Designing a safety management system for higher education centers
Alireza Jabbari1, Elahe Khorasani2, Hori Asgari1, Raja Mardani1, Yasamin Molavi Taleghani1
1 Health Management and Economics Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, School of Pharmacy, Students Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
|Date of Submission||06-Feb-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||27-Apr-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||30-Aug-2019|
Dr. Yasamin Molavi Taleghani
Hezar Jarib Street, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Management and Informatics Medical University, Isfahan
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
INTRODUCTION: The system of safety management in higher education centers can prevent the complications caused by harmful issues to students and bring their potential talents closer to perfection. Therefore, this study aimed to design a safety management system (SMS) in higher education centers of Iran in 2016.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a descriptive study of qualitative type. This study was conducted in three independent phases, including (1) evaluating theoretical concepts, (2) developing an initial system by determining the points of sharing and differentiation of the evaluated systems, and (3) validating the SMS using the Delphi technique. Consensus on opinions and identifying similarities and differences of reviewed studies have been used for qualitative data analysis, and the descriptive statistics (sum of scores and mean) by means of SPSS version 21 has been used for quantitative data analysis.
RESULTS: In the first stage, 108 indexes were identified by reviewing the studies and evaluating the SMS in the world's educational and noneducational organizations for the 12 main categories of SMS. In the Delphi phase, 83 components were identified as a key index of the SMS in higher education centers of Iran. Furthermore, the average mean of participants' views on the dimensions of the SMS for higher education centers has been 4.32, with the highest average mean of 4.59 related to the dimension of the facility and the firefighting department and the lowest mean of 4.10 for the student dimension.
CONCLUSION: The indexes presented in this study will provide a fairly complete tool for designing SMS in higher education centers, which by applying it will provide a good opportunity to improve the performance of these systems over time.
Keywords: Higher education centers, safety management, system
|How to cite this article:|
Jabbari A, Khorasani E, Asgari H, Mardani R, Taleghani YM. Designing a safety management system for higher education centers. J Edu Health Promot 2019;8:154
|How to cite this URL:|
Jabbari A, Khorasani E, Asgari H, Mardani R, Taleghani YM. Designing a safety management system for higher education centers. J Edu Health Promot [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 28];8:154. Available from: http://www.jehp.net/text.asp?2019/8/1/154/265854
| Introduction|| |
The structure of the school or university, the quality of education, and the combination of educational and noneducational staff, along with the complex environment of the educational centers, create conditions that are important for the search and evaluate the status of safety to improve and extend the situations and opportunities for the educational process. Therefore, the educational safety and continuity in schools and universities require a continuous and dynamic process initiated by the management and the involved staff, students, parents, and the local community.
Every year, many educational centers suffer from disasters and a significant number of students and staff members of these centers are victims of disasters. In a report, which was conducted using the data collected from the Marsh's Higher Mental Health Risk Management study, uncertainty in finances, competition among students, international registration, population, and deficiencies in the perception of risk and safety management programs were expressed as key issues of safety management programs at higher education centers. Furthermore, in the usage guide of risk management at the University of London, withdrawal from the budget, collapse of key markets which lead to significant loss of earnings, college dissatisfaction with customer service and college missions, inability to manage dormitories (power outages, firefighting, etc.), and damage to university reputation by negative media coverage were mentioned as the dangers of university and higher education centers. Therefore, it is necessary to have a specific structure of safety management for preventing disasters and coping with risks, taking into account the health and safety of staff, customers, and other stakeholders in higher education centers or schools.
Safety management is the process of identifying, analyzing, and forecasting risks that are considered a threat or risk for organizations. Therefore, safety management is an organized attitude to risk management in an organization. Following the systematic methods in safety management can guide the organization to reach the causes of disasters in a logical way and direct them away from pursuing an unstructured approach based on mental and tact thoughts that lead to waste of time. Moreover, safety management system (SMS) can assess the risks and present strategies to reduce and prevent them. This can also provide preparedness actions to cope with the risks. On the other hand, enjoying a pattern of structural and specified SMS which follows legal obligations can provide a safe workplace for all workers, students, and visitors.
