are available in India, particularly in urban areas, but the vast majority of women have never been screened in India. Tamil Nadu and Sikkim are the two states implemented cervical cancer screening through primary care services in India.
In this context, we reviewed to understand the challenges of health promotion and education strategies to prevent cervical cancer in India through the level of awareness, attitude, and acceptance toward cervical cancer prevention among different groups of people in India. We summarized the results of 78 studies to give a comprehensive overview about the level of awareness concerning cervical cancer and its prevention; attitude toward HPV infection, cervical cancer, HPV vaccination and screening; and the acceptance of vaccination, screening, and treatment among different population groups in India.
| Materials and Methods|| |
We aimed to identify all papers assessing awareness, attitude, and acceptance with regard to cervical cancer in India between 1980 and 2017, available in PubMed. With the research terms “NOT American Indian” in the strategy and using the following terminology ((((((acceptance) OR attitude) OR perception)OR knowledge) OR awareness) OR acceptability)OR acceptation) AND (cervical cancer OR HPV) AND (India OR Indian Not American Indian) AND (“1980/01/01”[Date-Publication]:”2017/12/31” [Date-Publication]), we identified 270 records. Further, we identified one additional record through Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and IndMED using the same strategy and 10 records using cross-references and Google searches.
The first and second author went through all abstracts and excluded the studies that were not dealing with the awareness and/or attitude and/or acceptance toward cervical cancer prevention. The articles those were dealing with the opinion of decision-makers, politicians, and/or committees; epidemiological studies on risk factors or survival; and studies dealing with the determinants of participation in cervical cancer screening demonstration projects were also excluded from the list. Overall, 77 papers and one dissertation were eligible for analysis and were listed in the order of publication years.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, The review process is explained in [Figure 1].
Both the first and second authors went through all the articles and prepared a database in excel sheet by extracting the basic information such as first author, publication year, title, study location, study methods, and details of participants [Appendix 1:Description of studies-Extracted information]. Of the 78 studies, only one study was published in 1993, 25 in 2001–2011,,,,,,,,, but 52 in the last 6 years (2012–2017).,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
The first author extracted information from the selected studies mainly under three headings such as awareness, attitude, and experience, in which awareness was assessed in 60, attitude in 50, and experience in 33 studies with overlapping of these three elements in many of the studies. This was further verified by the second author. The details of studies in separate sections are provided in [Table 1] with proper citations.
|Table 1: Summary of studies describing the information on awareness, attitude, and experience|
Click here to view
Description of study methods and participants
There were 64 quantitative studies and eight qualitative studies,,,,,,,, whereas six studies used both methods for collecting information.,,,,, Majority of the studies were cross-sectional surveys using interviews or questionnaires. Few studies were pre- and post-test evaluations,,,, one was a longitudinal study, and the remaining included qualitative interviews, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions.,,,,,,,,,,,,,
- The studies consist of different populations such as women and men from different community groups ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
- And attended clinics ,,,,,,,,,,
- Students (nursing/medical/paramedical/nonmedical),,,,,,,,,,,,,
- Health-care providers (doctors, nurses, and other health workers);,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, migrated Indians;,,,,,,,,,, and cervical cancer patients.
Some of the studies had more than one group of participants.,,,,,,, The results were compiled and presented according to the above categories of populations.
| Results|| |
Many sections included information from both quantitative and qualitative studies, and the extracted information did not have a unique nature to allow easy compilation. [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7] presents the summary of the information extracted from the studies those have some form of uniqueness to summarize. The other information is presented in the text in this section. The awareness regarding other risk factors of cervical cancer [Third column in the awareness section, [Table 1] was excluded from further analysis due to its extreme difficulty in compiling the diverse nature of assessment in different studies.
|Table 3: Awareness regarding cervical cancer screening and human papilloma virus vaccination|
Click here to view
|Table 4: Readiness to accept human papilloma virus vaccination and screening|
Click here to view
|Table 5: Perceptions on barriers and motivating factors to human papilloma virus vaccination|
Click here to view
The recognition of cervical cancer as a disease varied according to the population and location of studies. In general nurses and health professionals had a relatively higher level of awareness. The awareness about symptoms as well as HPV infection was also shown a similar pattern [Table 2].