In general, safety management is an integral part of the activities of excellent training centers, in addition to taking advantage of it and avoiding many disasters, to prevent injury to financial resources and equipment of the organization, and consequently creating dissatisfaction. In recent years, the UK Higher Education Budget Council required that all universities implement safety management as a governmental tool to increase productivity in decision-making. The SMS in the higher education sector can include different sections, each of which has its own indexes. However, except big universities (with >15,000 full-time enrollments), which are relatively advanced in their safety management programs, many centers, such as higher education centers in Iran, are in the early stages of maturity in safety management.
According to the presented articles, having an acceptable SMS in higher education centers can prevent the complications caused by harmful issues to students and can bring their potential talents closer to perfection; this study has been conducted with the aim of designing the SMS for higher education centers in Iran in 2016. In this research, the meaning of safety management refers to those dimensions and indexes that the incidence of errors is controlled and limited.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The present study is a qualitative descriptive study that used reviewing different systems and Delphi method to design an SMS for higher education centers.
This study was conducted in three main phases:
First phase, study phase
In this phase, all of the world's educational and noneducational organizations that had been provided a system for safety and risk management as well as all reports, articles, and related studies were evaluated.
Official websites, articles, reports, guidelines, and authoritative guidance of worldwide were used for collecting search data. In addition, the English databases available at the Iranian National Digital Medicine Library (Web of Knowledge, PubMed, Springer, Google Scholar, Cochran, Elsevier) the Persian (SID database), and Magiran (and Google) were used to find articles and studies published electronically and without time limitations. Search using Persian and english keywords such as “safety, risk, safety and risk management, educational centers, university and higher education” was done separately or a combination with Boolean functions, as well as a list of references published has been conducted to increase sensitivity and select more studies.
The search assessment was done by one of the researchers randomly to evaluate the non-deletion of the studies. Finally, related articles were selected and acted to remove nonrelated items. After determining the related studies, the assessment of the quality of the studies was evaluated through authors' agreement using the evaluating observation and avoiding errors by observing standards criteria and extracting information by researchers based on the title, type of text, authors, year, country, study purpose, title of safety or risk model, dimensions and indexes of safety and risk management, and level and location of model implementation.
The criteria for the entry of studies and reports in this phase were related to safety and risk management and the presentation of dimensions or system for safety and risk assessment. Furthermore, the exit criteria of the studies included cases that have merely described the importance of safety and risk management and had been not provided any specific indexes or criteria.
Second phase, formation of the primary model
In this phase, by determining the points of sharing and differentiation of the safety and risk management indexes extracted in the first phase, a preliminary draft was designed to determine the components of safety management in the educational centers of Iran by the authors. The prepared draft was also criticized and agreed by the research authors and three experts in the area of safety and risk management (one person at the Department of Health in Disasters, one assistant professor of disaster, and one Ph.D. in Health Services Management).
Third phase, pattern validation
The third phase was final pattern presentation of safety management and validation of this pattern by the Delphi method. All experts in the fields of educational management, risk, and safety management were research population in this phase. Sampling was targeted in the field of expertise and was used by those who had the expertise and experience required in this field. In this phase, the input criteria of the study include at least one of the following: (1) having related researches in safety and risk management or membership at specialized risk and safety committees and (2) having a work experience in related organizations with the issue of safety and risk or having work experience in higher education centers.
Participants in two rounds were rated each of the subdimension under study using a researcher-made questionnaire on the 5-point Likert scale (very low value = 1, low value = 2, average value = 3, high value = 4, very high value = 5). The number of participants included 20 people of experts. Three follow-ups were conducted to increase the response rate to a questionnaire by one of the researchers.
The scores obtained in the questionnaire were entered into the SPSS software version 21. It was acquired by International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) in Armonk, New York. In the first round, indexes were removed with a score of <50% and also indexes were accepted with a score of over 50%. Furthermore, indexes with a score of 50%–75% were considered in the second round questionnaire after the proposed modifications proposed by the study group. After redistributing and recollecting questionnaires, the indexes that were scored over 80% were suggested as final indexes for entering the final pattern.
In other words, those components were considered as the key component to enter the final pattern by consulting 15 scholars, and 12 of them indicated these components as very important.
The determination of face validity was done through reviewing the texts, the consensus of the authors' comments and the three experts mentioned in the second phase of the research, and the cases of difficulty level (difficulty in understanding the words and phrases and the probability of misunderstandings of phrases or insufficiency of words meanings).
Measuring the content validity quantitatively using content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI). The content validity shows that to what extent the questions introduce the content and its objective with the topic.
| Results|| |
In the first phase, 4708 related articles or reports were obtained after searching for various sources. After evaluating repeated cases and after evaluating their title and summary, 178 items were selected for the study of complete text; of 178 cases, 32 items were selected for the subject field to extract information.
In the second phase, the sharing points and differentiation of the studied studies in the first phase are determined and its results are presented in [Table 1].
Overall, 108 key indexes in terms of 12 subject areas are determined based on [Table 1] results and the consensus of the authors' views and three experts in the field of safety and risk management field.
In the Delphi stage, experts' opinions were gathered through a questionnaire to prioritize and determine the validity of 108 components identified. A total of 15 out of the 20 invited experts participated in the Delphi study, consisting of 5 (33.3%) males and 10 (66.7%) females. Furthermore, 46.7% of the participants were aged between 30 and 40 years, 6.7% had no teaching experience, and 40% had a degree in health care management. In addition, the average response time for participants in the Delphi phase has been 8 days (1–15 days). The results of this phase are presented in [Table 2] by the 12 main dimensions of safety management indexes in higher education centers.
|Table 2: Frequency distribution of participants on indexes of safety management pattern in higher education centers|
Click here to view
Based on [Table 2], the average mean of participants' views on dimensions of the SMS in higher education centers in Iran has been equal to 4.32, with the highest mean of 4.59 for the dimension of the facilities and the fire department and the lowest mean of 4.10 for the student dimension.
Finally, the components reaching 80% score at Delphi phase in the eye of interviewees are recognized as the key indexes for the framework of safety management at the higher education institutes. Accordingly, 25 items were omitted out of 108 primary items. By calculating the remaining items, content validity index and content validity ratio mean of total questionnaire was accounted as 0.90 and 0.81, respectively [Figure 1]. It is worth noting that the remaining components in the final pattern of safety management are in gray in [Table 2].
| Discussion|| |
Education is a human right, universal, and certain. In particular, education is important in enabling people to reach their full potential and achieve other important rights. School safety and educational continuing require a continuous and dynamic process initiated by management and staff involved students, parents, and the local community. Hence, considering the importance of reducing the vulnerability of universities, due to the availability of human, scientific, documentary, and equipment assets, it is imperative to develop a safety management program. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of studying the design of SMS of higher education centers in Iran in 2016.
In the review phase of text, after reviewing the studies and evaluating SMSs in educational and non-educational organizations in the world, 108 indexes were obtained based on 12 classes. In general, extensive studies have been conducted in other countries on the assessment of safety management in higher education centers; however, unfortunately, there are no comprehensive indexes that have considered aspects of the assessment of these centers in Iran.
Although the framework of safety management varies in studies in the format, they act same to determine the key aspects and indexes for appropriate evaluation of safety management. The history of developing incident risk management plans in the college campus area is very young and it dates back to the late twentieth century. The first crisis management policy and school emergency plan were issued jointly by Minnesota's Ministry of National Security and Ministry of Education in 1999. The emergency methods were revised in 2005. The first comprehensive secure guide of school was published in 2008. The 2011th copy included new guides in the emergency scheduling of disabled students, assessing secure school, and revising the scheduling. In addition, the procedures of comprehensive, secure guidelines of school included general guidelines according to local, state and the best national method. Fernández-Muñiz et al. in their study considered determining the work policies incentives, training, communication, planning (reactive and preventive), control (internal and benchmarking) as dimensions of the SMS. In addition, Vaughen et al. have mentioned the organizational design, organizational changes, monitoring and supporting, training and staff competence, communications, resource and facilities provision, operational procedures, work permits, and resource allocation in emergency condition as components of improving the performance of the safety process. In 2015, Shimada et al. described the definitions safety, employee participation, process safety information, process hazard analysis, operating procedures, training, contractors, prestartup safety review, mechanical integrity, how work permit, management of change, incident investigation, emergency planning and response, compliance audits, trade secrets as essential components of safety management. In addition, Ruzic-Dimitrijevic and Dakic mentioned the essential components of designing the safety management of enterprises as teaching, information system, cooperation, conferences, finances, management, student experience, attractive programs, practice, school reputation, and propaganda.