Awareness about the Pap test is very minimal (3.5%–9.7%) among women in the community. Medical students had better knowledge about the Pap tests compared to nonmedical, nursing, and paramedical students, and more than 74% of nurses were aware of the Pap test as a screening tool for cervical cancer. In the community, majority of participants were unaware of the HPV vaccine. Moderate-to-good proportion of nursing or medical students were aware of the vaccine [Table 3], but they had low awareness regarding cost and type of vaccine. Among nurses and health-care providers, the awareness about HPV vaccination varied from 25% to 81% [Table 3].
One qualitative study in Uttar Pradesh reported that even those who heard about or ever had a Pap test or who came for screening were not aware of the purpose of the test, and also the providers had knowledge gaps about the preventive nature of cervical cancer. The same study also reported that many of the providers were aware of the link between HPV and cervical cancer. However, another multicentric study reported that health-care providers in India had a poor understanding of the etiology. In one study conducted in Mysore, parents of adolescents had very poor knowledge about HPV and its relation to cervical cancer. Two studies among migrated Indian women revealed that Indians were less aware about Pap test and its purpose than women from other origins., There was only one study among cervical cancer patients, and it was observed that women ignored the initial symptoms for a long time and did not think that those symptoms would turn as cancer in future. As per the results from a multicentric study, most Indian participants poorly understood about what a vaccine does. None of the parents participated in a study knew about the HPV vaccine, but several parents participated in another study read about the new HPV vaccine.
| Attitude|| |
About human papilloma virus infection or cervical cancer
Only 3% of the parents who participated in a study were willing to discuss cervical cancer with their young daughters, and 40% of them preferred to discuss these matters only when their daughters are over 19 years of age, followed by 34% who felt that it is only appropriate to discuss the matter with 15–18 years old girls. Migrated Indian women in Canada often spoke about Pap test and cervical cancer in terms of sexuality and mentioned the inappropriateness of discussing the topic in public. About 30% of women attending gynecology clinics believed cervical cancer is not as serious as other cancers, and 35% of the women perceived themselves to be not at risk. In the same study, one-third of the women believed that the disease can be easily cured and about 75% perceived that effective treatment is available. One study pointed out that many of the women diagnosed with cervical cancer feared disgrace, discrimination, guiltiness, and neglect by their husband and family. In another study, about 63% of the participants (healthy women attending family practice, obstetrics and gynecology clinics, and postnatal wards) revealed that they feel ashamed, embarrassed, guilty, scared, angry, or anxious if they had an HPV infection.
Readiness to accept human papilloma virus vaccination and willingness to screen
The information on vaccine acceptance and willingness to get screen is further summarized and provided in [Table 4]. More than 60% of students in all studies irrespective of medical or nonmedical background had a positive attitude toward the acceptance of HPV vaccination. Although the number of studies on health professionals and young men is very few, the participants of the available studies had a favorable attitude toward HPV vaccination. However, the vaccine acceptability by parents and women from different communities was low.
Even though a small proportion of women attended clinics were willing to be screened (14%–21%), the percentages of women in the community who have had a positive attitude toward screening varied from 33% to 95.5% in general [Table 4]. Female health professionals and nurses also had a favorable attitude toward screening. About 41% of nurses in a study reported that women should get Pap smears done only if they had symptoms  and 84% of nurses in another study reported that married women to be screened at least once in a lifetime. The study among migrated Indian women in the UK reported that they do not need smear test if they do not have symptoms (65%), they are not sexually active (39%) and if they are not at risk (22%).
The perceived barriers and motivating factors to HPV vaccination, and perceived barriers for screening were identified from the studies, and a summary is provided in [Table 5] and [Table 6].
Three papers had information on who is the final authority to take the decision on vaccinating their daughters. In one study, 61% of Indian women said that the decision whether to accept vaccination for their daughter would be taken by both parents together, 31% said they themselves, and 9% said their husband will take the decision. Others also noted the father's role as crucial in decision-making even though joint parental decision occurs.,
Three quantitative studies were found addressing acceptance or experience with HPV vaccination. The first study among pediatricians explored their practices by administering HPV vaccine to young girls. Among the participants, only 3.1% were routinely administering the vaccine, whereas 42.3% selectively and 46% were not at all administering HPV vaccine.