In the third phase of the study, the average mean of participants' views on the dimensions of the SMS in higher education centers in Iran has been equal to 4.32, with the highest average of 4.59 for the dimension of the facilities and the firefighting department with a mean and the lowest average of 4.1 related to the student dimension. Finally, 82 components were identified as key indexes in the SMS in higher education centers of Iran.
In the field of organizing and productivity of the safety or incident committee, 13 components were identified as key components of this field. One of the best indexes that show establish a safe and good condition in the organization is the existence of a positive attitude toward safety throughout the organization. Management, in collaboration with the Safety and Incident Committee, should develop safety plans to address potential deficiencies, preventing hazards, and appropriate performance when there is a risk in the organization. Yassi et al. necessitated the holding of common health and secure committees for having a secure workplace, which was in line with the results of the current study.
In the area of resource allocation, three components were identified as key components of this field. The disaster and incident management system needs resources and facilities to prevent and manage incidents and disasters and the crises caused by them. To improve the performance of higher education, funding allocation has also been welcomed as an effective and efficient solution. In general, planning, organizing, and directing resources should be done in the event of incidents and disasters.
In the field of continuing education, five indexes were determined as key indexes of this field. People's education and community readiness are very effective in dealing with disasters and incidents. Omidvari and Mansouri in their study have also pointed to the empowerment and reduction of vulnerability of higher education centers through education and the creation of appropriate structures for a higher education center that is consistent with the present study. In addition, Bradley et al. have emphasized in their study that the needs assessment and holding training courses in the field of disasters for managers and personnel play an important role in increasing the level of organization's readiness. In general, the high awareness of the medical staff can be effective in improving the safety of the organization. Educating and increasing the competence of workers, stakeholders, and volunteers in terms of needs assessment as well as holding educational courses for having secure works in this university is necessary.
In the student field, indexes of monitoring the dormitory's safety area; determining the status of health, safety, and security of students; and determining the method and scale assessment of complaint and/or error reporting and potential incidents were identified as the main indexes of this area. Student dormitory for many young people is an inadequate substitute for the family's safe environment. Having support and living with the family is one of the most important psychological and emotional needs of all age groups. Hence, the safety of the dormitory management should be on the agenda.
In the financial field, five components have been identified as key components of this area. Today, countries are trying to recreate their higher education financing system in a way to realize development objectives even better and more. Furthermore, occupational incident insurance is not just a source of compensation for financial losses from incidents, but it can also be used with the proper policy of insurance to prevent abnormal incidents. This requires changing the look of insurance and if necessary preparing and developing new rules and regulations.
In the field of information technology, eight indexes were identified as key indexes of this field. Communicating and informing among organs and people are the first step in disaster planning and management. Therefore, the use of an effective system of preventing incidents requires a conscious exposure to the environment and accurate, getting correct, accurate, and up-to-date information. In addition, studies have been conducted on the confidentiality and security of data and information related to patients in the hospital information system; among them, the study by Fernando and Dawson can be mentioned.
Five indexes were identified as key indexes of health and safety field.
The health of human resource and friendly environment has an effect on the continuous development, effectiveness, and profitability of organizations. Therefore, any status that can lead to the preservation and protection of these causes actually increases productivity in the organization. To improve Health and Safety Executive
(HSE) status, it is important to pay attention to some of the features, such as competence history, education, competitive spirit, and environmental knowledge. Aksorn and Hadikusumo also explain that factors such as management support, effective program planning, program evaluation, proper monitoring, control system, and safety precautions and teamwork are effective in implementing safety plans.
In the field of building, four components were identified as key components of this field. Modern construction laws do not provide sufficient safety for patients in hospitals in different circumstances. Therefore, user identification and building regulations provide the minimum requirements for building design and construction and provides balance between the best in safety and economic facilities.
In the field of assessing indoor area of building, 13 indexes were identified as key indexes of this field. The safety of the building's indoor area is to provide a series of facilities (in compliance with legal criteria) in the building. Indoor area of building helps to secure, improve health conditions and increase the staffs desire. Also, indoor area of building includes the safety of ladders, stairs, floors, ceilings, elevators, and so on.
Four indexes were identified as key indexes of the external environment. Nowadays, the complications and injuries to life and property caused by natural disasters and the external environment have a tremendous impact on the lives of humans, to the extent that destructive effects disturb the ability of a society to meet basic needs. Therefore, the US government describes the establishment of a plan for health care centers as a starting point for the safety of academic environments against disasters. In addition to emphasizing the need for the formation of planning groups and crisis advisory committees at universities and flexibility in the programs, the program emphasizes the need for regular review and monitoring.
In the area of installations and firefighters, 13 indexes were identified as key indexes of this field. According to the results of Beranek, all fire damage occurs while using safety principles, and 75% of the fires are before prediction and prevention. Zamanian et al., in their study, offered solutions such as the fitting of fire hydrants with suitable water pressure, firefighting boxes, existence of firefighting capsules that are controlled and charged periodically and embedded in alarm system, and fire extinguishing and emergency aid boxes to reduce the risks of fire.
Finally, six indicators were identified as key indicators of the laboratory area. Each laboratory has risks that may pose a threat to employees, students, and personnel. Occurrence of safety incidents in laboratories may result in secondary outcomes such as loss of reputation and lowering of clients and consequently in incomes, negative impact on employee retention, and rising costs for legal and insurance issues. The World Health Organization declared in 2008 that 92 countries lack a comprehensive safety program for clinical laboratories.
One of the limitations of the research was the limitations of articles in the field of safety management in the phase of study search. Therefore, researchers tried to increase the thematic scope of the research and used the keywords of risk management and safety management in the study phase to increase the articles and subsequently to increase the search precision. Overall, in the monitoring process and evaluating the quality of articles, only those papers entered the findings that had complete harmony with the scientific definition of safety management.
Furthermore, in this study, the design of SMS in higher education centers has been extracted through a review of the studies, some of the components and dimensions of safety management in higher education centers have not been studied in Iran and in the world, and this has been led to lake of identification of these components in the final pattern.
Thus, it is suggested that key themes of safety management are extracted first through a more comprehensive analysis. Then, the effective components on each key theme are recognized by using the combination of qualitative method such as text survey and interview so that a comprehensive and complete pattern is designed for the safety management at the higher education institutes.
Finally, the findings in the present study can suggest a valid key index for the safety management at the higher education institutes by translating and combining the findings related to the safety management in the world and Iran and to the field of decision-making and action. Generally, widespread studies have been conducted in other countries on the evaluation of safety management at the higher education institutes, but insufficient programming and organization in Iran led to the sporadic studies and no comprehensive model has been suggested for the safety management at the higher education institutes. By implementing the proposed safety management indexes, it is possible to control the accidents beforehand for the higher education institutes and avoid the probable economic, social, and human damages in the time of occurring accidents.
| Conclusion|| |
The SMS is an official framework for safety in performing daily activities that includes safety policy, safety and executive goals, risk assessment, responsibilities and authorities, regulations and procedures, and monitoring and assessment processes. The SMS in various studies is apparently different; however, in fact, they all seek to determine key aspects and indexes for an appropriate assessment of safety management. Therefore, it is imperative that university administrators should set up the system in their higher education centers with command lines and delegated authorities and organizational and legal tools while aware of the dimensions and components of safety management. A safety policy in each organization should be verified and supported by high-level management and the safety goals of the institute should be clear.
Finally, it can be said that safety is not isolated from other matters and is mixed with all human and machine activities, but it is effective and realistic when to be associated with detailed inspection plans and the existence of safety plans, training, exercises, and exercise to incidents and disasters. Therefore, it is suggested that the indexes of safety management are delivered to the beneficiaries, providers, and users of health services at the higher education institutes through a complete reportage. It is also suggested that the list of recognized indexes be updated based on future research and need for higher education institutes.