The second study explored the reasons for participation in HPV vaccination among parents or guardians of 9–14-year-old girls. Almost 65% of the respondents gave any of the following three reasons that are: it gives protection against cervical cancer, it prevents disease, or vaccines are good. The most-reported other reasons for participation was “followed others advice.” The major reason for partial or nonparticipation was “absent from school.” As per the third study, 6.8% of the medical or paramedical students were HPV vaccinated.
The ever participation in screening was ranging from 0% to 53% among different populations in India and from 34% to 87% among migrated Indian women [Table 7].
One study assessed the willingness of Anganwadi (a kind of government-run rural maternal and child health centers) workers to participate in screening before and after the intervention and found that 33% were ready to participate before the intervention, but it became 88% after the intervention. Another study reported that only 10% of the women who already had a Pap smear test came for follow-up visit. In a study on the concerns about self-sampling, about 63% of the participants said that self-sampling is easy, but 64% of women also reported that it hurts oneself.
Cost of services and transportation charges, not aware of the facility, lack of knowledge about screening, believed that test is not necessary, their doctors did not advise them to get Pap smear done, and embarrassment were the most common reasons for nonaccess to the health system or nonparticipation in screening reported by the five studies.,,,, Migrated Sikh women also reported that the difference in health system affects their health decisions and screening behaviors.
With diagnosis and treatment
One study in Tamil Nadu among VIA-positive women who refused cryotherapy described the reasons why they did not undergo cryotherapy. Scared of treatment, responsibility to look after their children, no symptoms and hence do not want treatment, and husband did not allow were the most common reasons for refusal to receive cryotherapy. In another study in Uttar Pradesh (including participants from public, private, and military sectors; clients, community members, policy advocates, and providers), worry about self-esteem while undergoing diagnosis and treatment was reported as one of the worst experiences. Lack of confidentiality and privacy to discuss with doctors in front of their son or close relatives were also reported as main barriers while undergoing diagnosis and treatment. A third study was done among cervical cancer survivors in Mumbai. Economic burden, social negligence, fear of remission, and fear of death were the most reported personal and emotional problems they faced during the time of treatment. The positive impact of attending devotional programs, yoga, and meditation practices were also highlighted.
| Discussion|| |
The present review suggests that the awareness about cervical cancer, its symptoms, HPV infection, and the preventive nature of the disease were better among medical students and health professionals than among other population groups, where the majority of the people in the community were unaware of all these things. The better awareness of medical students and health professionals is connected with their education and their acquaintance within hospital setup. Hence, the better awareness in such a population is expected. However, the lack of knowledge regarding cervical cancer and its prevention in the general population is well explored in this study and that needs to be addressed properly.
It is observed that women diagnosed with cervical cancer were afraid of disgrace, guiltiness, and neglect by their husband and family. Women also had similar concern if they were diagnosed with HPV infection. Many women perceived themselves to be not at risk  and also migrated women felt it inappropriate to discuss cervical cancer in public. These observations reveal that there is a stigma associated with cervical cancer, HPV infection, and sexual behavior. The studies on attitude about HPV vaccination also reveal the same stigma that vaccination would promote sexual promiscuity or premarital sexual intercourse because of the notion of “vaccination for a sexually transmitted infection.” The studies also suggest that even doctors and pediatricians had the stigma on how to introduce this vaccine to their clients. Even though the parents and women from different communities showed a negative attitude, >60% of the students in all reviewed studies had a positive attitude toward acceptance of vaccination, but they were feared of asking the cost of vaccine to their parents because of the above-mentioned reasons. However, the studies suggest that health worker recommendation and having part of the immunization schedule can motivate people to accept HPV vaccination. These results highlight that providing information and motivate medical doctors, especially pediatricians to administer HPV vaccines is crucial to improve acceptance among parents and to increase coverage rates.
The proportion of women who ever participated in screening was moderate to high in migrated Indian women,, but in the general population in India, it was very low with a slightly higher proportion among health professionals.,,,, It was also observed that an intervention can improve participation, but another study showed that the women coming for follow-up after screening was only 10%. The difference in screening participation between migrated women and the general population of women in India is a reflection of the difference between the two health systems where an organized cervical cancer screening is implemented in one place and such a program is not implemented in another place.
The lack of confidentiality and privacy were reported as major worries of women while attended screening. Furthermore, most often the husband or the head of the family is taking the decision on whether the women have to attend the screening. The personal and emotional problems associated with screening or the treatment of cervical cancer and the fear of social negligence among women is to be addressed and managed appropriately by the health system along with providing knowledge related to vaccination, screening, and the available facilities for screening in their nearby place.
Strength and limitations
The studies included in this review represent different populations from all over India and provides information regarding different groups of people in the population. However, the coverage of studies among migrated Indian women were limited to the hits we identified using our search criteria. We might have missed many studies among migrates Indian women. However, that may not affect the findings of this review since the major purpose was to understand the level of awareness, attitude, and acceptance toward cervical cancer prevention and to explore the challenges of health promotion and education strategies to prevent cervical cancer in India. To the best of our knowledge literature, on such studies are not available.
It was a major challenge to summarize the diverse information from different types of studies. For certain subthemes, the number of studies was very few to make a good summary, and also there were very few studies focusing specific populations, for example, studies done among cervical cancer patients or survivors. Furthermore, the extracted information under the subthemes did not always show a unique pattern, may be due to local or regional differences and differences in study design and methods. Furthermore, many things were unanswered for instance, the attitude of health-care providers and the community toward women attended screening, and/or women diagnosed with HPV infection, cervical precursor, or cancer. Furthermore, the search may not cover all studies conducted in the field, especially the studies published in nonindexed journals. However, to a certain extent, the reviewed studies helped to explore the objectives reasonably.
| Conclusions|| |
From a public health perspective, the low level of awareness and negative attitude toward cervical cancer prevention in the population underscores the need for intensive efforts by the public health services in improving awareness and implement interventions aiming at the eventual elimination of this most preventable cancer. Effective cervical cancer prevention in India will substantially contributes to a notable reduction in the global burden of cervical cancer. It is very important to educate the general population about cervical cancer, its risk factors, and preventive measures in such a way that it should reduce the psychosocial barriers and misconceptions about cervical cancer and its prevention. The misconception like screening is not required in the absence of any symptoms and it is required only for women who have many sexual partners, have to be addressed adequately in the community. The role of socioeconomic status in the pathway of cervical cancer progression also should be considered while implementing educational programs. The women should be empowered to find resources and take decisions to access health care for them. If more and more people are aware of cervical cancer, then people would search for preventive measures and facilities for early detection. This will result in increasing demand for preventive measures that in turn will force the public health system to increase and improve the facilities for prevention and early detection. The possibility of potential elimination of cervical cancer is a powerful concept that can drive investments for effective cervical cancer prevention in public health services.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Bosch FX, Muñoz N. The viral etiology of cervical cancer. Virus Res 2002;89:183-90.
World Health Organization. Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control – A Guide to Essential Practice. 2nd
ed. Switzerland: WHO Press; 2014. p. 38-44.
Miller AB. Epidemiologic Studies in Cancer Prevention and Screening. 1st
ed. New York: Springer; 2013.
Sankaranarayanan R, Nessa A, Esmy PO, Dangou JM. Visual inspection methods for cervical cancer prevention. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2012;26:221-32.
India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Cancer Collaborators. The burden of cancers and their variations across the states of India: The global burden of disease study 1990-2016. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:1289-306.
Yeole BB. Trends in cancer incidence in female breast, cervix uteri, corpus uteri, and ovary in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2008;9:119-22.
Nandakumar A, Ramnath T, Chaturvedi M. The magnitude of cancer cervix in India. Indian J Med Res 2009;130:219-21.
] [Full text]
Badwe RA, Dikshit R, Laversanne M, Bray F. Cancer incidence trends in India. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2014;44:401-7.
Sankaranarayanan R, Swaminathan R, Brenner H, Chen K, Chia KS, Chen JG, et al.
Cancer survival in Africa, Asia, and central America: A population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:165-73.