This article is registered with the code R17101395 in the research board of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. We want to express a special recognition to the specialists who have participated in the study, without whom the study could not be possible.
Financial support and sponsorship
This study was financially supported by Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Kageyama A. The implementation process of enterprise risk management in higher education institutions. Int Rev Bus 2014;14:61-80.
IFC. Disaster and Emergency Preparedness: Guidance for Schools. USA: World Bank Group; 2010. p. 1-72.
Frankenberg E, Sikoki B, Sumantri C, Suriastini W, Thomas D. Education, vulnerability, and resilience after a natural disaster. Ecol Soc 2013;18:16.
Aiello M. Risk in Canada's Higher Education Landscape a Survey of Canadian Universities and College. Marsh Risk Consulting; 2012.
University of London Guide to Risk Management. University of London; 2009.
Grote G. Safety management in different high-risk domains–all the same? Saf Sci 2012;50:1983-92.
Taghdisi MH. Health, safety and environment management; a creative approach to sustainable development. Iran Occup Health 2006;3(2):1-5.
Yorio PL, Willmer DR, Moore SM. Health and safety management systems through a multilevel and strategic management perspective: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Saf Sci 2015;72:221-8.
WHS Risk Management Guidelines. Australia: University of Wollongong; 2016. p. 1-18.
Jablochnikov S. Aspects of Safety of the education Systems. IDIMT-2012 ICT Support for Complex Systems-20th
Interdisciplinary Information Management Talks. Linz: Trauner Verlag; 2012. p. 359-62.
Huber M. Risk Identification at Higher Education Institutions in England. London School of Economics and Political Science; 2011.
Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar AR, et al.
Design and implementation content validity study: Development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. J Caring Sci 2015;4:165-78.
Higher Education Funding Council for England. Risk Management in Higher Education A Guide to Good Practice, Prepared for HEFCE by Pricewaterhouse Coopers. England; 2005. p. 1-41.
Omidvari M, Mansouri N. Fire and spillage risk assessment pattern in scientific laboratories. Int J Occup Hyg 2015;6:68-74.
Lapus JA, Bacani RC, Mateo JL, Hernandez OR. Deped Educational Facilities Manual (Revised Edition of the 2007 Handbook on Educational Facilities – Integrating Disaster Risk Reduction in School Construction). Pasig City: DEPED; 2010.
Safety DoEH. California State University, Fresno Risk Management/Environmental Health and Safety Policy. California: Environmental Health and Safety; 2010. p. 1-2.
Colleges (AGB) AoGBoUa. The State of Enterprise Risk Management at Colleges and Universities Today. Washington: United Educators; 2009. p. 1-32.
Administration MOWLSS. Wilfrid Laurier University Enterprise Risk Management Draft Final Report. Australia: Deloitte and Touche LLP and Affiliated Entities; 2011.
Savage A. Applying Risk Management in a University Environment to Manage the Risk of Fraud and Corruption. Australian: Australian Public Sector Anti-Corruption Conference; 2007. p. 1-12.
Olvera C. Risk Management for Student Organization Advisors. Wisconsin: National Center for Student Leadership; 2010.
The Department for Education Welsh Assembly Government and Scottish Government. Health and Safety Checklist for Classrooms. UK: Health and Safety Executive; 2008. p. 1-3.
Ruzic-Dimitrijevic L, Dakic J. The risk management in higher education institutions. Online J Appl Knowl Manage 2014;2:137-52.
Sutela M, Aartsen PJ. Financing Instruments for Higher Education and Research Institutions: Financial KPIs Risk Management Commercialisation. European Seminar. Berlin: The European Academy for Taxes, Economics and Law Reserves; 4-5 December, 2014. p. 1-11.
Member Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Respiratory Protection Program: University of Notre Dame. Indiana: University of Notre Dame, 2006.
Disaster and Emergency Preparedness: Guidance for Schools. International Finance Corporation; 2010.