Thulaseedharan JV, Malila N, Swaminathan R, Esmy PO, Cherian M, Muwonge R, et al.
Survival of patients with cervix cancer in rural India. Clin Gynecol Obstet 2015;4:290-6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jcgo367w
. [Last accessed on 2018 Jun 20].
Jayant K, Sankaranarayanan R, Thorat RV, Muwonge R, Hingmire SJ, Panse NS, et al.
Improved survival of cervical cancer patients in a screened population in rural India Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016;17:4837-44.
Nigam A, Saxena P, Acharya AS, Mishra A, Batra S. HPV vaccination in India: Critical appraisal. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2014; vol. 2014, Article ID 394595. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/394595
.[Last accessed on 2018 Jun 20].
Sankaranarayanan R, Bhatla N, Gravitt PE, Basu P, Esmy PO, Ashrafunnessa KS, et al.
Human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer prevention in India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Nepal. Vaccine 2008;26 Suppl 12:M43-52.
Thulaseedharan JV. Evaluation of Sociodemographic, Reproductive and Screening-related Factors on Risk of and Survival from Cervical Cancer in Rural South India. Dissertation. Tampere: Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis 1764; 2017. Available from: http://tampub.uta.fi
. [Last accessed on 2017 Jul 22].
Sullivan R, Badwe RA, Rath GK, Pramesh CS, Shanta V, Digumarti R, et al.
Cancer research in India: National priorities, global results. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:e213-22.
Dhamija S, Sehgal A, Luthra UK, Sehgal K. Factors associated with awareness and knowledge of cervical cancer in a community: Implication for health education programmes in developing countries. J R Soc Health 1993;113:184-6.
Pai M, Pai N, Bilal S, Ashok M, Radhika P. Cervical cancer screening: Is it a priority among nurses? Natl Med J India 2001;14:59-60.
McCaffery K, Forrest S, Waller J, Desai M, Szarewski A, Wardle J. Attitudes towards HPV testing: A qualitative study of beliefs among Indian, Pakistani, African-Caribbean and White British women in the UK. Br J Cancer 2003;88:42-6.
Desai M. An assessment of community based cancer screening program among Indian women using the anganwadi workers. J Obstet Gynecol India 2004;54:483-7.
Forrest S, McCaffery K, Waller J, Desai M, Szarewski A, Cadman L, et al.
Attitudes to self-sampling for HPV among Indian, Pakistani, African-Caribbean and white British women in Manchester, UK. J Med Screen 2004;11:85-8.
Dabash R, Vajpayee J, Jacob M, Dzuba I, Lal N, Bradley J, et al.
A strategic assessment of cervical cancer prevention and treatment services in 3 districts of Uttar Pradesh, India. Reprod Health 2005;2:11.
Ramanakumar AV, Balakrishna Y, Ramarao G. Coping mechanisms among long-term survivors of breast and cervical cancers in Mumbai, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2005;6:189-94.
Aswathy S, Sumithra S, Valsala LS, Sandheep S, Lohidas V, Shobha P, et al.
Self reported morbidity and awareness regarding common cancers in elderly women. J Commun Dis 2006;38:106-11.
Basu P, Ghoshal M, Chattopadhyay K, Mittal S, Das P, Choudhury D, et al.
Cervical screening by visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) is well accepted by women – Results from a community-based study in rural India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2006;7:604-8.
Oelke ND, Vollman AR. “Inside and outside”: Sikh women's perspectives on cervical cancer screening. Can J Nurs Res 2007;39:174-89.
Brotto LA, Chou AY, Singh T, Woo JST. Reproductive health practices among Indian, Indo-Canadian, Canadian East Asian, and Euro-Canadian women: The role of acculturation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008;30:229-38.
Ross JS, Nuñez-Smith M, Forsyth BA, Rosenbaum JR. Racial and ethnic differences in personal cervical cancer screening amongst post-graduate physicians: Results from a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health 2008;8:378.
Roy B, Tang TS. Cervical cancer screening in Kolkata, India: Beliefs and predictors of cervical cancer screening among women attending a women's health clinic in Kolkata, India. J Cancer Educ 2008;23:253-9.
Wong LP. Young multiethnic women's attitudes toward the HPV vaccine and HPV vaccination. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008;103:131-5.
Bingham A, Drake JK, LaMontagne DS. Sociocultural issues in the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccine in low-resource settings. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:455-61.
Madhivanan P, Krupp K, Yashodha MN, Marlow L, Klausner JD, Reingold AL. Attitudes toward HPV vaccination among parents of adolescent girls in Mysore, India. Vaccine 2009;27:5203-8.
Marlow LA, Wardle J, Forster AS, Waller J. Ethnic differences in human papillomavirus awareness and vaccine acceptability. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009;63:1010-5.
Dunn RA, Tan AK. Cervical cancer screening in Malaysia: Are targeted interventions necessary? Soc Sci Med 2010;71:1089-93.
Jayant K, Nene BM, Badwe RA, Panse NS, Thorat RV, Khan FY. Rural cancer registry at Barshi, Maharashtra and its impact on cancer control. Natl Med J India 2010;23:274-7.
Krupp K, Marlow LA, Kielmann K, Doddaiah N, Mysore S, Reingold AL, et al.
Factors associated with intention-to-recommend human papillomavirus vaccination among physicians in Mysore, India. J Adolesc Health 2010;46:379-84.
Robb K, Wardle J, Stubbings S, Ramirez A, Austoker J, Macleod U, et al.
Ethnic disparities in knowledge of cancer screening programmes in the UK. J Med Screen 2010;17:125-31.
Saha A, Chaudhury AN, Bhowmik P, Chatterjee R. Awareness of cervical cancer among female students of premier colleges in Kolkata, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2010;11:1085-90.
Basu P, Mittal S. Acceptability of human papillomavirus vaccine among the urban, affluent and educated parents of young girls residing in Kolkata, Eastern India. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2011;37:393-401.
Joy T, Sathian B, Bhattarai C, Chacko J. Awareness of cervix cancer risk factors in educated youth: A cross-sectional, questionnaire based survey in India, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011;12:1707-12.
LaMontagne DS, Barge S, Le NT, Mugisha E, Penny ME, Gandhi S, et al
. Human papillomavirus vaccine delivery strategies that achieved high coverage in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ 2011;89:821B-30B.
Tiwari A, Kishore J, Tiwari A. Perceptions and concerns of women undergoing pap smear examination in a tertiary care hospital of India. Indian J Cancer 2011;48:477-82.
] [Full text]
Aswathy S, Quereshi MA, Kurian B, Leelamoni K. Cervical cancer screening: Current knowledge and practice among women in a rural population of Kerala, India. Indian J Med Res 2012;136:205-10.
] [Full text]
Beining RM. Screening for Cervical Cancer: an Exploratory Study of Urban Women in Tamil Nadu, India. Dissertation. Iowa: University of Iowa; 2012. Available from: http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/2820
.[Last accessed on 2018 Jan 5].
Donta B, Begum S, Nair S, Naik DD, Mali BN, Bandiwadekar A. Awareness of cervical cancer among couples in a slum area of Mumbai. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012;13:4901-3.
Hussain S, Bharadwaj M, Nasare V, Kumari M, Sharma S, Hedau S, et al.
Human papillomavirus infection among young adolescents in India: Impact of vaccination. J Med Virol 2012;84:298-305.
Isaac R, Finkel M, Olver I, Annie IK, Prashanth HR, Subhashini J, et al.
Translating evidence into practice in low resource settings: Cervical cancer screening tests are only part of the solution in rural India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012;13:4169-72.
Naing C, Pereira J, Abe T, Eh Zhen Wei D, Rahman Bajera IB, Kavinda Perera UH. Predictors associated with the willingness to take human papilloma virus vaccination. J Community Health 2012;37:288-93.
Pandey D, Vanya V, Bhagat S, Vs B, Shetty J. Awareness and attitude towards human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine among medical students in a premier medical school in India. PLoS One 2012;7:e40619.
Raychaudhuri S, Mandal S. Current status of knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) and screening for cervical cancer in countries at different levels of development. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012;13:4221-7.