Coetzee C, Van Niekerk D. Tracking the evolution of the disaster management cycle: A general system theory approach. Jàmbá J Disaster Risk Stud 2012;4:1-9.
Management HSaE. Comprehensive School Safety Guide. School Safety Planning and Response. USA: Safe and Drug Free Schools and Community State; 2014. p. 1-135.
Fernández-Muñiz B, Montes-Peon JM, Vazquez-Ordas CJ. Safety management system: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2007;20:52-68.
Vaughen BK, Downes A, Fox J, Belonger D. Guidelines for integrating management systems and metrics to improve process safety performance. Process Saf Prog 2015;34:259-66.
Shimada Y, Kitajima T, Fuchino T, Takeda K. Process safety management based on the business process model of engineering activities. J Chem Eng Japan 2015;48:609-18.
Patankar M & Sabin EJ. The safety culture perspective. Human Factors in Aviation. National Center for Aviation Safety Research Saint Louis University; Louis, Missouri, 2010. p. 95-122.
Abdi Z, Maleki M, Khosravi A. Staff perceptions of patient safety culture in selected hospitals of Tehran medical sciences university. Payesh J 2009;10:411-20.
Yassi A, Lockhart K, Sykes M, Buck B, Stime B, Spiegel JM, et al.
Effectiveness of joint health and safety committees: A realist review. Am J Ind Med 2013;56:424-38.
Djalali A, Castren M, Khankeh H, Gryth D, Radestad M, Ohlen G, et al.
Hospital disaster preparedness as measured by functional capacity: A comparison between Iran and Sweden. Prehosp Disaster Med 2013;28:454-61.
Manouchehr O. Investigation of the Crisis Management System and Method of Risk Assessment for Educational Center (Case Study: Science and Research Branch, IAU). Tehran: Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch; 2010-2011.
Bradley E, Hynam B, Nolan P. Nurse prescribing: Reflections on safety in practice. Soc Sci Med 2007;65:599-609.
Zanko M, Dawson P. Occupational health and safety management in organizations: A review. Int J Manage Rev 2012;14:328-44.
Gonnason T. Risk Management Report. Canada: University of New Brunswick; 2017.
Johnstone DB, Marcucci P. Financing Higher Education in International Perspective: Who Pays? Who Should Pay. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2010.
Bochmann F, Arning M, Sun Y, Nold A. Reduction of Occupational Accidents: Evidence based Prevention and the Prevention Index (PI TOP). Int J Epidemiol 2015;44 Suppl 1:i171-2.
Gonzalez JJ, Turoff M, Dugdale J. Introduction to the Communication and Information Systems Technology for Crisis and Disaster Management; 2015.
Fernando JI, Dawson LL. The health information system security threat lifecycle: An informatics theory. Int J Med Inform 2009;78:815-26.
Binagwaho A, Kyamanywa P, Farmer PE, Nuthulaganti T, Umubyeyi B, Nyemazi JP, et al
. The human resources for health program in Rwanda – A new partnership. N Engl J Med 2013;369:2054-9.
Hou X, Zhang Q, Qu X, Ma Z, editors. The effective contractor management in international oil cooperation. Asia Pacific Health, Safety, Security and Environment Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers; 2009.
Aksorn T, Hadikusumo B. Critical success factors influencing safety program performance in Thai construction projects. Saf Sci 2008;46:709-27.
Nivolianitou Z, Synodinou B. Towards emergency management of natural disasters and critical accidents: The Greek experience. J Environ Manage 2011;92:2657-65.
Kapucu N, Khosa S. Disaster resiliency and culture of preparedness for university and college campuses. Adm Soc 2013;45:3-37.
Beranek J. Hot new options for hospital fire safety. Occup Health Saf 2005;74:32, 34-6.
Zamanian Z, Evazian M, Hazeghi I, Daneshmandi H. Fire safety status in the hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Int J Occup Hyg 2015;5:96-100.
World Health Organization. Laboratory Quality Management System Training Toolkit. World Health Organization; 2012.
World Health Organization. Joint WHO – CDC Conference on Health Laboratory Quality Systems. France: World Health Organization; 2008. p. 21.
[Table 1], [Table 2]