Castillino RB, Raddi SA, Dalal A. Assessment of knowledge and perceived barriers to prevention of cervical cancer among women attending gynecology OPD at KLE's Dr. Prabhakar core hospital and medical research centre, Belgaum, Karnataka with a view to develop an information booklet. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2012;4:169-71. Availablefrom: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5d12/5b40c6b9f7f59c601fb40980ddb2f2b6f38d.pdf
. [Last accessed on 2019 Jun 20].
Shah V, Vyas S, Singh A, Shrivastava M. Awareness and knowledge of cervical cancer and its prevention among the nursing staff of a tertiary health institute in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. Ecancermedicalscience 2012;6:270.
Singh E, Seth S, Rani V, Srivastava DK. Awareness of cervical cancer screening among nursing staff in a tertiary institution of rural India. J Gynecol Oncol 2012;23:141-6.
Gargano LM, Thacker N, Choudhury P, Weiss PS, Russ RM, Pazol K, et al.
Pediatricians' perceptions of vaccine effectiveness and safety are significant predictors of vaccine administration in India. Int Health 2013;5:205-10.
Goyal A, Vaishnav G, Shrivastava A, Verma R, Modi A. Knowledge, attitude and practices about cervical cancer and screening among nursing staff in a teaching hospital. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2013;2:249-53.
Mehta S, Rajaram S, Goel G, Goel N. Awareness about human papilloma virus and its vaccine among medical students. Indian J Community Med 2013;38:92-4.
] [Full text]
Pandey S, Chandravati. Human papillomavirus-mediated cervical cancer awareness and Gardasil vaccination: A pilot survey among North Indian women. J Community Health 2013;38:907-10.
Ramavath KK, Olyai R. Knowledge and awareness of HPV infection and vaccination among urban adolescents in India: A cross-sectional study. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2013;63:399-404.
Sharma R, Bhasin SK, Agrawal S, Tewari R. Cancer related knowledge and behavior among women across various socio-economic strata: A study from Delhi, India. South Asian J Cancer 2013;2:66-9.
] [Full text]
Shekhar S, Sharma C, Thakur S, Raina N. Cervical cancer screening: Knowledge, attitude and practices among nursing staff in a tertiary level teaching institution of rural India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013;14:3641-5.
Thippeveeranna C, Mohan SS, Singh LR, Singh NN. Knowledge, attitude and practice of the pap smear as a screening procedure among nurses in a tertiary hospital in North Eastern India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013;14:849-52.
Vikrant CS, Ghongne BB. Knowledge and awareness of human papilloma virus (HPV), cervical cancer and HPV Vaccines among medical students. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 2013;4:205-17. Available from: https://ijpbs.net/archive-issue.php?issueid=24
. [Last accessed on 2019 Jun 29].
Vineetha J, Malathi GN, Preethy J. Attitude on human papilloma virus vaccination. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 2013;2:90-5. Available from: https://www.ijcmas.com/Archives-12.php
. [Last accessed on 2019 Jun 29].
Bansil P, Wittet S, Lim JL, Winkler JL, Paul P, Jeronimo J. Acceptability of self-collection sampling for HPV-DNA testing in low-resource settings: A mixed methods approach. BMC Public Health 2014;14:596.
Belani HK, Sekar P, Guhaniyogi R, Abraham A, Bohjanen PR, Bohjanen K. Human papillomavirus vaccine acceptance among young men in Bangalore, India. Int J Dermatol 2014;53:e486-91.
Harsha Kumar H, Tanya S. A study on knowledge and screening for cervical cancer among women in Mangalore city. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2014;4:751-6.
Hussain S, Nasare V, Kumari M, Sharma S, Khan MA, Das BC, et al.
Perception of human papillomavirus infection, cervical cancer and HPV vaccination in North Indian population. PLoS One 2014;9:e112861.
Madhivanan P, Srinivas V, Marlow L, Mukherjee S, Narayanappa D, Mysore S, et al.
Indian parents prefer vaccinating their daughters against HPV at older ages. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:107-10.
Mary B, D'Sa JL. Evaluation of an educational program on cervical cancer for rural women in Mangalore, Southern India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:6603-8.
Montgomery MP, Dune T, Shetty PK, Shetty AK. Knowledge and acceptability of human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening among women in Karnataka, India. J Cancer Educ 2015;30:130-7.
Paul P, Tanner AE, Gravitt PE, Vijayaraghavan K, Shah KV, Zimet GD, et al.
Acceptability of HPV vaccine implementation among parents in India. Health Care Women Int 2014;35:1148-61.
Pengpid S, Peltzer K. Attitudes and practice of cervical cancer screening among female university students from 25 low, middle income and emerging economy countries. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:7235-9.
Siddharthar J, Rajkumar B, Deivasigamani K. Knowledge, awareness and prevention of cervical cancer among women attending a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, India. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:OC01-3.
Singh M, Ranjan R, Das B, Gupta K. Knowledge, attitude and practice of cervical cancer screening in women visiting a tertiary care hospital of Delhi. Indian J Cancer 2014;51:319-23.
] [Full text]
Swapnajaswanth M, Suman G, Suryanarayana SP, Murthy NS. Perception and practices on screening and vaccination for carcinoma cervix among female healthcare professional in tertiary care hospitals in Bangalore, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:6095-8.
Tripathi N, Kadam YR, Dhobale RV, Gore AD. Barriers for early detection of cancer amongst Indian rural women. South Asian J Cancer 2014;3:122-7.
] [Full text]
Khanna N, Ramaseshan A, Arnold S, Panigrahi K, Macek MD, Padhi BK, et al.
Community awareness of HPV screening and vaccination in Odisha. Obstet Gynecol Int 2015;2015:694560.
Swarnapriya K, Kavitha D, Reddy GM. Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding HPV vaccination among medical and Para medical in students, India a cross sectional study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:8473-7.
Bansal AB, Pakhare AP, Kapoor N, Mehrotra R, Kokane AM. Knowledge, attitude, and practices related to cervical cancer among adult women: A hospital-based cross-sectional study. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2015;6:324-8.
Doshi D, Reddy BS, Karunakar P, Deshpande K. HPV, cervical cancer and pap test related knowledge among a sample of female dental students in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:5415-20.
Marlow LA, Wardle J, Waller J. Understanding cervical screening non-attendance among ethnic minority women in England. Br J Cancer 2015;113:833-9.
Sabeena S, Bhat PV, Kamath V, Aswathyraj S, Arunkumar G. Knowledge, attitude and practice concerning human papilloma virus infection and its health effects among rural women, Karnataka, South India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:5053-8.
Shankar A, Rath G, Roy S, Malik A, Bhandari R, Kishor K, et al.
Level of awareness of cervical and breast cancer risk factors and safe practices among college teachers of different states in India: Do awareness programmes have an impact on adoption of safe practices? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:927-32.
Marlow LA, Waller J, Wardle J. Barriers to cervical cancer screening among ethnic minority women: A qualitative study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2015;41:248-54.
Chawla PC, Chawla A, Chaudhary S. Knowledge, attitude and practice on human papillomavirus vaccination: A cross-sectional study among healthcare providers. Indian J Med Res 2016;144:741-9.
] [Full text]
Rashid S, Labani S, Das BC. Knowledge, awareness and attitude on HPV, HPV vaccine and cervical cancer among the college students in India. PLoS One 2016;11:e0166713.
Jain N, Halder A, Mehrotra R. A mixed method research to identify perceived reasons and solutions for low uptake of cervical cancer screening in urban families of Bhopal region. Scientifica (Cairo) 2016;2016:5731627.
Jain SM, Bagde MN, Bagde ND. Awareness of cervical cancer and pap smear among nursing staff at a rural tertiary care hospital in central India. Indian J Cancer 2016;53:63-6.
] [Full text]
Patra S, Upadhyay M, Chhabra P. Awareness of cervical cancer and willingness to participate in screening program: Public health policy implications. J Cancer Res Ther 2017;13:318-23.
Veerakumar AM, Kar SS. Awareness and perceptions regarding common cancers among adult population in a rural area of Puducherry, India. J Educ Health Promot 2017;6:38.
Canon C, Effoe V, Shetty V, Shetty AK. Knowledge and attitudes towards human papillomavirus (HPV) among academic and community physicians in Mangalore, India. J Cancer Educ 2017;32:382-91.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7]